JJMaxx1980 wrote: »ZOS is not referring to accessibility in the way that refers to disability. In the context of the game, ZOS refers to accessibility as newer players or players with less optimized builds having the same 'access' to content as veteran players.@JJMaxx1980
"Mythic Items
Oakensoul: This item set now also grants you Minor Slayer, Minor Aegis, and Empower.
Developer Comment:
Spoiler
We’ve been keeping a close eye on Oakensoul’s heated debates throughout the PTS cycle where the nerfs were noted as justified in PvP environments, but ultimately hit the set a bit too hard in some PvE scenarios. We opted to avoid enabling too much damage on the set by adding the Major versions of Slayer or Aegis, as those buffs are meant to be sourced from trial sets and to encourage coordinated behavior for groups. Instead, we went with the much more readily available Minor versions to help out players who may not have access to trials gear (or just have other sets they’d rather run!). In addition, we wanted to add the new Empower buff, which is by design now focused on helping accessibility – just like this ring is – so it was a stars aligning moment that we think will drastically help the set claw back some of its power, without showing up on veteran player’s bars as frequently as we saw."
Source: https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/613645/pts-patch-notes-v8-1-3
You're very much welcome
JJMaxx1980 wrote: »
ZOS is not referring to accessibility in the way that refers to disability. In the context of the game, ZOS refers to accessibility as newer players or players with less optimized builds having the same 'access' to content as veteran players.
See this video by Dottz to show you what ZOS is speaking about.
https://youtu.be/EU_rpgIU1vA
JJMaxx1980 wrote: »ZOS is not referring to accessibility in the way that refers to disability. In the context of the game, ZOS refers to accessibility as newer players or players with less optimized builds having the same 'access' to content as veteran players.
JJMaxx1980 wrote: »ZOS is not referring to accessibility in the way that refers to disability. In the context of the game, ZOS refers to accessibility as newer players or players with less optimized builds having the same 'access' to content as veteran players.
I agree. While it may improve access for those who have a disability, the intent seems to be much broader and includes anyone that is having difficulty reaching harder end game content.
(Thank you for your sharings @Tia413 )
You're very Welcome
I am actually a very nice person but I really can't stand it when people who aren't Disabled attack things that are designed to help Disabled people.
Some of us, no matter our Disabilities still want to live. To take part in things we used to be able to do, but can't do as well now. Or we are limited to our Homes, and so thereforth the Internet and all it has to offer has became our new form of life.
Even though we know we may never be able to play all parts of a game it is both Healing and Therapeutic. And ofc, much more fun than sitting in a rocking chair and twiddling our thumbs or feeling sorry for ourselves
I refuse to just throw in the towel on life and sit in a rocking chair twiddling my thumbs. I am a fighter and I will fight for my Rights as a Disabled person whom lives in the USA.
I appreciate Game Companies like ZOS who try to find a way to include us Disabled people in their game.
JJMaxx1980 wrote: »ZOS is not referring to accessibility in the way that refers to disability. In the context of the game, ZOS refers to accessibility as newer players or players with less optimized builds having the same 'access' to content as veteran players.
I agree. While it may improve access for those who have a disability, the intent seems to be much broader and includes anyone that is having difficulty reaching harder end game content.
To both of you I can only say this.....only ZOS knows what they meant by "Accessibility".
And I would be surprised if they actually included the Disabled in it.
Although it would look good for them if they did to those of us who fight every day in the USA to have the same Rights and Accessibility Options to things as everyone else has.
I really am a nice person but when it comes to something I believe in I take a Stand and Fight for it.
And the Oakensoul Ring helps this Disabled person to be able to play this game better and to achieve things I didnt think I would be able to achieve any longer.
Why can't others just be happy for me and for the others who use the ring for the right reasons?
Peace! Out.
