There was someone in an earlier post that mention perhaps the PC release was just to test things. So ZOE could have a great release on the Console and therefore be the FIRST to launch a console MMO. With all the accolades about how polished and refined the console release was to be the first of it kind.
If that were true Just WOW what a slap in the face to everyone that bought any edition for the PC.
and sometimes that thought does look like it makes sense.
@Fleymark
You'd implied in one of your (and some other entities) earlier postings that only someone who has reached a certain level (that should be shown in the post according to your post) are able to evaluate the game as a whole, not only a specific game area.
So I'd contradicted your PoV and claimed the view as posted by me. As usual, some guys came by and missunderstood the whole intention of my posting, cause of my lack in english language skills or their lack to read accordingly... who can say?
If you are judging a specific game area as the VR content and specify this in your posting, as you did in your last one, then for me, this is perfectly fine.
There was someone in an earlier post that mention perhaps the PC release was just to test things. So ZOE could have a great release on the Console and therefore be the FIRST to launch a console MMO. With all the accolades about how polished and refined the console release was to be the first of it kind.
If that were true Just WOW what a slap in the face to everyone that bought any edition for the PC.
and sometimes that thought does look like it makes sense.
Lets look at this for a moment. It's a pretty risky idea, I mean gamers are a pretty fickle bunch. The fact is, if this is true, Zeni are risking their console version dying even before launch. As it stands now, if I was a console player waiting for this game to be released I would not be making a purchase of it after visiting these boards. Had it released weeks ago when it was due for release, then I would have because everything seemed ok then.
It's a pretty silly business idea to me. Release something below par that will annoy a large portion of your customer base. Then expect to sell the same product a few months later to a new customer base and hope they haven't seen or read of your previous failings.
Personally I think Zeni dropped the bomb with the BOT invasion and now their precious time is being wasted on this rather than fully focusing on developing the game.
BrassRazoo wrote: »Because people want things for free.
Millionaires wrote: »Every MMORPG has bots, find me one that doesn't.
.
There was someone in an earlier post that mention perhaps the PC release was just to test things. So ZOE could have a great release on the Console and therefore be the FIRST to launch a console MMO. With all the accolades about how polished and refined the console release was to be the first of it kind.
If that were true Just WOW what a slap in the face to everyone that bought any edition for the PC.
and sometimes that thought does look like it makes sense.
Lets look at this for a moment. It's a pretty risky idea, I mean gamers are a pretty fickle bunch. The fact is, if this is true, Zeni are risking their console version dying even before launch. As it stands now, if I was a console player waiting for this game to be released I would not be making a purchase of it after visiting these boards. Had it released weeks ago when it was due for release, then I would have because everything seemed ok then.
It's a pretty silly business idea to me. Release something below par that will annoy a large portion of your customer base. Then expect to sell the same product a few months later to a new customer base and hope they haven't seen or read of your previous failings.
Personally I think Zeni dropped the bomb with the BOT invasion and now their precious time is being wasted on this rather than fully focusing on developing the game.
Warhammer was one. Couldn't get bugs and class balance under control in timely fashion after release in a PvP centric game. The devs frittered around with fixes seemingly forever. The fanbois all said the same things they always do. "MMOs always release with bugs," "give them a chance," "good riddance to the complainers that leave," etc. Had fantastic graphics and was a lot of fun. The servers shut down within a couple years.
Millionaires wrote: »flguy147ub17_ESO wrote: »
Every MMORPG has bots, find me one that doesn't.
I have NEVER seen other MMORPGs (since Ultima Online, Eve Online, WoW, LOTRO, etc.,) have the BOTS that manipulate their game code to the degree that they have on ESO, thus far!
Voicing concerns over legitimate issues != hate
Yes I can. Because in the meantime - while I wait for Zenimax to bring the game into working order. I can use the money that I am saving and spend it on games that actually WORK RIGHT NOW and are fun RIGHT NOW.Millionaires wrote: »
Anyone who is currently dropping subscriptions because the game isn't perfect.. I have no words for. Because that's the attitude that's killing games, you cannot call yourself a gamer, if you do that.
I personally will keep renewing whenever I can, just so I can sit back and watch Zenimax transform this game, into a new-age MMORPG.
Millionaires wrote: »Anyone who is currently dropping subscriptions because the game isn't perfect.. I have no words for. Because that's the attitude that's killing games, you cannot call yourself a gamer, if you do that.
thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Most people are complaining because:
- 50% of the base classes are not wanted for high end content (because they are subpar)
- stamina based builds are a joke compared to magicka based builds (that adds another decent % to the unwanted)
- tanks do better in light armor than they do in heavy
- bots everywhere
- bugs everywhere
- no trade chat
- horrible guild store interface(or no AH, take your pick)
- forced to grind quests at vet levels
And the list goes on, there is plenty to complain about. That's not saying that there aren't good things as well, but you can only polish a turd for so long, and all that.