You're paying for a time. ESO+ free trial simply takes away 2 weeks of your paid time, half of what you've paid.
Actually, you pay for 30 days of ESO Plus and you get 30 days of ESO Plus. Quod erat demonstrandum.
I am not sure where we get to "You paid for 30 days, but you get 35 because people who did not pay got 5 days". To me this is a non sequitur. I paid for 30 days because I wanted 30 days. That was the value of my money and that is what I received. The 30 days has not changed. The amount I paid has not changed. What am I missing?
You were paying for 30 days for a service you would not have gotten otherwise.
Now are paying for 23 days for a service you would not have gotten otherwise, for the same price as 30 days.
That is the pain point here.
It seems to me that giving existing Plus members some desirable extra as a bonus very publicly during these free weeks might have the effect of encouraging more non-subscribers to join so they could also receive these items. It would also have the effect of reinforcing to the subscriber how wise having their subscription is and how special they are for being part of the club.
Kiralyn2000 wrote: »
4 free weeks of ESO+ is around 12$ off your yearly sub. I would say its a valid gripe.
I don't see why ZOS can't give some crown items in the 400-500c range for people who are subbed during a free ESO+ week. It'd be a nice gesture
4 free weeks of ESO+ is around 12$ off your yearly sub. I would say its a valid gripe.
I don't see why ZOS can't give some crown items in the 400-500c range for people who are subbed during a free ESO+ week. It'd be a nice gesture
I find it amusing that some are mentioning the trial as an absolute loss ($12) to them. It's not, it is perceiving someone else's gain as their loss. A perceived loss, not an actual loss.
This 1 to 1 gain and loss comparison under the guise of fairness is disturbing. If that is the case, wouldn't it be more fair to suggest for ZOS to tally up the number of players who've activated the free trial, and then reward the exact same number of ESO+ players with a bonus? That is a direct 1 to 1 gain and completely fair, no?
In fairness, the number of ESO+ subscribers rewarded will depend on how successful the free trial was, and that we can't measure since we do not really know the figures. But then how would you decide which ESO+ subscribers receive rewards and who don't such that it would be fair?
ZOS will probably reap the benefits of only a fraction of players on the free trial converting to ESO+, but existing ESO+ subscribers are demanding a payout for every single one of them. That seems fair? That just sounds greedy, calculating and petty.
As a subscriber on 2 accounts continuously for seven and a half years, I don't have any problem with these trials, and I don't feel entitled to something in lieu as a subscriber.
However, I do suspect that they are counter-productive. I assume their purpose is to recruit more subscribers because that's to the company's advantage, but they are now held so often that committed non-subscribers use them for effective inventory management. They don't need to subscribe for the crafting bag because they can use the free trial to optimise their use of the crafting bag anyway.
Because these trials are announced out of the blue, people with running overlapping subs feel short changed.
It's an objective loss if you don't care for the crowns. If you got a 1 month sub from Oct-Nov you paid for 4 weeks when you could've paid for 3. Or if known prior they could start their one month sub on the last week of September.
If you're paying for a yearly subscription, you're paying for 12 months when you could've got by with paying for 11.
So that's 8% less value for what you paid 150$ for.
wtlonewolf20 wrote: »I am subbed on multiple accounts, and honestly? no they shouldn't and wont do this.
Here is my reasoning,
- ZOS has been offering free ESO+ trials for years now, and these come out once a quarter usually, but are also not guaranteed. When you sub, regardless of the time frame, you are waiving any benefits to anything that ZOS may offer free in the future, in exchange for benefits now or over a longer period.
- you still recieved the crowns included in Plus that free trial users dont get access to, these are provided at very close to sale conversion rates. this alone should offset any "lost" time
- ESO + trials are designed to entice players to subscribe to ESO+
- Plus free trials are a benefit to the community as a whole, and is not a purchase gated item. if you own any version of ESO you can benefit from it, with the exception of those that pay for it.
- having ESO Plus allows you the option to access the benefits until a specified renewal date. Access to the game during that time is NOT guaranteed by ZOS. They will maintain the servers as best they can, but if servers go down, or if you violate the TOS they are not obligated to compensate you for lost playtime.
4 free weeks of ESO+ is around 12$ off your yearly sub. I would say its a valid gripe.
I don't see why ZOS can't give some crown items in the 400-500c range for people who are subbed during a free ESO+ week. It'd be a nice gesture
I find it amusing that some are mentioning the trial as an absolute loss ($12) to them. It's not, it is perceiving someone else's gain as their loss. A perceived loss, not an actual loss.
This 1 to 1 gain and loss comparison under the guise of fairness is disturbing. If that is the case, wouldn't it be more fair to suggest for ZOS to tally up the number of players who've activated the free trial, and then reward the exact same number of ESO+ players with a bonus? That is a direct 1 to 1 gain and completely fair, no?
