Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6

6man Zerg Farming

  • lao
    lao
    ✭✭✭✭
    Lowbei wrote: »
    awww i think its adorable when free rp zergers tell themselves that their zerg could win :)

    bring more than 24, you will need more bro, no offense.

    fyi, you missed the point of the thread lol

    well u cant rly blame him for beeing delusional. blame the companys that make mmos these days instead. back in the days guys like him would have been cleaned up by the noob filter aka skill ceiling. since these modern mmos dont even have a skill ceiling anymore and can be more or less successfully played by mentally disabled apes zerglings like him are running wild everywhere thinking they are worth something.

    "my 24 man would rip ur 6man" that statement alone, let it sink abit. bwahahahaha

    PS: edited for politeness in order to not get the thread closed. sry mods i tried but this is literally the best i can do :P
    Edited by lao on May 16, 2014 7:28PM
  • Thechemicals
    Thechemicals
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    What do you guys think about my pvp skills?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MObwNi4Lo98
    Vr14 Templar since release- dual resto
    Vr14 Dk bow/2h

    Brayan Blackthunder
    Goddick
    Daggerfall Covenant

  • lao
    lao
    ✭✭✭✭
    What do you guys think about my pvp skills?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MObwNi4Lo98

    honestly, skip the gaming and stick to guitar. u might have a future in that
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    yeeeeah from your video, it seems you are awful at pvp, no offense.

    stick to guitar
  • Talcyndl
    Talcyndl
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think I'll adopt the new (meaningless) definition of zerg...

    Here's me, my wife and a guildy wiping an AD ZERG™

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXgVezeb8

    Maybe I should start a thread about 3-manning the zerg. ;)

    As for a glimpse - near the end before I die :) - of what an actual zerg looks like...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIyCpcHsGo4
    Tal'gro Bol
    PvP Vice Officer [Retired] and Huscarl of Vokundein
    http://www.legend-gaming.net/vokundein/
  • Talcyndl
    Talcyndl
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    lao wrote: »
    Lowbei wrote: »
    "my 24 man would rip ur 6man" that statement alone, let it sink abit. bwahahahaha

    Not what I said.

    You made the assertion that any 24 man is automatically a zerg. And then made the (even more idiotic - impressively enough) statement that such "zerg" groups are "free rps to me".

    Sorry if I pointed out that your claim is b.s.
    Tal'gro Bol
    PvP Vice Officer [Retired] and Huscarl of Vokundein
    http://www.legend-gaming.net/vokundein/
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    its ok if you are upset about 24 being a zerg, and its ok if you are upset about being free rps.

    a lion never worries over the opinions of sheep :smile:

    thanks for the rps lol
  • Talcyndl
    Talcyndl
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    You home on AB or Wabba Lowbei?
    Tal'gro Bol
    PvP Vice Officer [Retired] and Huscarl of Vokundein
    http://www.legend-gaming.net/vokundein/
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    mines AB but most of us have switched to wabba so i may switch tonight
    i really dont care where we play tho.
  • Xsorus
    Xsorus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    lao wrote: »
    Lol at group of 24 = zerg.

    24 is a zerg u muppet. even 15 is.

    You hurt my feelings. :'( :trollface:

    So if 15 is a "zerg" what do you call 50 or a 100 DC rolling over the hill?

    This isn't 8 man arena PvP. 20-30 man groups are the perfect size for keep taking (and other organized offensive action) on an active, populated server.

    As much as I enjoy small team action, that doesn't negate the usefulness (and propriety) of raid groups. And unless you are playing on a deserted campaign, such groups are hardly "zergy".

    Oooh..I know the answer

    a Zerg...


  • Xsorus
    Xsorus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think I'll adopt the new (meaningless) definition of zerg...

    Here's me, my wife and a guildy wiping an AD ZERG™

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXgVezeb8

    Maybe I should start a thread about 3-manning the zerg. ;)

    As for a glimpse - near the end before I die :) - of what an actual zerg looks like...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIyCpcHsGo4

    Not to take anything away from you

    In the first video you're fighting next to a keep with enemies getting sieged while trying to kill you.

    In the second video, You're sitting inside a farm house with a bunch of other people from your side dumping oil on those that come in.

