Rate this game on a 1-10 scale.

Zeeed · May 2014

8

After patch i could say 8.

Game runs gr8 on my pc. Maybe had 1 crash

BrassRazoo · May 2014

10

I like the guns.

david271749 · May 2014

6

And the average is.......

Blackwidow · May 2014

3

Drazticulous wrote: »

My drug is playing the game for as long as I want.... right now I'm out of said drug cause I can't log in.... but I give it a 9 because I look passed the faults of a brand new game that stuff was bound to be broke in..... can't have a PERFECT beginning you need errors to make it better and so people appreciate it more when it's finally working as intended.

When you look past all the faults of something it can look nice.

Try taking the blinders off and look again.

sgreco1970_ESO · May 2014

9

I happily give this game a 9. Thing is, its a 9 for me because it is such a story-heavy ES game. That's what I came here for.

If the game becomes World of Elderscrollscraft, though, I will quit.

We have craglorn now. Now there's enough pvp and raiding junk. I hope the next patch is for ES fans and questors.

Eris · May 2014

8

I like the game and enjoy playing it. I would rate it higher if I could use the mouse to click attacks and the keyboard to target. Otherwise I'm good.

Still_Mind · May 2014

8

Between 7 and 8. Needs faster hotfixing, faster, more dedicated balancing, and faster, harsher action against bots and hackers (and hacking bots - Bleakrock island, for example, is populated with noclip bots that run at lightning speed).

zgrssd · May 2014

9

Considering it is a MMO that launched not even 2 Months ago, it is suprisingly well developed and engaging.
It has positively surprised me in every area.

Falmer · May 2014

9

Well for me its a 9 pretty easily. However, I am probably not your typical MMO player either.

I play the game 99% solo and I enjoy it that way. I have no desire for Vet content since I would prefer to experience other alliances with different characters and classes.

As a single player game, with built in friend chat, its a pretty good game.

There are some annoying issues that come from having multiple people, but I can ignore a great many of those. I think the biggest problem the game has is going to be its longevity per player. I might run through each alliance once or even twice, but after I consumed all that content to my satisfaction, then what's left? Any new expansions will likely be Vet++ levels, and that sort of leaves me and others like me out.

Turelus · May 2014

7

I went with seven although I really don't like rating systems for MMOs because they're something which develops over time and improve with age in most cases.

Maybe a rating for the game in its current state but even then 1.1.3 is going to appease a large number of players with fixes any way, one player that' super angry about issue x and rates the game a 5 today might be happy when it's fixed and rate the game an 8.

Jeremy · May 2014

david271749 wrote: »

Describe the reason for your rating below.

Over-all I'd give the game a 7. But I agree with those offering a pre/post-patch analysis and would currently give this game a 4 due to recent and serious combat bugs that are making this game difficult for me to enjoy.

Graphics/Sound: 9 (Environments are beautiful and expansive with immersive ambience and weather effects)

Gameplay: 9 (Cleverly designed, challenging, and rewarding)

Negatives: the player-driven economy is horrid. Loses 2 points for this.

So that's why I give the game a 7 pre-patch.

Fuzzylumpkins · May 2014

4

Beta was 6. I could forgive the bugs it was beta.

Post beta, well I do not believe the game is even close to being out of beta, but post patches 4.

david271749 · July 2015

6

I would probably give it less now.

lathbury · July 2015

9

I had a great night last night finally got hard mode AA and sanctum done with my guild. a few of us had done them elsewhere as pugs but tonight was our first guild clear of them. tomorrow hard mode hel ra

. we also managed to find time to help some guild members get VDSA done.

FilthyMudcrabs · July 2015

8

Dear people who voted 1 - Why are you still here? If you hate the game, go play another one.

Kaitona · July 2015

9

It gets a 9/10 from me, losing a point simply because it relies on account names instead of character names in the game. Otherwise I'd give it a 10.