In fairness, the number of ESO+ subscribers rewarded will depend on how successful the free trial was, and that we can't measure since we do not really know the figures. But then how would you decide which ESO+ subscribers receive rewards and who don't such that it would be fair?
ZOS will probably reap the benefits of only a fraction of players on the free trial converting to ESO+, but existing ESO+ subscribers are demanding a payout for every single one of them. That seems fair? That just sounds greedy, calculating and petty.
Because these trials are announced out of the blue, people with running overlapping subs feel short changed.
It's an objective loss if you don't care for the crowns. If you got a 1 month sub from Oct-Nov you paid for 4 weeks when you could've paid for 3. Or if known prior they could start their one month sub on the last week of September.
If you're paying for a yearly subscription, you're paying for 12 months when you could've got by with paying for 11.
So that's 8% less value for what you paid 150$ for.
I find it amusing that some are mentioning the trial as an absolute loss ($12) to them. It's not, it is perceiving someone else's gain as their loss. A perceived loss, not an actual loss.
I find it amusing that some are mentioning the trial as an absolute loss ($12) to them. It's not, it is perceiving someone else's gain as their loss. A perceived loss, not an actual loss.
From a mathematical point of view : absolutely speaking it is indeed not a loss, relatively speaking it IS a loss.
That you find it to be amusing, it is because you do not (or better : do not want) to understand.
Paying for what others get for free, can never be justified.
(Edited because of typo.)
I find it amusing that some are mentioning the trial as an absolute loss ($12) to them. It's not, it is perceiving someone else's gain as their loss. A perceived loss, not an actual loss.
From a mathematical point of view : absolutely speaking it is indeed not a loss, relatively speaking it IS a loss.
That you find it to be amusing, it is because you do not (or better : do not want) to understand.
Paying for what others get for free, can never be justified.
(Edited because of typo.)
ElderZeref wrote: »
But, speaking seriously. It seems to me that this is simply unfair. And the best solution would be to never give free ECO + again. This will eliminate all problems and disputes. Whoever needs it will buy it.
As I already noted before, I like how BDO managed it. They simply gives you free 7 days of sub which you can activate any time you want and this 7days will add to your existing Sub time, this is done just right and clean, everyone happy.
It is common for games to offer a free trial but I cannot recall any giving subscribers free time as a result.
Also, @Kiralyn2000 brings up a good point, there are some players that have purchased all the DLCs and do not subscribe. They really have no interest and very little benefit from the free trial so what does Zenimax give them?
In the end, we all benefit from the free trial since it is designed to get more players subscribing which is good for the game.
wtlonewolf20 wrote: »I am subbed on multiple accounts, and honestly? no they shouldn't and wont do this.
Here is my reasoning,
- ZOS has been offering free ESO+ trials for years now, and these come out once a quarter usually, but are also not guaranteed. When you sub, regardless of the time frame, you are waiving any benefits to anything that ZOS may offer free in the future, in exchange for benefits now or over a longer period.
- you still recieved the crowns included in Plus that free trial users dont get access to, these are provided at very close to sale conversion rates. this alone should offset any "lost" time
- ESO + trials are designed to entice players to subscribe to ESO+
- Plus free trials are a benefit to the community as a whole, and is not a purchase gated item. if you own any version of ESO you can benefit from it, with the exception of those that pay for it.
- having ESO Plus allows you the option to access the benefits until a specified renewal date. Access to the game during that time is NOT guaranteed by ZOS. They will maintain the servers as best they can, but if servers go down, or if you violate the TOS they are not obligated to compensate you for lost playtime.
Most of ppl here who speaks against +7 days to sub time are ppl who can afford to pay for ESO+ each month and looks like you guys are not thinking about other ppl who can't afford it, who counts each day of their sub and to defend your point of view you keep grasping for such obvious things like 'Crowns', Discounts...personaly, I benefited from discounts just once, and don't really care about crowns I saved, it's almost nothing, and to really benefit from such discounts you should always buy and buy some discounted stuff with crowns..yes, we also get free tiny statuets...tbh I don't care about them, as well, as majority of players, well, as far as I know.
Sure, extra Crowns are a good bonus,I appreciate it, but it is a bonus, it's not the reason why I'm paying for sub, not to mention, that I can even farm gold to buy some crowns, so yeah, I don't value them so much, what I value is limited access to DLCs\Craftbag\Costume Dyeing\Housing which you can't get for crowns, so I'm paying for a time and time is money, you paid 30 Septims for each day of your Sub and now, without any profit, without any signs of gratitude you got -210 Septims you paid for 7 days, but yeah...you got some discounts which most ppl will not really benefit from, free tiny statuete which you can..well, lol...and lastly crowns which can't extend your access to DLCs\Craftbag\Costume Dyeing\Housing.
As I already noted before, I like how BDO managed it. They simply gives you free 7 days of sub which you can activate any time you want and this 7days will add to your existing Sub time, this is done just right and clean, everyone happy.