NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!), despite being described as moral and extremely strict about following the law. Some odd characterisation there.
So no, she's not going to react at all that you're a werewolf.
Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
Yeah, but she says if you do it so she doesn't see (as in not having her active) she's fine with it. Which to me does not fit her supposed honourable and lawful knight characterisation.
Treselegant wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
Yeah, but she says if you do it so she doesn't see (as in not having her active) she's fine with it. Which to me does not fit her supposed honourable and lawful knight characterisation.
It is such bad charactersation. It really screams "we did this because players complained about our last moral character and we don't want anyone to complain about our lovely celebrity voiced companion so er, she's totally fine with you being a murderer...please don't complain... ".
So we ended up with this character who's very morally upright, unwilling to break any rules even when someone she cares for is at risk, but somehow totally fine being besties with a Sithis worshiping murderer. She addresses the player being a vampire as well and somehow I can not see a Knight of Stendarr being 'oh well, just don't feed infront of me'. Like the Brotherhood thing, it's just not really needed, and it's not consistent with the way she otherwise conducts herself.
Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
It never did for me.
Are you thinking of Mirri?
Necrotech_Master wrote: »Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
It never did for me.
Are you thinking of Mirri?
the only companion that does not lose rapport for killing innocents is ember lol
you can blade of woe a hostile NPC, and none of the companions will care about that, its more related to killing like civilians
Necrotech_Master wrote: »Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
It never did for me.
Are you thinking of Mirri?
the only companion that does not lose rapport for killing innocents is ember lol
you can blade of woe a hostile NPC, and none of the companions will care about that, its more related to killing like civilians
Ah, civilians, sure. I was talking about hostiles.
Mirri and Bastian actually do not like the Blade of Woe at all.
Necrotech_Master wrote: »Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
It never did for me.
Are you thinking of Mirri?
the only companion that does not lose rapport for killing innocents is ember lol
you can blade of woe a hostile NPC, and none of the companions will care about that, its more related to killing like civilians
Ah, civilians, sure. I was talking about hostiles.
Mirri and Bastian actually do not like the Blade of Woe at all.
Treselegant wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
Yeah, but she says if you do it so she doesn't see (as in not having her active) she's fine with it. Which to me does not fit her supposed honourable and lawful knight characterisation.
It is such bad charactersation. It really screams "we did this because players complained about our last moral character and we don't want anyone to complain about our lovely celebrity voiced companion so er, she's totally fine with you being a murderer...please don't complain... ".
So we ended up with this character who's very morally upright, unwilling to break any rules even when someone she cares for is at risk, but somehow totally fine being besties with a Sithis worshiping murderer. She addresses the player being a vampire as well and somehow I can not see a Knight of Stendarr being 'oh well, just don't feed infront of me'. Like the Brotherhood thing, it's just not really needed, and it's not consistent with the way she otherwise conducts herself.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Treselegant wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Grizzbeorn wrote: »NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Isobel is fine with you being a member of a infamous murdering death cult (and even says so in actual dialogue!)
But your rapport with her will take a hit if you use the Blade of Woe in her presence.
Yeah, but she says if you do it so she doesn't see (as in not having her active) she's fine with it. Which to me does not fit her supposed honourable and lawful knight characterisation.
It is such bad charactersation. It really screams "we did this because players complained about our last moral character and we don't want anyone to complain about our lovely celebrity voiced companion so er, she's totally fine with you being a murderer...please don't complain... ".
So we ended up with this character who's very morally upright, unwilling to break any rules even when someone she cares for is at risk, but somehow totally fine being besties with a Sithis worshiping murderer. She addresses the player being a vampire as well and somehow I can not see a Knight of Stendarr being 'oh well, just don't feed infront of me'. Like the Brotherhood thing, it's just not really needed, and it's not consistent with the way she otherwise conducts herself.
Yeah. This is why I find her sanctimonious and position obsessed as opposed to moral, like Bastian. They lose rapport on pretty similar things, but Bastian tells you off and tries to convince you not to do those things at all. He's shown as truly bothered by it. Isobel is just like "well don't do it in front me because you're making it difficult for my knighthood." That piece of dialogue makes me feel like she cares about acting the way a knight is supposed to act, rather than caring about the moral implications of things.