that helps how? snapshots of random players, not a true feel for what the class does but to the OP, everything is "viable"....go nuts!! :P
that helps how? snapshots of random players, not a true feel for what the class does but to the OP, everything is "viable"....go nuts!! :P
Yes, snapshots of players who log their dps in the various situations in game is helpful to someone asking if their old DPS is acceptable/ up to scratch - Not to mention he said that was his DPS, not is. Saying any class is "viable" is common sense, but yes there's better classes.
Actually magwarden and stamwarden can barely be considered viable in pve content. Stamina has it ever so slightly better but I mean? Why? Why go through all the effort gearing up a character that is going to leave both you and your team mates aggravated in pve?
Also even if your a god tier DPS player and can make it work your going to run into groups and situations where other players are so bad you want to be the good DPS class so you can make up for their bad dps. I am still seething at being tricked into warden. I was told "everything" was viable and it really isn't. Warden main for over a year.
I have not played since March of last year and used to pull 40k DPS with my StamDK. Is it still a viable DPS, or is the magblade too OP to refuse?