The splash from tri focus should just be halved. And not scale on the model, this would fix all empower problems. The 2nd problem is tankyness, I think it should just receive the sneak function where oakensoul has one set of buffs or the other. This way you don't have 100k dps tanks, which is really the bigger problem. Many of the buffs are buffs 2 bar dds in no way has access to like aegis. The tankyness and splash is what makes oakensoul preferred for trials like AS over any other type of build atm. 100k single target dps with little to no effort is fine, as said a million times, 2 bar has more ST at the top. 100k aoe dps the size of the entire room while having more damage mitigation than the main tank, is problematic. Because tri focus does 100% splash damage mini bosses in AS die extremely quickly, therefore you can now forgoe the OT role and bring an extra dd, this could mean that an oakensoul group might take the AS World Record, and that defeats the entire Oakensoul narrative.
JJMaxx1980 wrote: »Nobody is saying they are not happy for you. You do you. But saying that the Oakensoul ring is for disabled people is demeaning and completely untrue. Even people in this thread have said that people are 'abusing' this item if they use it without being disabled. ZOS have never used the word 'disabled' and it is implied that 'accessibility' refers to players who for one reason or another do not have the ability to successfully interact with the LA weaving mechanic.
It is healthy to have more than one single playstyle available to players. If people who are naturally gifted and can do 130k dps using a LA build, that's awesome. If people can learn how to weave using HA and do 95k dps and gain access to endgame content, that's also awesome.
JJMaxx1980 wrote: »
Nobody is saying they are not happy for you. You do you. But saying that the Oakensoul ring is for disabled people is demeaning and completely untrue. Even people in this thread have said that people are 'abusing' this item if they use it without being disabled. ZOS have never used the word 'disabled' and it is implied that 'accessibility' refers to players who for one reason or another do not have the ability to successfully interact with the LA weaving mechanic.
It is healthy to have more than one single playstyle available to players. If people who are naturally gifted and can do 130k dps using a LA build, that's awesome. If people can learn how to weave using HA and do 95k dps and gain access to endgame content, that's also awesome.
JJMaxx1980 wrote: »ZOS is not referring to accessibility in the way that refers to disability. In the context of the game, ZOS refers to accessibility as newer players or players with less optimized builds having the same 'access' to content as veteran players.
I agree. While it may improve access for those who have a disability, the intent seems to be much broader and includes anyone that is having difficulty reaching harder end game content.
To both of you I can only say this.....only ZOS knows what they meant by "Accessibility".
And I would be surprised if they actually included the Disabled in it.
And the Oakensoul Ring helps this Disabled person to be able to play this game better and to achieve things I didnt think I would be able to achieve any longer.
Why can't others just be happy for me and for the others who use the ring for the right reasons?
JJMaxx1980 wrote: »ZOS is not referring to accessibility in the way that refers to disability. In the context of the game, ZOS refers to accessibility as newer players or players with less optimized builds having the same 'access' to content as veteran players.
I agree. While it may improve access for those who have a disability, the intent seems to be much broader and includes anyone that is having difficulty reaching harder end game content.
To both of you I can only say this.....only ZOS knows what they meant by "Accessibility".
And I would be surprised if they actually included the Disabled in it.
I agree. Also, I want to point out that "Disabled" does not necessarily mean "Unable". This makes the broader use of "Accessibility" more interesting, as someone who might get labeled as "Disabled" but does not think of themselves as "Disabled" may not even be interested in these things.
True, you make a valid point here. Personally I would rather just say up front that I am Disabled and may not be able to perform as well as expected in a dungeon or w/e than to have Toxicity spewed all over me because I didn't. But I just don't trust people on games as much as I used to, so I avoid group content as much as possible. I now just try to help others by answering questions in zone chat or by sending mats to someone that asked in zone chat. It fulfills my Social Interaction needs that I lack due to having Social Anxiety Disorder.And the Oakensoul Ring helps this Disabled person to be able to play this game better and to achieve things I didnt think I would be able to achieve any longer.
Why can't others just be happy for me and for the others who use the ring for the right reasons?
