Maintenance for the week of September 15:
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 15, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 16, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 16, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)

Fatecarver limitations..

ApexInterfectum
I’m writing as a longtime ESO player who is extremely disappointed with the Update 46 decision to cap Fatecarver’s beam at 6 targets.

This kind of hard AoE cap has been tried in other MMOs like World of Warcraft, and it was widely rejected by the playerbase because it ruins the fun and flow of large-scale gameplay. Here’s why this is a poor design move:

It punishes players who pull large packs and position skillfully. Instead of rewarding tactical play, it imposes an arbitrary ceiling.

It feels terrible in practice. Fatecarver is the Arcanist’s signature ability, and cutting off its impact past 6 enemies destroys the fantasy and power of the class.

It does not meaningfully improve performance. Server lag in big fights comes from engine and network load, not one class ability. This change is not going to fix the underlying issue.

It has already been tried and failed in WoW. Blizzard capped AoE abilities and had to walk it back later because players hated it. Please learn from that experience.

Arcanist is one of the most exciting additions to ESO in years. Please do not kneecap the class’s defining ability with an artificial limit that neither improves performance nor gameplay satisfaction simply because the sweaty try-hards of ESO find ways to make it "Game Breaking".
- Apex
  • xXEliotXx
    xXEliotXx
    Soul Shriven
    I do agree that HARD caps are a problem, I feel decreased damage past X targets might be better overall.
  • ApexInterfectum
    xXEliotXx wrote: »
    I do agree that HARD caps are a problem, I feel decreased damage past X targets might be better overall.

    That would be more than acceptable, [snip] They did the same thing to jabs.

    [edited for bashing]
    Edited by ZOS_Icy on June 2, 2025 4:44PM
    - Apex
  • El_Borracho
    El_Borracho
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    Agree. I also chuckled at "server lag" as a reason. I guess we're supposed to ignore the slide show that Cyrodiil turns into if more than 20 players decide to fight each other
  • Veinblood1965
    Veinblood1965
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Agree. I also chuckled at "server lag" as a reason. I guess we're supposed to ignore the slide show that Cyrodiil turns into if more than 20 players decide to fight each other

    Well I take care of that by killing the Arcanists first. Zero lag after that every time. Priorities are important.
Sign In or Register to comment.