Whoever is responsible for demolishing my enthusiasm for this story.

Just finished it and I was like "what's even the point of my 2 years of questing?", you can't say to me that this is the ending... it's the most obvious thing everyone expected since the big reveal in Necrom. I was hoping for something much better, something we would have seen repercussion in future TES games or whatever.

I understand she's not mentioned in previous games which take place in the future, but really? It seriously had to be so?

Since January people were ready "to simp" for her, people were preparing their bags to transfer themselves permanently in Mirrormoor, and what have these poor souls left to adore?

So frustrated...!

Btw: take aside the ending, cancel the issues with fps cap etc... the rest is really good! This DLC had such a huge potential.

Todd Howard (portrayed by Hermaeus Mora) for exorcising the spirit of Michael Kirkbride (portraied by Ithelia and the multiverse)

Elsonso wrote: »

SkaiFaith wrote: »

Whoever is responsible for demolishing my enthusiasm for this story.

Just finished it and I was like "what's even the point of my 2 years of questing?", you can't say to me that this is the ending... it's the most obvious thing everyone expected since the big reveal in Necrom. I was hoping for something much better, something we would have seen repercussion in future TES games or whatever.

I understand she's not mentioned in previous games which take place in the future, but really? It seriously had to be so?

Since January people were ready "to simp" for her, people were preparing their bags to transfer themselves permanently in Mirrormoor, and what have these poor souls left to adore?

So frustrated...!

If ZOS is being a responsible steward of Daedric Prince Lore, this was a story where we knew that it had to end with certain things that happened.

ZOS weaved a brand new Prince into the Lore and made it compatible with the TES single player game Lore.

Still I think it could have been handled differently, unless... I can't continue without entering spoilers territory so I'll just stop.

cyclonus11 wrote: »

The presence or absence of choice does not exclude one from being an antagonist.

That's true.

But since I had to choose one for the poll, I chose the one I found worst, because he actually had agency about his doings.