-1
the vocal minority on the forum and the people who joined ZOS for a paycheck know what's better to put in the game than the community who have played since it started.
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
This is the issue. We never really know if [snip] listens to our feedback. An in-game poll would be black and white data. Forums on the other hand are probably the least reliable source of feedback.
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
This is the issue. We never really know if [snip] listens to our feedback. An in-game poll would be black and white data. Forums on the other hand are probably the least reliable source of feedback.
If you think ZoS is ignoring the players now then what makes you think any different about an in game poll? We still wouldn't know if the results were given any real consideration.
Again I don't think we are ignored. Sometimes we simply don't like the answers.
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
This is the issue. We never really know if [snip] listens to our feedback. An in-game poll would be black and white data. Forums on the other hand are probably the least reliable source of feedback.
If you think ZoS is ignoring the players now then what makes you think any different about an in game poll? We still wouldn't know if the results were given any real consideration.
Again I don't think we are ignored. Sometimes we simply don't like the answers.
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
This is the issue. We never really know if [snip] listens to our feedback. An in-game poll would be black and white data. Forums on the other hand are probably the least reliable source of feedback.
If you think ZoS is ignoring the players now then what makes you think any different about an in game poll? We still wouldn't know if the results were given any real consideration.
Again I don't think we are ignored. Sometimes we simply don't like the answers.
I forgot to mention that in-game polls in other MMO's give an answer. They show how many people voted in total, and which was the most popular vote. The developers act on this, I don't see why [snip] wouldn't
SammyKhajit wrote: »SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
This is the issue. We never really know if [snip] listens to our feedback. An in-game poll would be black and white data. Forums on the other hand are probably the least reliable source of feedback.
If you think ZoS is ignoring the players now then what makes you think any different about an in game poll? We still wouldn't know if the results were given any real consideration.
Again I don't think we are ignored. Sometimes we simply don't like the answers.
I forgot to mention that in-game polls in other MMO's give an answer. They show how many people voted in total, and which was the most popular vote. The developers act on this, I don't see why [snip] wouldn't
OP, out of curiosity have players tried to stack the votes (as in, get all their guild mates and friends to vote one way) with those other games? That could be the major downside as you have in-game voting wars happening
You go to a restaurant to tell the chef how to cook your meal? Or you pick a restaurant, eat what's on the menu and go to another restaurant next time when you didn't like what you got? You can give feedback ingame. Maybe someone will read it. We don't know, because nobody talks to us. Until we have free replicators and holodecks, like in Star Trek, we will have to buy what we can get. Unfortunately. But things change. In some fast food restaurants you can already build your own burger. So why not. Maybe it's worth a shot.
Not at all. Every time the devs acted on a vote, people genuinely liked it and we had a very positive outcome. People aren't so easily influenced on a video game - we're not forced at gunpoint to vote a certain way even though we disagree with it lol. Votes would be anonymous of course.
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
This is the issue. We never really know if [snip] listens to our feedback. An in-game poll would be black and white data. Forums on the other hand are probably the least reliable source of feedback.
If you think ZoS is ignoring the players now then what makes you think any different about an in game poll? We still wouldn't know if the results were given any real consideration.
Again I don't think we are ignored. Sometimes we simply don't like the answers.
Of course [snip] are going to ignore individual written feedback on forums - it would take far too much time to address all these posts. Simple data from a poll would be much better for them
SilverBride wrote: »A poll only collects what players say they want. Tracking what they are actually doing in game gives a much more accurate picture.
SilverBride wrote: »A poll only collects what players say they want. Tracking what they are actually doing in game gives a much more accurate picture.
SilverBride wrote: »A poll only collects what players say they want. Tracking what they are actually doing in game gives a much more accurate picture.
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
This is the issue. We never really know if [snip] listens to our feedback. An in-game poll would be black and white data. Forums on the other hand are probably the least reliable source of feedback.
If you think ZoS is ignoring the players now then what makes you think any different about an in game poll? We still wouldn't know if the results were given any real consideration.
Again I don't think we are ignored. Sometimes we simply don't like the answers.
Of course [snip] are going to ignore individual written feedback on forums - it would take far too much time to address all these posts. Simple data from a poll would be much better for them
Just as they would ignore one responder to the poll. We know they listen to what is said in the forums and elsewhere because we see their responses. We also see the results. Sometimes we do not like the results. Doesn't mean they didn't consider what we said. They do send out polls so they do have data to look at. They also can look at what players are doing in game to see what is popular and what is not. If you kill a world boss they have that data somewhere they can take a look at.
