StormeReigns wrote: »Normally, when one asks for names to be released, often they are seeking very common, cliche and specific name theme. Don't even have to follow traditional spelling to achieve the articulation, annunciation and pronunciation one wishes, simple word play can go a very long way
Examples of common fantasy / cliche names I've seen come and go in ESO with unique word play since 2015:
Ash Falls = Ashe Fawls
Dark Rain = Darque Rayen (Reign)
Damien Dark = Dameon Darque
Violence = Viola Lance
Decay = D. Kaye / Dee Kay
Torrent = Tor Ennt
Graverobber/digger = Phyllis (Phillip) Graves / Douglas Graves / Robin Graves
It is all luck of the draw really. Just cause there is a name you want doesn't mean that it isn't being actively used. You might be active during one time set, and the one who has the name you really want might be active during another and rarely if ever cross each other's path, cause, one player's bed time is another player's prime time.
Almost every post ignores what the original post says and just comments. [snip]
So I will bucket the different responses and respond to them that way.
-First Bucket, "I quit the game for a year and just came back, NO THANKS!"
Response: Yea so thats exactly the customer-base I said wouldn't be affected by this name release. Right at the top, a conversation starter of 3+ years of inactivity. I've taken breaks of 1 year too, alot of people have. This game honestly drains you with how many issues it has. I'm clearly talking about accounts that are long inactive, not your typical hiatus lengths.
-Second Bucket, "I played beta and just came back!!!!!!"
response: You prove the exception but in a thread that has at best 20 different posters? Yea not the norm. Those people who are the norm have quit. they arent coming back. Also, how come all the people who say they beta'd the game and just came back have forum accounts that are mere months old? At worst you're lieing and at best you did not provide feedback during the beta. ps. Check my account age (im gonna love the hate I get for that comment)
-Third Bucket, "NO way because its unfair I never even got an email from ESO when it went f2p or SWTOR/WOW when they changed naming policies"
Response: At a certain point the customer has a responsibility. If you make fake emails and don't have anyway to be contacted. That just to me proves more why customers who do have interest in playing the game should have your inactive names of 3,4,5, years freed up.
Summary: I didn't flesh out the entire idea for ZOS because they dont pay me to do these things. There's a certain expectation that they would properly inform customers of these intentions. Make it so that its an appropriate amount of inactivity with certain caveats (time spent in game, money spent etc) and generally attempt to weed out those who actually play ESO and those who dumped it.
To those that feel like they're proving the exception. "I really did play beta and JUST came back." I'm sorry, get over it. Guess what, you're back! Your names arent going anywhere.
Almost every post ignores what the original post says and just comments. [snip]
So I will bucket the different responses and respond to them that way.
-First Bucket, "I quit the game for a year and just came back, NO THANKS!"
Response: Yea so thats exactly the customer-base I said wouldn't be affected by this name release. Right at the top, a conversation starter of 3+ years of inactivity. I've taken breaks of 1 year too, alot of people have. This game honestly drains you with how many issues it has. I'm clearly talking about accounts that are long inactive, not your typical hiatus lengths.
-Second Bucket, "I played beta and just came back!!!!!!"
response: You prove the exception but in a thread that has at best 20 different posters? Yea not the norm. Those people who are the norm have quit. they arent coming back. Also, how come all the people who say they beta'd the game and just came back have forum accounts that are mere months old? At worst you're lieing and at best you did not provide feedback during the beta. ps. Check my account age (im gonna love the hate I get for that comment)
-Third Bucket, "NO way because its unfair I never even got an email from ESO when it went f2p or SWTOR/WOW when they changed naming policies"
Response: At a certain point the customer has a responsibility. If you make fake emails and don't have anyway to be contacted. That just to me proves more why customers who do have interest in playing the game should have your inactive names of 3,4,5, years freed up.
Summary: I didn't flesh out the entire idea for ZOS because they dont pay me to do these things. There's a certain expectation that they would properly inform customers of these intentions. Make it so that its an appropriate amount of inactivity with certain caveats (time spent in game, money spent etc) and generally attempt to weed out those who actually play ESO and those who dumped it.
To those that feel like they're proving the exception. "I really did play beta and JUST came back." I'm sorry, get over it. Guess what, you're back! Your names arent going anywhere.
Almost every post ignores what the original post says and just comments. [snip]
So I will bucket the different responses and respond to them that way.
-First Bucket, "I quit the game for a year and just came back, NO THANKS!"
Response: Yea so thats exactly the customer-base I said wouldn't be affected by this name release. Right at the top, a conversation starter of 3+ years of inactivity. I've taken breaks of 1 year too, alot of people have. This game honestly drains you with how many issues it has. I'm clearly talking about accounts that are long inactive, not your typical hiatus lengths.
-Second Bucket, "I played beta and just came back!!!!!!"
response: You prove the exception but in a thread that has at best 20 different posters? Yea not the norm. Those people who are the norm have quit. they arent coming back. Also, how come all the people who say they beta'd the game and just came back have forum accounts that are mere months old? At worst you're lieing and at best you did not provide feedback during the beta. ps. Check my account age (im gonna love the hate I get for that comment)
-Third Bucket, "NO way because its unfair I never even got an email from ESO when it went f2p or SWTOR/WOW when they changed naming policies"
Response: At a certain point the customer has a responsibility. If you make fake emails and don't have anyway to be contacted. That just to me proves more why customers who do have interest in playing the game should have your inactive names of 3,4,5, years freed up.
Summary: I didn't flesh out the entire idea for ZOS because they dont pay me to do these things. There's a certain expectation that they would properly inform customers of these intentions. Make it so that its an appropriate amount of inactivity with certain caveats (time spent in game, money spent etc) and generally attempt to weed out those who actually play ESO and those who dumped it.
To those that feel like they're proving the exception. "I really did play beta and JUST came back." I'm sorry, get over it. Guess what, you're back! Your names arent going anywhere.
Lady_Sleepless wrote: »
"Robin Graves" might be my favourite necromancer name now.

If it’s not a big deal for the people who would potentially lose their names in the future, then sit not a big deal that you have to get creative with a name you want today.
Either User1 or user234 will have to make a creative substitution. It takes less effort for user234 to be creative today than to go back and remove names from millions of accounts that came and paid money before user234 ever jumped in.
There are enough possible unique names for every character. So the simplest solution is to have player give a suitable unique name for their character. I prefer my names simple and short and have no trouble finding em.
I'd suggest instead of getting attached to a Spęcïål but common name pick a naming schema to generate lots of potential names. I myself have not yet ran out of short names for long objects in finnish.