SilverBride wrote: »ESO+ perks are conveniences for those who support the game by subscribing. These should remain part of the subscription.

If you don't have "Pay for Convenience" in a game where subscriptions are optional, then you'll have "Pay to Win". I know which I prefer.
I fully understand that some players don't want to pay a subscription or can't afford to do so, and that's fine. What I don't understand is the expectation that they should enjoy all the things that are benefits of subscribing without doing so.
'I pay for perks' doesn't make a lot of sense as a reply to 'make this perk free'.
You'll still get the perk.
And also the all the dlc you pay for as part of the sub.
Make the resources bag free.
Seriously; I have tried to get about 15 gaming buddies into ESO over the years. You know what happens when they see the limited bag/bank space, and realize crafting mats take up that space?
"It's decent, but I don't like the limited inventory. And I don't give money to give my money to games that pressure me to pay by making gameplay worse for non-payers."
I'd bet that, for every 1 person that signs up for ESO+, there's an average of 10 who skip the game entirely because of 'pay for convenience'.
Every gamer I've talked too can accept a paid account to unlock all DLC and the crowns allowance, and the EXP boost & crafting timer boost. Those are BONUSES. But they balk at being strong-armed by making the free2play experience actively WORSE with limited space and crafting being so integral.
Seriously; Make the crafting bag free, and you reach more players. More players = more chances to hook people = more people possibly buying ESO+.
Do, like, a 6 month trial run or something; See if numbers go up. It's can't hurt to try.
SilverBride wrote: »The value of the subscription goes down if perks are removed from it.
If a player wants these perks they need to subscribe.
Swap the craft bag for faster mount levelling, and the option to re skin combat pets. There are plenty of things that could be made part of a sub. that aren't so limiting to game play for starter players.
Make the resources bag free.
I'd bet that, for every 1 person that signs up for ESO+, there's an average of 10 who skip the game entirely because of 'pay for convenience'.
Fenris_Arainai wrote: »
Swap the craft bag for faster mount levelling, and the option to re skin combat pets. There are plenty of things that could be made part of a sub. that aren't so limiting to game play for starter players.
And how long until "faster mount levelling, and the option to re skin combat pets should not be tied to subscription, and should be free" threads?
Not mentioning fast levelling od mounts would have only limited value due to characters eventually levelling fully. Then you pay for something doesn't even apply to you.
Holycannoli wrote: »The crafting bag is one of the two main selling points of ESO+, the other being access to everything but the latest chapter and the DLC classes.
Except it was the same way back then it was sub only. Except then we had PvE storage mounts and PvP speed mounts and you better swap before going to Cyrodil, and gold was way more rare, played for almost an year and did not max out my bank even if high priority, made a lot of bank alt. But the inventory mini game was probably why I dropped ESO shortly after an year.TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »The game 100% bombards you with crap that you're incentivised to pick up. If that weren't the case they wouldn't be selling a portable merchant, banker and decon assistant. ZOS knows what they're doing
To much work.
Off topic as its an spacecraft in Kerbal space program breaking up entering Mars atmosphere but I say its its the prefect art to show how most feel ZoS balancing work.