Buddy_Bradley wrote: »Name and shame, and report with screenshots.
OtarTheMad wrote: »There is no reason why anyone should do those things, or bully someone in general. I will never get people who say things like that, telling someone to go kill themselves, and then write it off an trolling. No my friend... that IS NOT trolling. It is a toxic thing to say, not even because you don't know the person you are saying it to, it just is.
This is a game and we are all here for fun. Sorry you went thru that @Kimid.
OtarTheMad wrote: »There is no reason why anyone should do those things, or bully someone in general. I will never get people who say things like that, telling someone to go kill themselves, and then write it off an trolling. No my friend... that IS NOT trolling. It is a toxic thing to say, not even because you don't know the person you are saying it to, it just is.
This is a game and we are all here for fun. Sorry you went thru that @Kimid.
Mate, you’re saying that as though there is any merit or benefit in trolling. The whole point of trolling is to humiliate another person.
There’s no difference between trolling and bullying, just like there’s no difference between banter and abuse, they’re just terms the bullies and abusers use to try to legitimise their actions. They’re still bullies and abusers and should not be tolerated.
OtarTheMad wrote: »There is no reason why anyone should do those things, or bully someone in general. I will never get people who say things like that, telling someone to go kill themselves, and then write it off an trolling. No my friend... that IS NOT trolling. It is a toxic thing to say, not even because you don't know the person you are saying it to, it just is.
This is a game and we are all here for fun. Sorry you went thru that @Kimid.
I agree with a portion of what you said. I disagree with the concept of someone being "complicit in the bullying" if they don't speak up. Regardless of how you look at it they are only responsible for their actions, and I would never expect someone to intervene between a dispute between two people if they are not directly involved.
I agree with a portion of what you said. I disagree with the concept of someone being "complicit in the bullying" if they don't speak up. Regardless of how you look at it they are only responsible for their actions, and I would never expect someone to intervene between a dispute between two people if they are not directly involved.
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
I vehemently disagree.I agree with a portion of what you said. I disagree with the concept of someone being "complicit in the bullying" if they don't speak up. Regardless of how you look at it they are only responsible for their actions, and I would never expect someone to intervene between a dispute between two people if they are not directly involved.
I agree with a portion of what you said. I disagree with the concept of someone being "complicit in the bullying" if they don't speak up. Regardless of how you look at it they are only responsible for their actions, and I would never expect someone to intervene between a dispute between two people if they are not directly involved.
In schools we have an authority figure such as a parent or teacher. That role is filled by Zenimax on ESO.
Another thing, during this entire time you did not feel it necessary to utilize the ignore/mute feature that so many services implement for situations just like this. What is the purpose of developers putting this option in if people don't utilize it?
I didn't say that I didn't report them, only that it isn't a deterrent for.them I have had numerous supportive messages from people who do know them, have seen the conversation, and are not happy. The only thing that will work to deter this kind of bullying is really ensuring there are no more bystanders egging them on. Without an audience they may just move on from game.
I vehemently disagree.I agree with a portion of what you said. I disagree with the concept of someone being "complicit in the bullying" if they don't speak up. Regardless of how you look at it they are only responsible for their actions, and I would never expect someone to intervene between a dispute between two people if they are not directly involved.
If you witness someone being harassed or bullied or molested, it is your civic duty to speak up and support the victim (within reason). It is the very foundation of a free and just society.
Bullying is not a "dispute". It is the intentional harassment of others who are not of equal strength in that situation.
NB: Referring to the incident as described by the OP.
I vehemently disagree.I agree with a portion of what you said. I disagree with the concept of someone being "complicit in the bullying" if they don't speak up. Regardless of how you look at it they are only responsible for their actions, and I would never expect someone to intervene between a dispute between two people if they are not directly involved.
If you witness someone being harassed or bullied or molested, it is your civic duty to speak up and support the victim (within reason). It is the very foundation of a free and just society.
Bullying is not a "dispute". It is the intentional harassment of others who are not of equal strength in that situation.
NB: Referring to the incident as described by the OP.
In my opinion people have no obligation to involve themself in something that can get themselves in any form of danger, whether that be physical or emotional.
What you can do is get someone with authority involved. Such a parent, teacher, police officer.
And just for the record and to establish a baseline the definition for bullying is
: abuse and mistreatment of someone vulnerable by someone stronger, more powerful, etc. : the actions and behavior of a bully
I disagree this fits the scenario described in OP. From what I can tell it was her and one other person. Both have the capability to end the conversation at any moment through the use of in service mute/block features. So I do not interpret any lack of power on either side.
Now I did overlook that the personal information had been posted in a public chat (I am assuming ESOs public chat), in this case I agree with the other posted above who said to take screenshots and report the situation to Zenimax. That is definitely a bannable offense.
Alienoutlaw wrote: »I vehemently disagree.I agree with a portion of what you said. I disagree with the concept of someone being "complicit in the bullying" if they don't speak up. Regardless of how you look at it they are only responsible for their actions, and I would never expect someone to intervene between a dispute between two people if they are not directly involved.
