Yeah, why shouldn't I be. It's a free dlc, so if I were to stop paying for ESO+ I wouldn't have to lose access to that zone. And this is coming from someone who's been constantly subbed since 2018. If someone has a problem with others getting something then maybe it's time to revaluate their priorities. If it makes ESO+ worthless in your eyes you can always stop paying for it and enjoy your free dlc that way.
Also, it's only fair when they advertise a year long adventure to give said year long adventure with a chapter purchase, not just half of it.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »It devalues the collector's edition which I would of gotten but now it would not be worth the cost, not to mention ESO+ do not benefit from this at all.
Quoted post has been removed.
Sooo... Compare this event to the event that we had several years ago
https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/news/post/62811
now
33%—Oak’s Promise markings
66%—Plant Yourself emote
100%—Ascendant Hoard Box
100%—Appleback Salamander pet (ESO Plus members only)
100%—The Elder Scrolls Online: Firesong DLC!
before
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Online:Summerfall
33% — Psijic Mascot Pony pet
66% — Psijic Escort Charger mount
100% — Grand Psijic Villa player house
ZOS has been dropping the ball on us lately on these events... Sure what they're giving to us it's free... yeah.. I'm grateful.. but at least give us something worthy...blow our minds and get us excited... after all I hire ZOS to entertain me through my ESO+ subscription.
Grand Psijic Villa player house is one of the best and largest homes in the game... it was given to us FOR FREE during the summerset event... now we get a crummy pet when it reaches 100% and instead of a DLC... why not give us a free expansion? you know.. the ones that cost us 45+ dollars?
Yeah, why shouldn't I be. It's a free dlc, so if I were to stop paying for ESO+ I wouldn't have to lose access to that zone. And this is coming from someone who's been constantly subbed since 2018. If someone has a problem with others getting something then maybe it's time to revaluate their priorities. If it makes ESO+ worthless in your eyes you can always stop paying for it and enjoy your free dlc that way.
Also, it's only fair when they advertise a year long adventure to give said year long adventure with a chapter purchase, not just half of it.
boi_anachronism_ wrote: »Yeah, why shouldn't I be. It's a free dlc, so if I were to stop paying for ESO+ I wouldn't have to lose access to that zone. And this is coming from someone who's been constantly subbed since 2018. If someone has a problem with others getting something then maybe it's time to revaluate their priorities. If it makes ESO+ worthless in your eyes you can always stop paying for it and enjoy your free dlc that way.
Also, it's only fair when they advertise a year long adventure to give said year long adventure with a chapter purchase, not just half of it.
No one has an issue with anyone getting the dlc. No one.
EU PC 2000+ CP professional mudballer and pie thrower"Sheggorath, you are the Skooma Cat, for what is crazier than a cat on skooma?" - Fadomai
It seems by the poll this is really divided among those with ESO+ and those without it. I still expect many with ESO+, like myself, could care less about the DLC being offered as a reward as it is not that big of a deal at the end of the day.
after taking the time to notice it costs significantly less to buy the DLCs released in a year vs. subscribe, which means the real value, what we are truly paying for with a subscription, is the crafting bag, storage space, and being able to dye our costumes and armor. That means this is not that big of a deal.
spartaxoxo wrote: »boi_anachronism_ wrote: »Yeah, why shouldn't I be. It's a free dlc, so if I were to stop paying for ESO+ I wouldn't have to lose access to that zone. And this is coming from someone who's been constantly subbed since 2018. If someone has a problem with others getting something then maybe it's time to revaluate their priorities. If it makes ESO+ worthless in your eyes you can always stop paying for it and enjoy your free dlc that way.
Also, it's only fair when they advertise a year long adventure to give said year long adventure with a chapter purchase, not just half of it.
No one has an issue with anyone getting the dlc. No one.
All the complaints about ESO+ being devalued because other people have it, and even requests that they never give it out again on this very thread, I would very much disagree that nobody has an issue with others getting the dlc.
ETA: some feel it's devalued because they won't use their free upgrade, so it's useless to them. Others feel it's devalued because "that's supposed to be a perk of ESO+" and don't ever want to see this that type of reward again.
