(You're slightly off on the timing as well. The game switched to buy-to-play and introduced the crown store in March 2015, the One Tamriel update wasn't until October 2016.)
EdmondDontes wrote: »EdmondDontes wrote: »This is the standard ZOS marketing tactic. Everything decent, even storage, is behind a paywall.
It's what happens when people don't want to pay subscriptions. They want everything for free, and then complain as soon as an alternative revenue source is implemented which it has to be because game development and maintenance is no different to anything else in life, it costs money on which a return has to be earned. At least there's no inherent game-winning advantage in anything that is locked behind a paywall in ESO, ZOS have done a good job thus far in not falling into the Pay To Win trap.
It's a pay to play marketing strategy in disguise. And, given the way they've continuously put new OP gear in new chapters/expansions, a strong argument can be made that there is a pay to win strategy in effect as well; case and point, Oakensoul.
spartaxoxo wrote: »psychotrip wrote: »EdmondDontes wrote: »This is the standard ZOS marketing tactic. Everything decent, even storage, is behind a paywall.
It's what happens when people don't want to pay subscriptions. They want everything for free, and then complain as soon as an alternative revenue source is implemented which it has to be because game development and maintenance is no different to anything else in life, it costs money on which a return has to be earned. At least there's no inherent game-winning advantage in anything that is locked behind a paywall in ESO, ZOS have done a good job thus far in not falling into the Pay To Win trap.
Bro I paid a WoW subscription since middle school, and only quit when the game went downhill. This isnt about kids these days wanting everything for free. People will pay a sub if the game is good enough.
The reason live services move to the MTX model is simple: profit. They can make far more by [SNIP] a "free to play" or "buy to play" [SNIP] than by catering to a slightly smaller audience that gives them consistent revenue.
Stop blaming your fellow gamers for the current state of AAA gaming. We weren't the ones asking for this.
To add on that, even those who DID ask for it generally don't want everything for free. People are generally fine with paying for substantial expansions and cosmetics. What they tend to not like in being cash store exclusive is classes/characters and power. And even in the case of classes/characters most don't mind those being in the cash shop for faster as long as there is a way to grind them out.
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »Not defending imperial being paywalled but it is a very strong race for tanking. It's either the best or slightly behind redguard depending on the fight for as the BIS race for tanking. It's far from teh useless option that people like to make it out to be.
barney2525 wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »psychotrip wrote: »EdmondDontes wrote: »This is the standard ZOS marketing tactic. Everything decent, even storage, is behind a paywall.
It's what happens when people don't want to pay subscriptions. They want everything for free, and then complain as soon as an alternative revenue source is implemented which it has to be because game development and maintenance is no different to anything else in life, it costs money on which a return has to be earned. At least there's no inherent game-winning advantage in anything that is locked behind a paywall in ESO, ZOS have done a good job thus far in not falling into the Pay To Win trap.
Bro I paid a WoW subscription since middle school, and only quit when the game went downhill. This isnt about kids these days wanting everything for free. People will pay a sub if the game is good enough.
The reason live services move to the MTX model is simple: profit. They can make far more by [SNIP] a "free to play" or "buy to play" [SNIP] than by catering to a slightly smaller audience that gives them consistent revenue.
Stop blaming your fellow gamers for the current state of AAA gaming. We weren't the ones asking for this.
To add on that, even those who DID ask for it generally don't want everything for free. People are generally fine with paying for substantial expansions and cosmetics. What they tend to not like in being cash store exclusive is classes/characters and power. And even in the case of classes/characters most don't mind those being in the cash shop for faster as long as there is a way to grind them out.
Good point.
Probably why Imperial is Not (and will never be) BIS Race for stamina classes. That would be a sign of P2W.
So we get to Pay ... for a Race that will Never be the preferred Race ... for Any particular class.
Yeah. That's good thinking.
