Personofsecrets wrote: »I've had my share of these opponents. What's funny is getting blocked by them after criticizing them for their intentional BM.
A rivaling bad attitude archetype is when people pick Rajhiin and then get mad about one using the button. Yea, that patron and the button are unfun. So don't pick them for crying out loud!
spartaxoxo wrote: »Personofsecrets wrote: »I've had my share of these opponents. What's funny is getting blocked by them after criticizing them for their intentional BM.
A rivaling bad attitude archetype is when people pick Rajhiin and then get mad about one using the button. Yea, that patron and the button are unfun. So don't pick them for crying out loud!
There's an unspoken gentleman's agreement between a lot of players either to not use the button or not spam it. That some players feel the need to self-sabotage to balance the game in a way the devs won't says a lot about how toxic people find that strategy.
Personofsecrets wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »Personofsecrets wrote: »I've had my share of these opponents. What's funny is getting blocked by them after criticizing them for their intentional BM.
A rivaling bad attitude archetype is when people pick Rajhiin and then get mad about one using the button. Yea, that patron and the button are unfun. So don't pick them for crying out loud!
There's an unspoken gentleman's agreement between a lot of players either to not use the button or not spam it. That some players feel the need to self-sabotage to balance the game in a way the devs won't says a lot about how toxic people find that strategy.
That is quite a bad deck for gentlemens agreements since so many games lead to scummy wins via either the button, agent floods, or, worst of all, Pounce and Grand.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Personofsecrets wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »Personofsecrets wrote: »I've had my share of these opponents. What's funny is getting blocked by them after criticizing them for their intentional BM.
A rivaling bad attitude archetype is when people pick Rajhiin and then get mad about one using the button. Yea, that patron and the button are unfun. So don't pick them for crying out loud!
There's an unspoken gentleman's agreement between a lot of players either to not use the button or not spam it. That some players feel the need to self-sabotage to balance the game in a way the devs won't says a lot about how toxic people find that strategy.
That is quite a bad deck for gentlemens agreements since so many games lead to scummy wins via either the button, agent floods, or, worst of all, Pounce and Grand.
It's really only the patron spam that's under a gentleman's agreement. That other stuff is an example of poor balance but not toxic gameplay.
spartaxoxo wrote: »I think because the lead from those cards is already so great, additionally preventing your opponent from being able to even try to fight back is what pushes it from "overpowered" to toxic. But, that's just me. Others might have other reasons why they won't spam it. All I know is a lot of folks won't even if they pick it unless you start spamming first.
I personally just never pick Rahjiin