Red_Feather wrote: »I really really like it and wanted to see more and maybe find a desktop background from their pictures.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »The style is lovely, and it's very well done. But I also strongly dislike that the mer looks so human, which seems to be a common issue in the art and cinematics.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »The style is lovely, and it's very well done. But I also strongly dislike that the mer looks so human, which seems to be a common issue in the art and cinematics.
Yes, I was reminded of the illustrations in typical pen & paper rpg rule books. Subjectively, for me, it does not really feel like TES. Still, I like the style and think they're very well made from the artistic point of view. It could be much worse.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Aye. Still bothers me though. I mean, they get the aesthetics of the other races right, so why not the mer. In the earlier stages of the art piece's progress bjambjam just linked it was a khajiit, which looked correct. But they can't even get the mer their eyes.
ARE those supposed to be Iachesis and Valsirenn though? I thought they usually choose generic 'representatives' for their races and characters, not direct equivalents. For example I don't think any of the keyart characters are supposed to be a named ingame NPC. (Apart from obvious ones like Abnur and Khamira).NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Aye. Still bothers me though. I mean, they get the aesthetics of the other races right, so why not the mer. In the earlier stages of the art piece's progress bjambjam just linked it was a khajiit, which looked correct. But they can't even get the mer their eyes.
I think I've just gotten used to it. I can still remember the irritation though, when I first noticed it. I think it was this picture, when housing was introduced. Although the Bosmer lady here looks even weirder.
It's also strange when you directly compare the persons portrayed with how they look in game. Of course there can be small differences, I know, but if it doesn't really match at all...
Valsirenn: https://cdnb.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/011/151/805/large/lucas-slominski-keyart-u18-detail-a.jpg
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/File:ON-npc-Valsirenn_02.jpg
Iachesis: https://cdna.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/011/151/812/large/lucas-slominski-keyart-u18-detail-c.jpg
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/File:ON-npc-Ritemaster_Iachesis.jpg
The art is great in itself, technically, aesthetically. But I also liked it better if it were a bit closer to the original looks.
ARE those supposed to be Iachesis and Valsirenn though?
Hm, strange then. One of those is clearly not Canon then - since we meet them ingame I'm assuming the art isn't canonically Valsirenn and Iachesis (though they might be in the artists' vision), since it's supposed to be in the Summerset present timeline and they clearly look different (so it's not even possible that it's a past image of them that might have continuity with their present appearance)."Syldras;c-6878966"]Yes. It's stated here:ARE those supposed to be Iachesis and Valsirenn though?
https://www.artstation.com/artwork/vevva
"Detail: Valsirenn pleads for the Vestige to intercede in Summerset."
"Detail: Ritemaster Iachesis shares a disturbing premonition."
I think I've just gotten used to it. I can still remember the irritation though, when I first noticed it.
*snip*
The art is great in itself, technically, aesthetically. But I also liked it better if it were a bit closer to the original looks.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »I remember seeing art done for Elder Scrolls Legends, which is also a bit iffy at some points, but all the mer I saw was mer looking.
YstradClud wrote: »It's quite nice but what are they all looking at? Some Daedra trying to destroy Summerset?
YstradClud wrote: »It's quite nice but what are they all looking at? Some Daedra trying to destroy Summerset?
You haven't played the main quest yet, I guess?
YstradClud wrote: »It's quite nice but what are they all looking at? Some Daedra trying to destroy Summerset?
YstradClud wrote: »It's quite nice but what are they all looking at? Some Daedra trying to destroy Summerset?
That's Mephala, which I find strange, as she's not the "main" antagonist of Summerset storyline. I guess the artist didn't wanna spoil the twist in the story.
Yes, that is what I wrote too. That the artist's vision can't be Canon anyway, because the way he represents Mer eyes in particular clashes with TES Lore and established aesthethics. So in that way, his take on named characters doesn't matter, because his pictures are more 'inspired by' Elder Scrolls and can't be official Elder Scrolls canon depictions. Still, that doesn't stop us from enjoying the images - they are nice and a clearly beautifully crafted homage!NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »@bluebird Even if they weren't to represent those specific characters, they still don't look like mer.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Looks like Namira. Going by her statue
That's Mephala, which I find strange, as she's not the "main" antagonist of Summerset storyline.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Looks like Namira. Going by her statue
The text here says it's Mephala:
https://www.artstation.com/artwork/vevva
I mean, the hands don't exactly match and you don't see much of her body, but as she is called the Webspinner and mostly depicted with a spider-like appearance, it's still okay I guess.
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/File:ON-npc-Mephala_03.jpgThat's Mephala, which I find strange, as she's not the "main" antagonist of Summerset storyline.
She is part of the Daedric Triad who is behind all of this.
https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Online:The_Triad
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »I know it makes sense to be Mephala, with her being part of the story and the spidery legs. But it looks an awful lot like the Namira statue. Like ridiculously so.