Maintenance for the week of December 15:
· [IN PROGRESS] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [IN PROGRESS] Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [IN PROGRESS] PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [IN PROGRESS] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [IN PROGRESS] Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [IN PROGRESS] PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
Wrathful Strikes vs Biting Aura
ACamaroGuy
✭✭✭
I play a PvE MagPlar High Elf. Why would I use Wrathful Strikes over Biting Aura? My jabs are an AoE. My class abilities are Magicka not spell damage. So why would I need/want higher spell damage?
Edited by ZOS_Bill on January 20, 2022 12:49AM For the Empire
0
-
haelgaan✭✭✭✭✭Spell damage increases your magicka damage. That said, I would go with Biting Aura over Wrathful Strikes on a magplar... I only slot Wrathful as an alternative to Backstabber, when the dungeon or trial doesn't support flanking/back positioning.2 -
virtus753✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Spell damage increases your magicka damage. That said, I would go with Biting Aura over Wrathful Strikes on a magplar... I only slot Wrathful as an alternative to Backstabber, when the dungeon or trial doesn't support flanking/back positioning.
Or when you’re exceeding crit dam cap, which comes sooner on a templar due to class passives.3