If you witness someone being harassed or bullied or molested, it is your civic duty to speak up and support the victim (within reason). It is the very foundation of a free and just society.
Bullying is not a "dispute". It is the intentional harassment of others who are not of equal strength in that situation.
NB: Referring to the incident as described by the OP.
In my opinion people have no obligation to involve themself in something that can get themselves in any form of danger, whether that be physical or emotional.
What you can do is get someone with authority involved. Such a parent, teacher, police officer.
And just for the record and to establish a baseline the definition for bullying is
: abuse and mistreatment of someone vulnerable by someone stronger, more powerful, etc. : the actions and behavior of a bully
I disagree this fits the scenario described in OP. From what I can tell it was her and one other person. Both have the capability to end the conversation at any moment through the use of in service mute/block features. So I do not interpret any lack of power on either side.
Now I did overlook that the personal information had been posted in a public chat (I am assuming ESOs public chat), in this case I agree with the other posted above who said to take screenshots and report the situation to Zenimax. That is definitely a bannable offense.
you dont have to be "vulnerable" to be bullied and the bully is usually weaker and finds the safety of the internet as their strength, and to correct your definition ANY action towards another person ment to cause distress or upset as a deliberate act is bullying.
Alienoutlaw wrote: »I vehemently disagree.I agree with a portion of what you said. I disagree with the concept of someone being "complicit in the bullying" if they don't speak up. Regardless of how you look at it they are only responsible for their actions, and I would never expect someone to intervene between a dispute between two people if they are not directly involved.
If you witness someone being harassed or bullied or molested, it is your civic duty to speak up and support the victim (within reason). It is the very foundation of a free and just society.
Bullying is not a "dispute". It is the intentional harassment of others who are not of equal strength in that situation.
NB: Referring to the incident as described by the OP.
In my opinion people have no obligation to involve themself in something that can get themselves in any form of danger, whether that be physical or emotional.
What you can do is get someone with authority involved. Such a parent, teacher, police officer.
And just for the record and to establish a baseline the definition for bullying is
: abuse and mistreatment of someone vulnerable by someone stronger, more powerful, etc. : the actions and behavior of a bully
I disagree this fits the scenario described in OP. From what I can tell it was her and one other person. Both have the capability to end the conversation at any moment through the use of in service mute/block features. So I do not interpret any lack of power on either side.
Now I did overlook that the personal information had been posted in a public chat (I am assuming ESOs public chat), in this case I agree with the other posted above who said to take screenshots and report the situation to Zenimax. That is definitely a bannable offense.
you dont have to be "vulnerable" to be bullied and the bully is usually weaker and finds the safety of the internet as their strength, and to correct your definition ANY action towards another person ment to cause distress or upset as a deliberate act is bullying.
Rave the Histborn wrote: »Buddy_Bradley wrote: »Name and shame, and report with screenshots.
It's against TOS, she'd end up getting herself in trouble over it instead of them. I'm sorry to hear that it happened though
You do know that his kind of behavior just encourages bullies? Some decide to bully just because dramaqueen-behavior infuriates them so much they no longer care to be polite.
Zos already is to point of fascism with their politically correct-policy enforcement.
Alienoutlaw wrote: »I vehemently disagree.I agree with a portion of what you said. I disagree with the concept of someone being "complicit in the bullying" if they don't speak up. Regardless of how you look at it they are only responsible for their actions, and I would never expect someone to intervene between a dispute between two people if they are not directly involved.
If you witness someone being harassed or bullied or molested, it is your civic duty to speak up and support the victim (within reason). It is the very foundation of a free and just society.
Bullying is not a "dispute". It is the intentional harassment of others who are not of equal strength in that situation.
NB: Referring to the incident as described by the OP.
In my opinion people have no obligation to involve themself in something that can get themselves in any form of danger, whether that be physical or emotional.
What you can do is get someone with authority involved. Such a parent, teacher, police officer.
And just for the record and to establish a baseline the definition for bullying is
: abuse and mistreatment of someone vulnerable by someone stronger, more powerful, etc. : the actions and behavior of a bully
I disagree this fits the scenario described in OP. From what I can tell it was her and one other person. Both have the capability to end the conversation at any moment through the use of in service mute/block features. So I do not interpret any lack of power on either side.
Now I did overlook that the personal information had been posted in a public chat (I am assuming ESOs public chat), in this case I agree with the other posted above who said to take screenshots and report the situation to Zenimax. That is definitely a bannable offense.
you dont have to be "vulnerable" to be bullied and the bully is usually weaker and finds the safety of the internet as their strength, and to correct your definition ANY action towards another person ment to cause distress or upset as a deliberate act is bullying.
I was just using Merriam-Webster as a baseline. If you would prefer a different source for the definition I would be fine to hear which you use.
Regardless, in my opinion there were actions that could have been taken to prevent this from progressing as far as it did. Now do not twist that into saying I am blaming her or justifying the other players actions because I am not. I just feel this could have ended much quicker if the tools had been utilized.
EDIT: here is the Oxford English Dictionary.
the use of strength or power to frighten or hurt weaker people