  • lao
    lao
    ✭✭✭✭

    You made the assertion that any 24 man is automatically a zerg. And then made the (even more idiotic - impressively enough) statement that such "zerg" groups are "free rps to me".

    Sorry if I pointed out that your claim is b.s.

    yes every 24 man is automatically a zerg. sry that i pointed out that u are bad.
    Edited by lao on May 16, 2014 8:23PM
  • Gloran
    Gloran
    ✭✭
    My favourite part of the first video is, when it takes them 15 seconds to kill that VR1 2k HP DK all by himself, much quality players, very inspiring, such competitive.
    Officer of Alacrity
    Niwilav - AD Sorc VR12
    Nivilaw - AD Nightblade VR12
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    lol

    "i solo'd the zerg! nevermind all these friendlies, it was all me!"
  • Nooblet
    Nooblet
    ✭✭✭✭
    This is silly. A Zerg is defined by the group you run with. "Zerging" can be 3 players killing a solo. 20 v 5 or 100 v 50. It's all depending on situation.

    I don't see how ppl get mad about it though. And I'm sure that group of 6 doesn't let solos run by..so probably shouldn't talk like they are superior.
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    A. the 6man never claimed superiority, you implied it tho.

    B. Zerging is generally considered running with more than 10-15, as group sizes are determined by the game.

    C. Only an idiot would claim to have been zerged as a solo who died to a group.

    D. We have been known to let solos go, and even smallmans.

    E. Its obvious that you are a zerger by how defensive you are on this topic. no offense.
    Edited by Lowbei on May 16, 2014 8:35PM
  • Talcyndl
    Talcyndl
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think I'll adopt the new (meaningless) definition of zerg...

    Here's me, my wife and a guildy wiping an AD ZERG™

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXgVezeb8

    Maybe I should start a thread about 3-manning the zerg. ;)

    As for a glimpse - near the end before I die :) - of what an actual zerg looks like...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIyCpcHsGo4

    Not to take anything away from you

    In the first video you're fighting next to a keep with enemies getting sieged while trying to kill you.

    In the second video, You're sitting inside a farm house with a bunch of other people from your side dumping oil on those that come in.

    Actually in the first, there was no siege defense. We did have the gate NPCs, but other than that we were alone at the keep. But, there was nothing amazing about our play. The 15+ AD just were unable/unwilling to attack in any coordinated way. So, by the definition asserted by the OP, the three of us wiped a zerg. :)

    In the second, I didn't mean to claim I had personally defeated a zerg. On the contrary - I was in an organized guild group - or "zerg" as some would call it. ;) I was just trying to illustrate the difference between an actual zerg (large numbers milling about outside and coming inside piecemeal to get killed) and an organized raid group (talking, coordinating, using synergies).
    Tal'gro Bol
    PvP Vice Officer [Retired] and Huscarl of Vokundein
    http://www.legend-gaming.net/vokundein/
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    you can call it whatever you like, raid. zerg. etc. its all just free rps to me, as no good players would be caught dead in a zerg.
  • Talcyndl
    Talcyndl
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No good player would ever join a group of more than __?

    What number is allowed in your view of "good" PvP?

    We may need to disband our guild based on your insights. ;)
    Tal'gro Bol
    PvP Vice Officer [Retired] and Huscarl of Vokundein
    http://www.legend-gaming.net/vokundein/
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    nobody here has told you what # to run. i think you need to reread the OP lol

    this is about making you a better player, so that we have gvg competition later, and the start to making you a better player, is teaching you the difference between zergs and groups.

    for me, i wouldnt run with more than 8, ever. its easy to wipe your zerg with 6, so why would we want to split the points with more people?
    Edited by Lowbei on May 16, 2014 8:48PM
  • Xsorus
    Xsorus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think I'll adopt the new (meaningless) definition of zerg...

    Here's me, my wife and a guildy wiping an AD ZERG™

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAoXgVezeb8

    Maybe I should start a thread about 3-manning the zerg. ;)

    As for a glimpse - near the end before I die :) - of what an actual zerg looks like...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIyCpcHsGo4

    Not to take anything away from you

    In the first video you're fighting next to a keep with enemies getting sieged while trying to kill you.

    In the second video, You're sitting inside a farm house with a bunch of other people from your side dumping oil on those that come in.