EdmondDontes wrote: »This is the standard ZOS marketing tactic. Everything decent, even storage, is behind a paywall.
It's what happens when people don't want to pay subscriptions. They want everything for free, and then complain as soon as an alternative revenue source is implemented which it has to be because game development and maintenance is no different to anything else in life, it costs money on which a return has to be earned. At least there's no inherent game-winning advantage in anything that is locked behind a paywall in ESO, ZOS have done a good job thus far in not falling into the Pay To Win trap.
EdmondDontes wrote: »This is the standard ZOS marketing tactic. Everything decent, even storage, is behind a paywall.
It's what happens when people don't want to pay subscriptions. They want everything for free, and then complain as soon as an alternative revenue source is implemented which it has to be because game development and maintenance is no different to anything else in life, it costs money on which a return has to be earned. At least there's no inherent game-winning advantage in anything that is locked behind a paywall in ESO, ZOS have done a good job thus far in not falling into the Pay To Win trap.
Well, I pay ESO + for years and never got Imperials for free, for instance. Still have to pay for it.
EdmondDontes wrote: »But you've got plenty of Crowns as part of the ESO+ package which you could use to pay for it.
Yeah, I understand it made a lot more sense back in 2015 when it was launched but now? I have so many nice mounts and pets that it's literally only the race I'd pay for - and 20 euros is a really high asking price for that lol.
barney2525 wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »psychotrip wrote: »EdmondDontes wrote: »This is the standard ZOS marketing tactic. Everything decent, even storage, is behind a paywall.
It's what happens when people don't want to pay subscriptions. They want everything for free, and then complain as soon as an alternative revenue source is implemented which it has to be because game development and maintenance is no different to anything else in life, it costs money on which a return has to be earned. At least there's no inherent game-winning advantage in anything that is locked behind a paywall in ESO, ZOS have done a good job thus far in not falling into the Pay To Win trap.
Bro I paid a WoW subscription since middle school, and only quit when the game went downhill. This isnt about kids these days wanting everything for free. People will pay a sub if the game is good enough.
The reason live services move to the MTX model is simple: profit. They can make far more by [SNIP] a "free to play" or "buy to play" [SNIP] than by catering to a slightly smaller audience that gives them consistent revenue.
Stop blaming your fellow gamers for the current state of AAA gaming. We weren't the ones asking for this.
To add on that, even those who DID ask for it generally don't want everything for free. People are generally fine with paying for substantial expansions and cosmetics. What they tend to not like in being cash store exclusive is classes/characters and power. And even in the case of classes/characters most don't mind those being in the cash shop for faster as long as there is a way to grind them out.
Good point.
Probably why Imperial is Not (and will never be) BIS Race for stamina classes. That would be a sign of P2W.
So we get to Pay ... for a Race that will Never be the preferred Race ... for Any particular class.
Yeah. That's good thinking.
barney2525 wrote: »They nerfed the Imperial a Looooong time ago, got rid of its passive Heal.
Now its not even a first choice for ANY class. Imperial outfits are not particularly noteworthy, so just adding the motif to the large number of items you never wear isn't worth much.
Doesn't even have a very good range of hair colors IMHO
It doesn't seem worthy of paying $20 to add the race. As a matter of fact, when I started the new account from scratch I did not buy the Imperial package because I could not see any reason to use it. Other races perform better. And as of this writing, I still have not bought it for this account.
No, imperials are definitely a race. A race which is also found outside Cyrodiil.Honestly, I think the game is somewhat schizophrenic with imperials.
For one thing they are not really a race - are they? I would assume that being an 'Imperial; just indicates that you are a resident of Cyrodill, no?
No one knows because there is no Emperor atm and Cyrodiil is in shambles with Imperial City being full of daedra.And no one knows who the emperor is because they are all fighting over it - apart that is for the actual Imperials and the Tharn family who happily stomp around in Elsweyr (and elsewhere) generally being horrible to all the alliances