I'll be real, kinda wild that it's one of the few (the only?) Vengeance abilities that retained both effects of both morphs.

And people wonder why people say there's a nightblade bias.

I think this points out a more overarching design concept. Maybe the skills should be more complete, but morphs only add other mechanical changes. For example something like vigor instead of being drastic differences, something along the lines of:

Heals you for X and group members for Y within 5m range. one morph would increase the range by 5m while the other increased the heal for yourself slightly.

compared to how polarized the current morphs are to the point where you are useless doing one form of gameplay to the next.

This is a lingering complaint from the first test.

It's imbalanced enough that there is a heal on cloak, but to make a full sized burst heal (the heal on cloak is stronger than sorcs matriarch self heal, like wtf) on top of no reliable counter to cloak (flare was still meh, even with vengeance tests much slower speed) and an absurdly short cooldown (did ZOS mix up the cooldown of surge and cloak, was cloak cooldown supposed to be 6 seconds while surge supposed to be 4?), has made cloak the most broken ability in the whole of vengeance. Even DK chains, while frustrating being pulled back into a zerg, is still tolerable for a duel or small scale battle, cloak as it is in vengeance is just absurd.

Even taking into account that vengeance is not supposed to be balanced, as it is a stress test for performance, the version of cloak that was implemented in vengeance just screams blatant favoritism/bias. Such blatant over the top favoritism/bias that should never happen within a professional development team working on a massive triple A game based on a hugely popular IP.