    Actually in the first, there was no siege defense. We did have the gate NPCs, but other than that we were alone at the keep. But, there was nothing amazing about our play. The 15+ AD just were unable/unwilling to attack in any coordinated way. So, by the definition asserted by the OP, the three of us wiped a zerg. :)

    In the second, I didn't mean to claim I had personally defeated a zerg. On the contrary - I was in an organized guild group - or "zerg" as some would call it. ;) I was just trying to illustrate the difference between an actual zerg (large numbers milling about outside and coming inside piecemeal to get killed) and an organized raid group (talking, coordinating, using synergies).

    In the first video, I clearly saw siege from your keep hitting the people you were fighting.

    But you are right about the 15 ad, they were unwilling to attack in a coordinated way,
    and they died..

    *edit*

    Also..24 man is a zerg...I don't know where this silly ass notion that 24 people isn't a zerg all of a sudden because its a guild group or what not..But it is.

    I'm thinking this developed from all the Terrible GW2 guilds who didn't want to show how bad they were in smaller numbers, thus decided that 25 man guild groups were the new thing.

    But anyway, 24 people in this game is 6 groups... 6...

    Its 3 Groups in DAOC...

    its 4 Groups in WAR

    its almost 5 in WoW/GW2

    In no game is 24 people not a zerg.



    Edited by Xsorus on May 16, 2014 9:23PM
  • Nooblet
    Nooblet
    ✭✭✭✭
    Lowbei wrote: »
    A. the 6man never claimed superiority, you implied it tho.

    B. Zerging is generally considered running with more than 10-15, as group sizes are determined by the game.

    C. Only an idiot would claim to have been zerged as a solo who died to a group.

    D. We have been known to let solos go, and even smallmans.

    E. Its obvious that you are a zerger by how defensive you are on this topic. no offense.

    If you are referring to me... I solo, group with guild, and also sometimes run with zerg taking keeps. I don't take things as serious as I did when I played daoc.

    Thinking you're better than everyone who runs with "zerg" is pretty ignorant.

    I'm not being defense, I made 1 post that the argument is all in the eyes of the beholder. There isn't some magic number that makes it a "zerg".

    You come across as an arrogant adolescent fyi.
    Edited by Nooblet on May 16, 2014 9:42PM
  • Nooblet
    Nooblet
    ✭✭✭✭
    Lowbei wrote: »
    nobody here has told you what # to run. i think you need to reread the OP lol

    this is about making you a better player, so that we have gvg competition later, and the start to making you a better player, is teaching you the difference between zergs and groups.

    for me, i wouldnt run with more than 8, ever. its easy to wipe your zerg with 6, so why would we want to split the points with more people?

    Why do you run more than a group? Just curious. Someone could easily make the exact argument you make by saying they only run with a group (4) and therefore you are bad.
    Edited by Nooblet on May 16, 2014 9:45PM
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    lol, actually, again, nobody said that the group was better... but you sure implied that its how you feel.

    if you feel that you are a good player capable of competing, then make smallman group and come prove it :)

    also, the fact that my sig shows that i have been pvping since 1997, proves that im likely not an adolescent. arrogance tho, im fine with that
    Edited by Lowbei on May 16, 2014 9:50PM
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nooblet wrote: »
    Lowbei wrote: »
    nobody here has told you what # to run. i think you need to reread the OP lol

    this is about making you a better player, so that we have gvg competition later, and the start to making you a better player, is teaching you the difference between zergs and groups.

    for me, i wouldnt run with more than 8, ever. its easy to wipe your zerg with 6, so why would we want to split the points with more people?

    Why do you run more than a group? Just curious. Someone could easily make the exact argument you make by saying they only run with a group (4) and therefore you are bad.


    indeed they could! and if there were actually 4mans out, we would drop it to 4 to make 4v4, but until then we run 4-6 depending what guildies are on.

    please make a 4man so we have a good reason to run 4 :wink:
  • Nooblet
    Nooblet
    ✭✭✭✭
    Lowbei wrote: »
    you can call it whatever you like, raid. zerg. etc. its all just free rps to me, as no good players would be caught dead in a zerg.

    That's a bit more than me "implying". And by your other posts it's pretty clear you think you are ATLEAST good.

    I could really care less, because this game is just turning into a raid ball ae spam contest. Eso is not a game to show off your superior competitive PvP. It is very limited in tactics/strategy.
  • lao
    lao
    ✭✭✭✭
    Nooblet wrote: »
    Lowbei wrote: »
    A. the 6man never claimed superiority, you implied it tho.