Personally, more than happy that Oakensoul is working for you!
Thank you Elsonso for the nice words
I love the premise of Oakensoul, for whatever reason that ZOS had for "Accessibility". There needs to be a mechanism to counter the two-bar rotations that have been built in the game. Just based on early interviews about the game, I am of the opinion that two-bar rotations were not on the white board when they designed in the ability to have two weapons handy. My gut tells me that players invented this, and ZOS went along with it. Whether they thought it was a good idea, or some quirky adaptation by players, is unknown to me. In any case, they didn't stop it, and seem to have embraced it, so it is nice to have a mechanism in the game that allows single-bar combat without sacrificing tons of content.
It was 2 bar when I started playing in August of 2016, so IDK.
Disclaimer: I use a single bar on XBox, and have since before Oakensoul. I *** at using controllers and not having to swap weapons allows me to actually focus on killing things.
FrancisCrawford wrote: »The splash from tri focus should just be halved. And not scale on the model, this would fix all empower problems. The 2nd problem is tankyness, I think it should just receive the sneak function where oakensoul has one set of buffs or the other. This way you don't have 100k dps tanks, which is really the bigger problem. Many of the buffs are buffs 2 bar dds in no way has access to like aegis. The tankyness and splash is what makes oakensoul preferred for trials like AS over any other type of build atm. 100k single target dps with little to no effort is fine, as said a million times, 2 bar has more ST at the top. 100k aoe dps the size of the entire room while having more damage mitigation than the main tank, is problematic. Because tri focus does 100% splash damage mini bosses in AS die extremely quickly, therefore you can now forgoe the OT role and bring an extra dd, this could mean that an oakensoul group might take the AS World Record, and that defeats the entire Oakensoul narrative.
A whole lightning attack doesn't splash. Half the damage or a little more? Maybe; I haven't run in a trial setting. But all? No way.
The "whole room" part would surprise me, unless it's a very small room.
As for 10% or whatever damage reduction being a huge game-breaking deal -- I'll take your word for that part.
I always find these conversations interesting but have one questions for anyone speaking out against the various oakensoul builds. I have 2 OS builds and 4 non OS builds for reference.
Do you use any combat or PVP addons? If so what is the difference? *bows down to the console peeps* not speaking of you guys here.
Oakensoul gives some combat buffs and helps to simplify the rotation so you can pay attention to mechanics and kill things faster. How is that any different than raid notifier or any other addon telling you to block, roll dodge move etc.? That is a crutch as much as using a HA build to have access to content, gear achievements.
It's very timely that TheJimquisition just happened to upload a video last night about some of the backlash against accessibility options in games and the question of who should be able to enjoy games (as in, why not everyone).
There's a whole slew of quotables from the video and it was very interesting to see the way some developers are taking on the idea of making games more accessible (like the really weird ring system in FFXIV) that but the quote that stuck was:
"The sneering at difficulty and accessibility settings and the argument that you should just be better at games essentially communicate that people who need help are inherently inferior." -JSS
None of that is really the point. No one should have OS. It is still over the top and never should have been added to the game.
OS is the answer to a question no one asked. What happens is players get OS and they get stop learning. If you want to be strong and good at this game, drop OS, delete it, walk away from it and learn how things really work.
For example, in every one of my builds, I get everything I need without OS and have another bar that's useful as well. OS is wasteful and leads to power creap because people have buffs that they don't even need or will rarely use. OS is like ZOS apologizing for players not being smart enough to make a build, so they give you a (1)pc set that is so over powered and not grounded its not even funny. No critical thinking, problem solving or real work involved. Not to mention as I've seen before many OS users have no idea what half of those buffs even do or how they relate to gameplay.
To me when people go on about OS it means you don't know how to make a proper build. You don't know what you're doing, you don't want to learn and you want to spend a short, very very brief amount of time and work tracking down (1) Mythic so you can have it do the thinking for you. I don't mean to be smug here however I have such a low opinion of OS its not even funny and anyone who gets too comfortable using it does themselves a great disservice in the long run. Especially if certain things change in the game you will not understand how to adapt.