Clearly for some people part of the value to them of Firesong is that some non-plus players weren't gonna play it.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Clearly for some people part of the value to them of Firesong is that some non-plus players weren't gonna play it.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »It devalues the collector's edition which I would of gotten but now it would not be worth the cost, not to mention ESO+ do not benefit from this at all.
How does this devalue the collector's edition? It wasn't part of it, would never be part of it?
boi_anachronism_ wrote: »Incorrect.
<Snipped for brevity>
If everyone had gotten a pet I'd still not like it but at least everyone would have gotten something of equal value. ESO+ players had one of the perks they pay a monthly subscription for just given to those who don't for free, which completely invalidates it as a perk
<Snipped for brevity>
I'd suggest they discount our subscriptions or give subscribers some crowns or something of worth to make up for the difference, but that is only a bandaid solution. The real solution is to not give ESO+ perks away in the first place.
I'm no longer seeing the value in my subscription when Non Sub players get treated better by ZoS and subs get the bare minimum.
Please consider a temporary discount or extra crowns with our subs to make the value of the rewards more even. But more importantly please don't give away any more of our paid perks in the future because it takes away from the value of our subscriptions.
SilverBride wrote: »It seems by the poll this is really divided among those with ESO+ and those without it. I still expect many with ESO+, like myself, could care less about the DLC being offered as a reward as it is not that big of a deal at the end of the day.
after taking the time to notice it costs significantly less to buy the DLCs released in a year vs. subscribe, which means the real value, what we are truly paying for with a subscription, is the crafting bag, storage space, and being able to dye our costumes and armor. That means this is not that big of a deal.
And what if next year they give a crafting bag to everyone?
SilverBride wrote: »It seems by the poll this is really divided among those with ESO+ and those without it. I still expect many with ESO+, like myself, could care less about the DLC being offered as a reward as it is not that big of a deal at the end of the day.
after taking the time to notice it costs significantly less to buy the DLCs released in a year vs. subscribe, which means the real value, what we are truly paying for with a subscription, is the crafting bag, storage space, and being able to dye our costumes and armor. That means this is not that big of a deal.
And what if next year they give a crafting bag to everyone?
The crafting bag is the biggest draw for ESO+ and ESO+ if a much larger revenue source than selling DLCs. In other words, the hypothetical that they would just give everyone the crafting bag is a very unrealistic hypothetical.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Which makes ESO+ a savings of around 25 dollars if you pay per month. If you pay for the whole year upfront that savings increases to 64.97. So essentially those who buy the whole year at once are only paying for the crowns, and getting the other stuff as a free bonus rewards.
SilverBride wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »Which makes ESO+ a savings of around 25 dollars if you pay per month. If you pay for the whole year upfront that savings increases to 64.97. So essentially those who buy the whole year at once are only paying for the crowns, and getting the other stuff as a free bonus rewards.
ESO+ members pay for the complete package of perks. Nothing is a free bonus reward.
Even if the perks were sold separately, which they aren't, we need to factor in that ESO+ subscribers are only renting the DLC access for the time they are subscribed. That would not cost as much as buying and permanently owning them like the free ones they have given away for 2 years in a row now.
Plus the fact that ESO+ members continue to pay for DLC access even for the ones they were given. Why do we have to continue to pay to rent something we now own?
spartaxoxo wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »Which makes ESO+ a savings of around 25 dollars if you pay per month. If you pay for the whole year upfront that savings increases to 64.97. So essentially those who buy the whole year at once are only paying for the crowns, and getting the other stuff as a free bonus rewards.
ESO+ members pay for the complete package of perks. Nothing is a free bonus reward.
Even if the perks were sold separately, which they aren't, we need to factor in that ESO+ subscribers are only renting the DLC access for the time they are subscribed. That would not cost as much as buying and permanently owning them like the free ones they have given away for 2 years in a row now.
Plus the fact that ESO+ members continue to pay for DLC access even for the ones they were given. Why do we have to continue to pay to rent something we now own?
The crowns and the DLC ARE sold separately...