Spartycuss wrote: »i'll be honest, there is no way its that big of expansion at 5gb.. no way no how, i'm disappointed.
You forget that part of the performance improvements included a more efficient patching process with much smaller downloads than we have seen previously. So believe it
Spartycuss wrote: »Spartycuss wrote: »i'll be honest, there is no way its that big of expansion at 5gb.. no way no how, i'm disappointed.
You forget that part of the performance improvements included a more efficient patching process with much smaller downloads than we have seen previously. So believe it
its not 5 gb dude the guy misread it, 57000MB = 57 GB.
asuitandtyb14_ESO wrote: »Cool, have fun I guess. I have no idea when my physical collector's edition is arriving, so I'm out in the wind with my *** in my hands.
Spartycuss wrote: »Spartycuss wrote: »i'll be honest, there is no way its that big of expansion at 5gb.. no way no how, i'm disappointed.
You forget that part of the performance improvements included a more efficient patching process with much smaller downloads than we have seen previously. So believe it
its not 5 gb dude the guy misread it, 57000MB = 57 GB.
Well dude I guarantee I didn't have a 57GB download, more like 5 to 7 GB. It may have patched 57GB worth of data, but it certainly didn't download that much.
Spartycuss wrote: »Spartycuss wrote: »Spartycuss wrote: »i'll be honest, there is no way its that big of expansion at 5gb.. no way no how, i'm disappointed.
You forget that part of the performance improvements included a more efficient patching process with much smaller downloads than we have seen previously. So believe it
its not 5 gb dude the guy misread it, 57000MB = 57 GB.
Well dude I guarantee I didn't have a 57GB download, more like 5 to 7 GB. It may have patched 57GB worth of data, but it certainly didn't download that much.
I have TB internet so I didn't notice but yeah you are probably right dude. my bad.. why so small? or just really good compression now?
Spartycuss wrote: »Spartycuss wrote: »Spartycuss wrote: »i'll be honest, there is no way its that big of expansion at 5gb.. no way no how, i'm disappointed.
You forget that part of the performance improvements included a more efficient patching process with much smaller downloads than we have seen previously. So believe it
its not 5 gb dude the guy misread it, 57000MB = 57 GB.
Well dude I guarantee I didn't have a 57GB download, more like 5 to 7 GB. It may have patched 57GB worth of data, but it certainly didn't download that much.
I have TB internet so I didn't notice but yeah you are probably right dude. my bad.. why so small? or just really good compression now?
Meh, just use the down time to try out that weird thing mortals do at night. What's it called? Sweeping in a bed? Seems like an odd thing to do in the middle of the night, but mortals are strange creatures.
Spartycuss wrote: »60GB is beefy boys! we in for a treat