Just like with DK Wings from back in the day, I shoot down folks all the time thinking OS is the big answer and it lets them down every... single... time. Just like back in the day with those other DK who thought DK Wings was the big answer to everything. They died even faster.
[edited to remove quote]
People like you make me so very angry! Where is the respect for people with Disabilities in anything you said? Why don't you direct your anger over the misuse of the Oakensoul ring at the people in the game who are misusing it and aren't disabled?
You speak like you expect nothing but Non Disabled people to be allowed to play this game. Correct me if I am wrong.
Not all of us live Normal lives....some of us were born with Birth Defects, some of us had RL things happen to us that caused our Disabilities (accidents at work, car accidents, injuries incurred by the aggressive acts of another person... to name a few), and some of us have had Strokes (which a person has no control over preventing happening at any age).
It does not make us so stupid that we can't play a video game nor less capable of being able to play a video game. It just means we have limitations to how we can play said video game. And some games, some of us just can't play at all.
I myself suffer from 2 sets of those above mentioned types of Disabilities and it caused me to lose a vast majority of my Motor Impulses (hand to brain connection). 1 I will discuss, the other I won't.
At 31 yrs of age I had a Stroke ...I lost the ability to ever be a 4.0 student again. My IQ even now is lower than what it was. I had to re-learn how to Speak, Walk, do simple Math, Read, Write, Drink, Feed myself, to do normal every day things, etc. And I couldn't even recognize my own children. I used to be able to type 80WPM without looking at my keys. Now I can barely type 40WPM and I have to look at my keys to even type. I use to be able to play Console games, but I lost the ability to use a Controller. But I accept that! I could have just sat there and felt sorry for myself and let myself wither away or I could fight to regain as much of my old self as I could and appreciate the fact that I was still alive. And I chose to fight it.
****
I am not writing this to get you to feel sorry for me...I don't want your sympathy. I am just hoping that I can get you and others to realize LIFE is hard enough for Disabled people already...that doesn't mean you have to make it even harder for us
It does not mean I am stupid, it just means I am limited in how my Neurological responses are received in my brain and my reaction time is slower because of that and I have to find other ways to do things I used to be able to do.
And I definitely SHOULD not be limited on being able to play a online game just because I am disabled and am unable to use 2 bars to play the game the way YOU think I should play it ( My Way or the Highway form of thinking)or my build isn't the Preferred or w/e ya'll call it build! Nor because I can't use WASD to move and have to use my Up and Down Arrow keys on my Keyboard to only move Forwards or Backwards. And my Mouse to turn my Camera Angle. My NUM keys for my skills. Nor because my Neurological responses don't afford me the time to Block or Dodge incoming attacks.
I accept that I will never be able to do Trials and Group Dungeons, because of the One Way form of thinking so many people like you have in this game. So.....IDC.
I still enjoy the game. I still enjoy running my 1 bar build(as I have since starting the game back in 2016) and swapping out skills from time to time just to see which is a more viable skill. And because of my Trial and Error method I managed to find 2 sets of gear that work out wonderfully for me and I am not only a 1 bar build....I am also a pet-less MagSorc build who just got the Oakensoul Ring a week ago. The Oakensoul Ring opened up new possibilities for me that I had been afraid to try Solo like WB's and PD's. It gave me more things to do now and I love it.
(EDUCATE YOURSELF) Here in the USA the Disabled have Rights by this ......Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act or the Americans with Disabilities Act, both of which require accessibility and are meant to prevent discrimination of individuals with disabilities.
According to data provided by Sayfarth Shaw, since 2015, the number of accessibility lawsuits has increased by almost 10-fold, with almost half of those relating to organizations in retails and online sales.
