Personofsecrets wrote: »This is a reminder that the ranking system is bad at determining rank based on skill. This is a reminder that Sorcer-King cards were fiddled around with over and over and this type of thing is still possible.
That would make the deck way too generic and also completely useless, the crow can generate a great deal of power if someone manages to pull lots of gold, I have personally generated over 30 power with crow, but for Orgnum, the power is based on number of cards, so basically it is useless if it functions like crow.birdmann1230 wrote: »That patron should function like the crow and only be active when you don’t have it turned to you. I’ve never been beat by it that bad but the race to beat the patron is crazy.
Stafford197 wrote: »ToT would honestly be better if as a general rule, no Patrons could be used while in their Favored state.
Patron usage would become more strategic (like how usually we don’t immediately use Crow) and get rid of a lot of unfun strats…. especially stuff like Rahjiin and Orgnum spam.
GuuMoonRyoung wrote: »Stafford197 wrote: »ToT would honestly be better if as a general rule, no Patrons could be used while in their Favored state.
Patron usage would become more strategic (like how usually we don’t immediately use Crow) and get rid of a lot of unfun strats…. especially stuff like Rahjiin and Orgnum spam.
They would have to completely redesign ToT to achieve this, but I do agree that it could make the game much more strategic.