As a ps4 player this makes me nervous but such is life. Don't see them stopping supporting it on PS but I can see changes being made in the long run.
Hope the dev's here get a nice bonus from this.
Sylvermynx wrote: »The one thing that will kill this for me is crossplay when it happens. There's already too many people around for me.... I'll just go back to original Skyrim forever.
Sylvermynx wrote: »Hoo boy. Too bad it's not April.... Can you provide a link to that please?
Add on's coming to an Xbox near you but not for PS users:)
gatekeeper13 wrote: »Not sure if this good or bad news...
I am inclined to agree with this. Sure, they are a very wealthy company but at the same time it seems like they have too many IP's and not enough work done on them to sustain investments, etc to provide adequate returns. I have said and had a hunch about this stuff many times in the past. I have also felt it would be a wise choice would be that another company needs to buy out these IP's because, well...just look at the history. It truly speaks for itself, and here we are. One thing is for sure, money WONT be the issue in question this time, at least on the account of availability and investment. The question is, will things change and if so, for the better and moreso for the most important aspect...the PLAYER?Mahabahabtha wrote: »methinks, after Years of no News for their upcoming Games like Starfield and ES6, they were broke
KappaKid83 wrote: »Am I the only one who doesn't want it to be supported EXACTLY how it was and would like it to be better with better servers, better communication and a better overall experience than the crappy one that has been prevalent for the last 3+ years????
Can someone help me understand the difference between ZOS and Bethasda? Microsoft bought ZOS. Does that mean Bethesda is still it's own thing? What does that mean for Elder Scrolls (Not Online)?
Can someone help me understand the difference between ZOS and Bethasda? Microsoft bought ZOS. Does that mean Bethesda is still it's own thing? What does that mean for Elder Scrolls (Not Online)?
BalticBlues wrote: »BalticBlues wrote: »Bethesda, could be you think about selling to Apple instead of Microsoft pls?
I am certain Apple would be thrilled of a purchase if you would offer one.Don't you remember? Microsoft even RUINED their Windows mobile platform and Nokia with it due to their poor mobile software. At that time, it was Apple's iOS which REVOLUTIONIZED mobile platforms and mobile gaming as we know it today. Today, almost all mobile companies copy software concepts Apple invented (as Microsoft before copied Apple's desktop/mouse UI concepts). The computers and mobiles we use today are build on hardware and software concepts of Apple. Apple means innovations. M$ means just dollars.SeanBlader wrote: »Let's just be clear Apple isn't a software company, they are a hardware company that happens to make some mediocre software on the side.
Luke_Flamesword wrote: »It can be good, it can be bad, but personally I think that we have better chances for good option. Why? main reason is that previous owner had very predatory policy and I think it's one of reasons why ESO has problems. They don't want to invest too much, they wanted to milking game. I think that ZOS is really good team, but they just don't have enough resources (cash and employees) to make ESO great againSo in worst scenario it will just the same situation and nothing changes (they won't butcher one of most most popular MMOs after paying 7,5 billion) and in good scenario - Microsoft will see potential of game and will invest more cash to make game better and build even bigger playerbase.
Also Microsoft bought Minecraft and as we can see - game is more popular and better developed than ever.
Just stay positive, what other we can do