The 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 requires accessible communication options to be available in television, video, and streaming services. It wasn't until 2019, however, that this act finally applied to video games.
[url="https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2019/05/09/passionate-video-gamers-dont-let-their-disabilities-stop-them/3661312002/[/url]
https://accessibility.com/blog/the-state-of-accessibility-in-gaming-in-2021
[url="https://www.forbes.com/sites/lakenbrooks/2021/10/13/disabled-gamers-are-using-video-games-for-self-care/?sh=390914ce6884tp://[/url]
Embrace us instead of Shunning us because.....Disabled people are here to stay like it or not!
And I applaud ZOS for creating a way to make it easier for those of us with Disabilities to be able to play TESO!
I have no interest at all in "going further". Oakensoul enables me to deal with combat that's not intuitive, or interesting, or viable for me.
Some of us - like me - just want to have fun in this game. Without elitists attemptiing to put us down for not "going further".
Hmmm. You just wnt to have fun ok. But lemme ask you a question. If I had a ring that gave me a ton of buffs and unlocks things that are supposed to be behind other sets and I own you in combat then you would say its not fair that I have an advantage that I neither earned nor deserve.
And that's where we're coming from. Its not fair for someone to have all this power in one item and succeed in combat gameplay that as you said, to 'you' its not intuitive, or interesting or viable for you so why do it in the first place? Do you see what I'm saying. You're not happy about combat so you lean on your ring to prove a point to the rest of us who do find PvP intuitive, interesting and viable.
There is a difference. Its not just all about you and 'your fun' when it stacks the odds against other players. Moreover, just because you have Oak doesn't make up for not understanding how PvP works, esp if you hate it to begin with you're going to really hate losing to ppl who know more than you without the ring.
If you had that ring, I'd care the same as if you didn't....
Honestly, Oakensoul dies in PVP .... I have seen it, and done it .. the number of dead single bar players my NightBlade has left behind is pretty long......
I've tried using it in PVP --- I have died to a good player with a 2 bar setup, EVERY SINGLE TIME....
It works best in PVE .... seriously... don't like it, then leave and find another group ..... easy enough.
Of course, we could also fix the one, seriously, broken part of the game that is, pretty much, an exploit .....
Animation cancelling, and breaking the Global Cool Down with light attacks... put them on the same GCD at one second as everything else..... it shouldn't be that people that wiggle faster can somehow do more damage... or that master some rythm.
Auldwulfe
/script JumpToSpecificHouse("@Starbridge84", 71)
I have no interest at all in "going further". Oakensoul enables me to deal with combat that's not intuitive, or interesting, or viable for me.
Some of us - like me - just want to have fun in this game. Without elitists attemptiing to put us down for not "going further".
Hmmm. You just wnt to have fun ok. But lemme ask you a question. If I had a ring that gave me a ton of buffs and unlocks things that are supposed to be behind other sets and I own you in combat then you would say its not fair that I have an advantage that I neither earned nor deserve.
And that's where we're coming from. Its not fair for someone to have all this power in one item and succeed in combat gameplay that as you said, to 'you' its not intuitive, or interesting or viable for you so why do it in the first place? Do you see what I'm saying. You're not happy about combat so you lean on your ring to prove a point to the rest of us who do find PvP intuitive, interesting and viable.
There is a difference. Its not just all about you and 'your fun' when it stacks the odds against other players. Moreover, just because you have Oak doesn't make up for not understanding how PvP works, esp if you hate it to begin with you're going to really hate losing to ppl who know more than you without the ring.
If you had that ring, I'd care the same as if you didn't....
Honestly, Oakensoul dies in PVP .... I have seen it, and done it .. the number of dead single bar players my NightBlade has left behind is pretty long......
I've tried using it in PVP --- I have died to a good player with a 2 bar setup, EVERY SINGLE TIME....
It works best in PVE .... seriously... don't like it, then leave and find another group ..... easy enough.
Of course, we could also fix the one, seriously, broken part of the game that is, pretty much, an exploit .....
