Joy_Division wrote: »

dark_hunterxmg wrote: »

Players that know how leap functions tend to exploit it and intentionally use the 3rd cc in their rotation. I see it frequently and I experience it frequently. I get cc'd and use a roll dodge that immediately gets canceled by a leap even though I have immunity. This skill could work like a normal gap closer, but it doesn't. Leap should be able to miss like any other ultimate.

And yet you defend Rush of Agony for not respecting CC immunity.

Core rule mechanics are real convenient to follow when you are the one getting chained CC, but meh, "just block" when a ball group uses RoA.

That's why core rules are core rules and need to be consistent across the board. CC immunity needs to be respected in every and all situations. Period.

My position is that if Rush of Agony is going to be fixed, then DK Leap needs to be fixed for the same reason. So many people want Rush of Agony fixed, but very little is ever said about Leap.

Leap is still a huge problem in pvp. Ignoring CC immunity is incredibly disruptive. This is far too much cc capability.

Yeah leap is just convoluted because they tried to check off too many boxes. Maybe its changed in recent years, but off the top of my head:

It is a single target instant gap closer....think of a copy of crit charge........So it is "dodgeable and miss-able"
EXCEPT
They dont want it to miss because they also want it to be an aoe, so they used the old "root" in place function of the old ambush spam to prevent the receiver from roll dodging the "single target" gap closer function.

Seriously we have working gap closers in the game, and we have working ground aoes in the game. Leap's gap closer part should be a copy and paste of crit charge. Leaps damage should be a copy and paste of pulsar with a stun.