The_Sadist · July 2015

6

I gave it a 6, really enjoyed my first playthrough despite the bugs and flaws. The lack of content and broken promises and left me somewhat jaded, let's hope they can fix their game.

Anlaemar · July 2015

10

Kaitona wrote: »

It gets a 9/10 from me, losing a point simply because it relies on account names instead of character names in the game. Otherwise I'd give it a 10.

Did you look at the date of the thread? Someone sure did necro'd.

Azurulia · July 2015

8

Blackwidow wrote: »

Drazticulous wrote: »

My drug is playing the game for as long as I want.... right now I'm out of said drug cause I can't log in.... but I give it a 9 because I look passed the faults of a brand new game that stuff was bound to be broke in..... can't have a PERFECT beginning you need errors to make it better and so people appreciate it more when it's finally working as intended.

When you look past all the faults of something it can look nice.

Try taking the blinders off and look again.

Try opening your eyes a little more and look again.

If you ask me, those who rated 3 and below probably have no business rating anything because they simply don't know how, have not experienced enough games to know how to truly compare them, or are angry about soemthing and want to show their anger with an absurdly low number.

if this game was really a 3 or less, we would have blocky polygon models and the game would look and feel like something I played in the early dames of the Nintendo 64. Which might be a bit too early for some of the people here.

Now for 8 and above, people may be a bit too optimistic or blind to the games issues, that or choose not to look at them.

Why did I rate 8? Because compared to what I have seen lately, this "Turd" of a game looks like a solid gold bar next to some of the other stuff out there currently. Do I think it's perfect? Hell no, this game has a ton of flaws. now are all of those flaws really bad? No, not all of them. Not all that different to almost every other triple A title atm. (Except maybe the cashes if I really had to nitpick)

The reason why I am here still and haven't left after the first week is becaouse I know what else is out there, and I find this game to actually be "fun" which is something I've been lacking lately.

With that said, 8/10.

BigM · July 2015

6

I give it a so so!

tplink3r1 · July 2015

8

Too much LAG.

jamesharv2005ub17_ESO · July 2015

2

I gave it a generous 2. So much potential wasted. They refused from the very start to listen to their players and they continue to ignore the players to this day. Almost 10 months of stagnation with all the fixes people told them about before the game even launched.

Like with IC they still insist they know better than their customers do what makes a good game. Unfortunately with egos like that the game is going to continue to go downhill until there is a shake up over at ZOS. This game should be rivaling WoW instead it cannot even compete with games like lord of the rings online or eve which have been out for years and years.

Utterly disappointed and disgusted with it. I had planned to spend a lot of time in Tamriel. As of now I cannot even stand to login the game anymore. Im praying that with orsinium they get back to what the elder scrolls is all about and stop trying to make it some generic MMO.

I gave it a two because at least I havent had to pay them since March.

Psychobunni · July 2015

6

Dead Body Disposal by...NECRO ftw!

Mighty_oakk · July 2015

5

5 - with text chat and or a lfg tool that only took a few min would be 7 or 8

AngryNord · July 2015

8

7.5 - 8

dsalter · July 2015

5

i'd rate it more but balance, exploits and lack of communication on the skills, crafting and PvP boards makes me feel like the devs dont care for combat other thank the new DLC or crown store.
patch progress that fixes imbalance or even needed hotfixes dont happen for months.

Bromburak · July 2015

8

Personally I cannot give a 10 for following reasons.

1. The lags were always an issue in Cyrodiil.
2. PvP objectives need improvement and players more commitment to their faction. ( IC is a start but we not there yet.)
3. Classes need more diversity , this requires new ideas for skill lines and a proper deployment cycle to keep it attractive to players.

Farorin · July 2015

9

Before patch, 7, after patch 9.

Lava_Croft · July 2015

5

It could have been a clear 9, but thanks to the imcompetence of ZOS it gets a 5 because I'm a fanboy.

AH93 · July 2015

5

5
It's an average game at best, with so much potential that has never been taken advantage of.