What I don't get is why they close old threads to encourage new ones. While yes the game is always changing and so new information needs to be considered, if a thread has been around for that long and people are STILL addressing it, I think knowing just how long it's been around says something to the content and thus should not be closed and forgotten.
What I don't get is why they close old threads to encourage new ones. While yes the game is always changing and so new information needs to be considered, if a thread has been around for that long and people are STILL addressing it, I think knowing just how long it's been around says something to the content and thus should not be closed and forgotten.
One thread was closed because it was totally non-constructive and didn't actually make any point in support of its title, and the other was closed because it was a duplicate of the first one. This thread will doubtless follow the same way because it doesn't make any constructive point either and simply challenges the previous moderations, which is of course against forum rules.
ZOS_Hadeostry wrote: »Greetings,
After further review we have decided to move this thread to a category we think is more appropriate for this topic.
Thank you for your understanding.
NeuroticPixels wrote: »What I don't get is why they close old threads to encourage new ones. While yes the game is always changing and so new information needs to be considered, if a thread has been around for that long and people are STILL addressing it, I think knowing just how long it's been around says something to the content and thus should not be closed and forgotten.
Agreed. If the post is getting relevant comments, it shouldn’t be closed just because the original post is old and/or it hasn’t been commented on in a long time. “Necroing” posts shouldn’t be a bad thing, especially if it’s related to bugs or gameplay.