In your opinion, what is the class with the least successful branches? Did you expect something...

Alharion · October 2023

In your opinion, what is the class with the least successful branches? Did you expect something else from it?

For my part, it is the guard who disappoints me in part, so I grant him, he is not totally missed, for example, the second branch is very pretty, but for the others, I would have thought this differently.

For example the first branch would be more with brambles for DPS, in this regard the arcanist to spells that I imagined in this sense for the keeper, the second branch is the most beautiful of the keeper, there is not much retouched, on the other hand the 3ᵉ to which ice extends lost on this class, I would have seen instead a theme around the rock and some ideas like runic stones (engraved ritual) of druid and things like that that than a thematic ice...

Another point I also saw more animals like the wolf, the bear (well there is at least him already) and an Indrik who could have made a charge and left behind a path of heal for the group (for example) This is what I had as a vision for the keeper/Druid, for me.

ZOS_Icy · October 2023

Greetings,

After further review we have decided to move this thread to a category we think is more appropriate for this topic.

Thank you for your understanding.

LunaFlora · October 2023

what?
we don't have keeper or druid classes.
and what are branches of classes?

Soarora · October 2023

LunaFlora wrote: »

what?
we don't have keeper or druid classes.
and what are branches of classes?

I think they’re talking about wardens and the skill lines? I think OP might’ve used a translation app or something because warden —> guard and warden —> keeper makes sense then. That said, wardens aren’t Druids. They are weird in that they’re Vvardenfell based but have ice, plant, and animal lines but I guess the point is to be anti-Vvardenfell (since we already have DK).
Splitting warden up into 3 different classes could be interesting but only if we got class change tokens and we’re not getting that.
Edit: or if ZOS were to take a page from gw2’s book and make advanced classes. That’d be fun but even more to balance.

LunaFlora · October 2023

Soarora wrote: »

LunaFlora wrote: »

what?
we don't have keeper or druid classes.
and what are branches of classes?

I think they’re talking about wardens and the skill lines? I think OP might’ve used a translation app or something because warden —> guard and warden —> keeper makes sense then. That said, wardens aren’t Druids. They are weird in that they’re Vvardenfell based but have ice, plant, and animal lines but I guess the point is to be anti-Vvardenfell (since we already have DK).
Splitting warden up into 3 different classes could be interesting but only if we got class change tokens and we’re not getting that.
Edit: or if ZOS were to take a page from gw2’s book and make advanced classes. That’d be fun but even more to balance.

ah makes zense

Alharion · October 2023

yes i meant "warden"sorry, translation is bad, i didn't pay attention...

aru · October 2023

Soarora wrote: »

They are weird in that they’re Vvardenfell based but have ice, plant, and animal lines but I guess the point is to be anti-Vvardenfell (since we already have DK).

Dragonknights are not Vvardenfell based, they are Akaviri based.

Araneae6537 · October 2023

I agree, the warden feels like too many disparate things combined into one class. I would have liked to see a warden/ranger class and a separate cryomancer class (maybe also some water themed abilities or something else in addition to frost magic). It would be fun to have additional plant based abilities, play a tank that can ensnare with roots, etc. And likewise it would be fun to have a more offensive ice mage option. Also, while I like the Morrowind theme for most of the animal abilities (the stupid bear does not fit), it really doesn’t make sense for every race and both Bosmer and Bretons come to mind as having traditions of nature magic and different animal summons would make more sense for them.

Zodiarkslayer · October 2023

I don't get it ...
Even knowing the translator thingy, it is still a tough read. I see four sentences and do not get the purpose of a single one.

Araneae6537 · October 2023

aru wrote: »

Soarora wrote: »

They are weird in that they’re Vvardenfell based but have ice, plant, and animal lines but I guess the point is to be anti-Vvardenfell (since we already have DK).

Dragonknights are not Vvardenfell based, they are Akaviri based.

I believe @Soarora was saying that fire/lava would have made more sense than ice for a Vvardenfell-themed class but Dragonknight already had fire type abilities.

SandandStars · November 2023

NBs should have a swarm of flies circling them