I am not opposed to in game polls if they are not obtrusive. Maybe something on the character select page we can choose to click on if we want. I just don't see what some think it will accomplish. A new way of telling them we don't want account wide achievements isn't going to stop them from doing account wide achievements if they feel account wide achievements will be good for the game.
The problem with a poll is in determining if a good cross section of players is represented. Without controlling who decides to respond or ignore it becomes tough knowing if your sampling is skewed or not.
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
This is the issue. We never really know if [snip] listens to our feedback. An in-game poll would be black and white data. Forums on the other hand are probably the least reliable source of feedback.
If you think ZoS is ignoring the players now then what makes you think any different about an in game poll? We still wouldn't know if the results were given any real consideration.
Again I don't think we are ignored. Sometimes we simply don't like the answers.
Of course [snip] are going to ignore individual written feedback on forums - it would take far too much time to address all these posts. Simple data from a poll would be much better for them
Just as they would ignore one responder to the poll. We know they listen to what is said in the forums and elsewhere because we see their responses. We also see the results. Sometimes we do not like the results. Doesn't mean they didn't consider what we said. They do send out polls so they do have data to look at. They also can look at what players are doing in game to see what is popular and what is not. If you kill a world boss they have that data somewhere they can take a look at.
I am not opposed to in game polls if they are not obtrusive. Maybe something on the character select page we can choose to click on if we want. I just don't see what some think it will accomplish. A new way of telling them we don't want account wide achievements isn't going to stop them from doing account wide achievements if they feel account wide achievements will be good for the game.
The problem with a poll is in determining if a good cross section of players is represented. Without controlling who decides to respond or ignore it becomes tough knowing if your sampling is skewed or not.
What's a better source of data than asking every single player directly "would you rather see a new class or a new guild skill line next patch"?
I feel like people are missing the point of a poll.
[edited to remove quote]
SammyKhajit wrote: »Well, there is the surveys that they email out, but that seems to be sporadic.
There is also the PTS, but feedbacks don’t get much attention.
In-game poll might create a sense of participation, but are they going to use the data at all? That seems to be the key issue here…
I disagree that feedback doesn't get attention. Sometimes we don't like the results of that attention. Not getting the answer we want doesn't mean we were ignored.
This is the issue. We never really know if [snip] listens to our feedback. An in-game poll would be black and white data. Forums on the other hand are probably the least reliable source of feedback.
If you think ZoS is ignoring the players now then what makes you think any different about an in game poll? We still wouldn't know if the results were given any real consideration.
Again I don't think we are ignored. Sometimes we simply don't like the answers.
Of course [snip] are going to ignore individual written feedback on forums - it would take far too much time to address all these posts. Simple data from a poll would be much better for them
Just as they would ignore one responder to the poll. We know they listen to what is said in the forums and elsewhere because we see their responses. We also see the results. Sometimes we do not like the results. Doesn't mean they didn't consider what we said. They do send out polls so they do have data to look at. They also can look at what players are doing in game to see what is popular and what is not. If you kill a world boss they have that data somewhere they can take a look at.
I am not opposed to in game polls if they are not obtrusive. Maybe something on the character select page we can choose to click on if we want. I just don't see what some think it will accomplish. A new way of telling them we don't want account wide achievements isn't going to stop them from doing account wide achievements if they feel account wide achievements will be good for the game.
The problem with a poll is in determining if a good cross section of players is represented. Without controlling who decides to respond or ignore it becomes tough knowing if your sampling is skewed or not.
What's a better source of data than asking every single player directly "would you rather see a new class or a new guild skill line next patch"?
I feel like people are missing the point of a poll.
[edited to remove quote]
We already get that in the way of E-mail polls and our input here in the forums. Again not objecting to the idea but I don't see that it adds anything beyond what we already have. I believe you have expectations that wouldn't be met.
SilverBride wrote: »I feel that a lot of players would just choose any answer to get past the poll and into the game.
When a company calls my phone to answer questions, i tell them to take my number off their list and never call me again.
When a company sends me an e-mail with a "survey", i put them on my spam list.
When someone sends me a letter to answer questions, i throw it in the trash.
When someone on the street stops me to answer questions, i tell them to leave me alone and keep walking.
When someone comes to my house to ask questions, i tell them to go away, i do not open the door and i call the cops if they don't leave.
Should a game ever ask me stupid questions every time i want to play, i will delete it and never buy anything from that company again.
If they really want to know what their customers are thinking, they can wait for feedback. Until then, please stop stalking people and stop wasting other people's time for some manipulated bogus statistics nobody wants.
The forums would be the best way to communicate with customers. Open discussions about all kinds of ideas. But we all know how great that works at the moment...