I submitted feedback in game, but didn't have the space to say what I wanted... just curious how others feel.
I am an officer in a family of trade guilds (now two, was three... thus my issue). One of the guilds had to close as a trade guild, mainly because of the lack of participation and members. It was tough for the GMs to keep up all 3... so many of the members went into one of the other guilds, and some into the third... The main guild (for the purpose of this discussion) swelled to over 400 members, where the other was hovering about 300ish... Now, in a normal week, we get 15 applications, maybe a couple of more. Our dues are fair and we offer a lot, but I figured that maybe they scared some folks off or just lack of a playerbase needing another trade guild. Well what happened is all of a sudden we are getting 10+ applications a day, where our other guild (same requirements and actually had a trader in the same city), still struggled to get members... so looking at the Guild Finder (never really paid attention before), I see that the default is to put the more populated guilds first, and I can't seem to find any type of sort (other then the trader toggle)...
Now, my concerns... These are my opinions, but first, this doesn't seem fair, it makes the stronger trade guild stronger and the medium/small sized ones kinda get hosed... if there was a better/different set of sort abilities, I feel that the guild we had to close may have survived. What I have experienced, doing the old fashioned recruiting of yore, that people equate a higher trade guild population with it being a superior guild. I never found that true, but it seems to be the popular view.
I mean, why not keep 100-200 inactive accounts in the roster to pad your spot on the guild finder, and just weed them out slowly as you get more folks.
I am curious how others feel, am I wrong? (which, trust me, happens more often then not)
Eir