awww i think its adorable when free rp zergers tell themselves that their zerg could win
bring more than 24, you will need more bro, no offense.
fyi, you missed the point of the thread lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXgVezeb8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIyCpcHsGo4"my 24 man would rip ur 6man" that statement alone, let it sink abit. bwahahahaha
Not what I said.
You made the assertion that any 24 man is automatically a zerg. And then made the (even more idiotic - impressively enough) statement that such "zerg" groups are "free rps to me".
Sorry if I pointed out that your claim is b.s.
dbetterton_ESO wrote: »dbetterton_ESO wrote: »Lol at group of 24 = zerg.
24 is a zerg u muppet. even 15 is.
You hurt my feelings. :'(
So if 15 is a "zerg" what do you call 50 or a 100 DC rolling over the hill?
This isn't 8 man arena PvP. 20-30 man groups are the perfect size for keep taking (and other organized offensive action) on an active, populated server.
As much as I enjoy small team action, that doesn't negate the usefulness (and propriety) of raid groups. And unless you are playing on a deserted campaign, such groups are hardly "zergy".
dbetterton_ESO wrote: »I think I'll adopt the new (meaningless) definition of zerg...
Here's me, my wife and a guildy wiping an AD ZERG™https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXgVezeb8
Maybe I should start a thread about 3-manning the zerg.
As for a glimpse - near the end before I die- of what an actual zerg looks like...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIyCpcHsGo4
dbetterton_ESO wrote: »
You made the assertion that any 24 man is automatically a zerg. And then made the (even more idiotic - impressively enough) statement that such "zerg" groups are "free rps to me".
Sorry if I pointed out that your claim is b.s.
xsorusb14_ESO wrote: »dbetterton_ESO wrote: »I think I'll adopt the new (meaningless) definition of zerg...
Here's me, my wife and a guildy wiping an AD ZERG™https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXgVezeb8
Maybe I should start a thread about 3-manning the zerg.
As for a glimpse - near the end before I die- of what an actual zerg looks like...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIyCpcHsGo4
Not to take anything away from you
In the first video you're fighting next to a keep with enemies getting sieged while trying to kill you.
In the second video, You're sitting inside a farm house with a bunch of other people from your side dumping oil on those that come in.
dbetterton_ESO wrote: »xsorusb14_ESO wrote: »dbetterton_ESO wrote: »I think I'll adopt the new (meaningless) definition of zerg...
Here's me, my wife and a guildy wiping an AD ZERG™https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXgVezeb8
Maybe I should start a thread about 3-manning the zerg.
As for a glimpse - near the end before I die- of what an actual zerg looks like...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIyCpcHsGo4
Not to take anything away from you
In the first video you're fighting next to a keep with enemies getting sieged while trying to kill you.
In the second video, You're sitting inside a farm house with a bunch of other people from your side dumping oil on those that come in.
Actually in the first, there was no siege defense. We did have the gate NPCs, but other than that we were alone at the keep. But, there was nothing amazing about our play. The 15+ AD just were unable/unwilling to attack in any coordinated way. So, by the definition asserted by the OP, the three of us wiped a zerg.
In the second, I didn't mean to claim I had personally defeated a zerg. On the contrary - I was in an organized guild group - or "zerg" as some would call it.I was just trying to illustrate the difference between an actual zerg (large numbers milling about outside and coming inside piecemeal to get killed) and an organized raid group (talking, coordinating, using synergies).
A. the 6man never claimed superiority, you implied it tho.
B. Zerging is generally considered running with more than 10-15, as group sizes are determined by the game.
C. Only an idiot would claim to have been zerged as a solo who died to a group.
D. We have been known to let solos go, and even smallmans.
E. Its obvious that you are a zerger by how defensive you are on this topic. no offense.
nobody here has told you what # to run. i think you need to reread the OP lol
this is about making you a better player, so that we have gvg competition later, and the start to making you a better player, is teaching you the difference between zergs and groups.
for me, i wouldnt run with more than 8, ever. its easy to wipe your zerg with 6, so why would we want to split the points with more people?
nobody here has told you what # to run. i think you need to reread the OP lol
this is about making you a better player, so that we have gvg competition later, and the start to making you a better player, is teaching you the difference between zergs and groups.
for me, i wouldnt run with more than 8, ever. its easy to wipe your zerg with 6, so why would we want to split the points with more people?
Why do you run more than a group? Just curious. Someone could easily make the exact argument you make by saying they only run with a group (4) and therefore you are bad.
you can call it whatever you like, raid. zerg. etc. its all just free rps to me, as no good players would be caught dead in a zerg.
A. the 6man never claimed superiority, you implied it tho.
B. Zerging is generally considered running with more than 10-15, as group sizes are determined by the game.
C. Only an idiot would claim to have been zerged as a solo who died to a group.
D. We have been known to let solos go, and even smallmans.
E. Its obvious that you are a zerger by how defensive you are on this topic. no offense.
If you are referring to me... I solo, group with guild, and also sometimes run with zerg taking keeps. I don't take things as serious as I did when I played daoc.
Thinking you're better than everyone who runs with "zerg" is pretty ignorant.
I'm not being defense, I made 1 post that the argument is all in the eyes of the beholder. There isn't some magic number that makes it a "zerg".
You come across as an arrogant adolescent fyi.
you can call it whatever you like, raid. zerg. etc. its all just free rps to me, as no good players would be caught dead in a zerg.
That's a bit more than me "implying". And by your other posts it's pretty clear you think you are ATLEAST good.
I could really care less, because this game is just turning into a raid ball ae spam contest. Eso is not a game to show off your superior competitive PvP. It is very limited in tactics/strategy.
you can call it whatever you like, raid. zerg. etc. its all just free rps to me, as no good players would be caught dead in a zerg.
That's a bit more than me "implying". And by your other posts it's pretty clear you think you are ATLEAST good.
I could really care less, because this game is just turning into a raid ball ae spam contest. Eso is not a game to show off your superior competitive PvP. It is very limited in tactics/strategy.
wait... so i made a post about how zergers should get better and make smallmans to make competition, and you are now saying that its a zerg only game, despite us clearly showing that zergs get farmed by good groups.
lol we clearly proved that this isnt a zerg ball game, so either get better or get use to being farmed as free rps.