    B. Zerging is generally considered running with more than 10-15, as group sizes are determined by the game.

    C. Only an idiot would claim to have been zerged as a solo who died to a group.

    D. We have been known to let solos go, and even smallmans.

    E. Its obvious that you are a zerger by how defensive you are on this topic. no offense.

    If you are referring to me... I solo, group with guild, and also sometimes run with zerg taking keeps. I don't take things as serious as I did when I played daoc.

    Thinking you're better than everyone who runs with "zerg" is pretty ignorant.

    I'm not being defense, I made 1 post that the argument is all in the eyes of the beholder. There isn't some magic number that makes it a "zerg".

    You come across as an arrogant adolescent fyi.

    tbh ppl put way too much negativity in the word zerg. sure only noobs zerg and zerging is bad, all true but in the end of the day its just a term used to describe superior numbers in relation to ur own numbers. if ur solo and 3 ppl killed you. you got zerged. if ur 20 ppl and got killed by 100. u got zerged. thats just how it is. obviously 3 ppl in itself is not a zerg aslong as they dont "zerg" down soloers. its a matter of perspective.

    basically whenever u attack a force considerably smaller than ur own ur zerging, period. obviously the bigger your group is the more likely it is that u will end up zerging. thats why good players keep their groups small cos they dont wanna do that. truely good 6mans will also leave solos/duos/trios alone.
  • Lowbei
    Lowbei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nooblet wrote: »
    Lowbei wrote: »
    you can call it whatever you like, raid. zerg. etc. its all just free rps to me, as no good players would be caught dead in a zerg.

    That's a bit more than me "implying". And by your other posts it's pretty clear you think you are ATLEAST good.

    I could really care less, because this game is just turning into a raid ball ae spam contest. Eso is not a game to show off your superior competitive PvP. It is very limited in tactics/strategy.

    wait... so i made a post about how zergers should get better and make smallmans to make competition, and you are now saying that its a zerg only game, despite us clearly showing that zergs get farmed by good groups.

    lol we clearly proved that this isnt a zerg ball game, so either get better or get use to being farmed as free rps.
    Edited by Lowbei on May 16, 2014 10:10PM
  • lao
    lao
    ✭✭✭✭
    Lowbei wrote: »
    Nooblet wrote: »
    Lowbei wrote: »
    you can call it whatever you like, raid. zerg. etc. its all just free rps to me, as no good players would be caught dead in a zerg.

    That's a bit more than me "implying". And by your other posts it's pretty clear you think you are ATLEAST good.

    I could really care less, because this game is just turning into a raid ball ae spam contest. Eso is not a game to show off your superior competitive PvP. It is very limited in tactics/strategy.

    wait... so i made a post about how zergers should get better and make smallmans to make competition, and you are now saying that its a zerg only game, despite us clearly showing that zergs get farmed by good groups.

    lol we clearly proved that this isnt a zerg ball game, so either get better or get use to being farmed as free rps.

    he didnt say its a zerg game. he said its not a game for competitive pvp and he is 100% right. there is no skill in zergfarming in this game. absolutely none. zero, nada.

    i could train a batch of degenerated monkeys do the exact same thing u did in the video in less than a week. dont be fooled by the fact that the ppl ur fighting die like flies. thats not because ur super awesome or something. thats simply due to the fact that the majority of todays mmo players is far below a degenerated monkey in terms of intellect so when they meet a small group of like normal humans with a normal functioning brain they die just like that.

    u played DAoC appearantly so id like u to do this easy 3 steps analysis

    1) ask urself how much effort, coordination and flawless teamplay it took to farm zergs like that in DAoC.

    2) then take a deep breath. (this one is important cos u will burst into rage about ESO after step 3 if u dont do that)

    3) then think about how much effort and teamplay or any skill in general it takes in ESo to zergfarm when compared to DAoC.

    if u managed to not smash ur monitor in with ur keyboard after doing that let me know what ur conclusion is :>
  • Grimnix173
    Grimnix173
    ✭✭
    This dude is a troll, who lacks the ability to see things from other peoples perspectives. I challenged him to a 1v1 and he said no thanks.
This discussion has been closed.