Animation cancelling, and breaking the Global Cool Down with light attacks... put them on the same GCD at one second as everything else..... it shouldn't be that people that wiggle faster can somehow do more damage... or that master some rythm.
Auldwulfe
Yeah and that's why I do somewhat agree with JohnAlterat's point of view. In learning ESO, it actually can be alot to take in, especially when mixed with one's job/family/daily routine.
So in that regard OS is fine as like a bridge between here and there. Conceptually, while I never used OS there was another set that was my bridge for awhile, DKS Dreugh King Slayer. Its a good set and I had fun like going thru FG to get it, doing so helped develop my skills as an early tank.
However. Its very important to note that this set ultimately was the bottle neck that held me back. And as I discovered there was much more to the game once I gave this up and opened all the doors and windows so to speak *chuckles*.
If I had stayed on this set, I would be years behind. Still not a bad set, just like OS might be viewed the same way, though I am not trying to draw any parallel between these two sets other than that from a metaphorical perspective in what they represent.
Ultimately, everyone has to move on. Enjoy your time with OS but for those inclined don't let that set own you, be prepared to move on for greater things at some point.
Oakensoul power has not been gifted to everyone for free.
One has to purchase Greymoor, High Isle, Murkmire...
One has to level up Scrying and Excavation...
One has to clear Volcanic Vents, which we should admit are not easy to solo for low level player, especially when Necrom will come out and last year zones will become desert. I am CP 1.800 and WITH Oakensoul I can clear them solo, but I happened to see higher level players without Oakensoul attempting to solo them and fail badly.
To optimize the build one has to clear several times different Group Dungeons, take Bastian to Max Level (Blackwood purchase), and be able to slot specific CPs which requires to be high level.
FrancisCrawford wrote: »The splash from tri focus should just be halved. And not scale on the model, this would fix all empower problems. The 2nd problem is tankyness, I think it should just receive the sneak function where oakensoul has one set of buffs or the other. This way you don't have 100k dps tanks, which is really the bigger problem. Many of the buffs are buffs 2 bar dds in no way has access to like aegis. The tankyness and splash is what makes oakensoul preferred for trials like AS over any other type of build atm. 100k single target dps with little to no effort is fine, as said a million times, 2 bar has more ST at the top. 100k aoe dps the size of the entire room while having more damage mitigation than the main tank, is problematic. Because tri focus does 100% splash damage mini bosses in AS die extremely quickly, therefore you can now forgoe the OT role and bring an extra dd, this could mean that an oakensoul group might take the AS World Record, and that defeats the entire Oakensoul narrative.
A whole lightning attack doesn't splash. Half the damage or a little more? Maybe; I haven't run in a trial setting. But all? No way.
The "whole room" part would surprise me, unless it's a very small room.
As for 10% or whatever damage reduction being a huge game-breaking deal -- I'll take your word for that part.
Tri focus is 100% of the damage splash and I have seen mini bosses in AS on the other side of the room hit by the splash because it scales off the hit box and Saint Olms is huge, same on tellaria you hit everything else.
Genuine question: if right now the state of Oakensoul is "fair enough" but it is "slightly overpowered" only when put in synergy with specific Heavy Attack sets... Wouldn't it be better to adjust said sets bonuses instead of touching Oakensoul or Empower or the Lightning staff passives?
I'm sure there's people like me utilizing Oakensoul + Empower + Lightning staff BUT still being in the 60-70K DPS because they don't want to get the specific Heavy Attack sets and just want to use other sets they enjoy more.
So, wouldn't it be unfair to them (us) nerfing Oakensoul/Empower/Lightning staff passives, when the problem only happen when in synergy with those specific Heavy Attack sets?
I'm genuinely asking if this sounds more legitimate or crazy, I've made this thought up just now...
P.s. I'm not stating it has to be done either, to be clear.
/script JumpToSpecificHouse("@Starbridge84", 71)