It does make you wonder what the point of 5 weeks of PTS testing actually was.
Either these problems were evident (and ignored), or the testing regime is not fit for purpose.
You can’t continually release duff, half arsed products and expect there to be no consequences. You can’t keep having the same old rehashed events when you know they are going to crush your servers, bring the game down and thoroughly p*** off your entire playerbase.
You can imagine the planning meeting that goes, “well after a lamentable track record of server failure, shutdowns and disruption following the launch of any single event or content, we’re going to try launching a new DLS, hosting one of the most popular events and introducing performance updates in the same week”. What c***hat thought that that would be a good idea?
The really shocking thing is that no one on PC EU is at all surprised by this turn of events.
nryerson1025 wrote: »Crisis mode? This game's new user rate is accelerating quarter by quarter and that is top priority! I'm sorry to let you down but zenimax is not putting veteran player experience over bottom line--something many people don't seem to understand
seveneighttwoub17_ESO wrote: »New/returning player P.O.V. - I've been back and resubscribed for all of 6 days now. Of those 6 days, there have been three maintenance days. Is this the norm now? Will I play only 15 out of every 30 days I pay for?
seveneighttwoub17_ESO wrote: »New/returning player P.O.V. - I've been back and resubscribed for all of 6 days now. Of those 6 days, there have been three maintenance days. Is this the norm now? Will I play only 15 out of every 30 days I pay for?
nryerson1025 wrote: »Crisis mode? This game's new user rate is accelerating quarter by quarter and that is top priority! I'm sorry to let you down but zenimax is not putting veteran player experience over bottom line--something many people don't seem to understand
Umm but what is the difference between veteran player experience and "bottom line" in this particular case ? Is performance getting worse the more months You've played the game ? If more people is coming to the game then more people will experience performance issues , lags etc so it's even more important for developer to finally do something with it.

nryerson1025 wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »Crisis mode? This game's new user rate is accelerating quarter by quarter and that is top priority! I'm sorry to let you down but zenimax is not putting veteran player experience over bottom line--something many people don't seem to understand
Umm but what is the difference between veteran player experience and "bottom line" in this particular case ? Is performance getting worse the more months You've played the game ? If more people is coming to the game then more people will experience performance issues , lags etc so it's even more important for developer to finally do something with it.
You don't have to convince me. I've been playing for a long time and I completely agree with everything everyone is saying from my perspective. I just feel like the financial POV is not really considered here--zos is a business first and foremost. There are always new players to sign up--perhaps the amount of shorter term new players who, say, buy crowns to fund their new account, play for a year and bail and more profitable to ZoS than the 3-5 year players who spend money in the crown store on occasion.
Minnesinger wrote: »Deep thoughts why and what reason on NA. Yes there was a short rollback but given the situation on EU I prefer this to their problems that had lasted for hours. Looks like the hamster in Germany isn´t quite the match to NA. Or they have less effective spells to reanimate the hamsters. Soon both are back and hopefully better than before.
The Uninvited wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »Crisis mode? This game's new user rate is accelerating quarter by quarter and that is top priority! I'm sorry to let you down but zenimax is not putting veteran player experience over bottom line--something many people don't seem to understand
Umm but what is the difference between veteran player experience and "bottom line" in this particular case ? Is performance getting worse the more months You've played the game ? If more people is coming to the game then more people will experience performance issues , lags etc so it's even more important for developer to finally do something with it.
You don't have to convince me. I've been playing for a long time and I completely agree with everything everyone is saying from my perspective. I just feel like the financial POV is not really considered here--zos is a business first and foremost. There are always new players to sign up--perhaps the amount of shorter term new players who, say, buy crowns to fund their new account, play for a year and bail and more profitable to ZoS than the 3-5 year players who spend money in the crown store on occasion.
Been playing for 5 years and so far spent over 1200 euro in that time. Would have been probably more IF these things didn't happen. For instance, I was thinking about buying the Wraith home (another 90 euro) but right now I'm thinking "forget about it".
nryerson1025 wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »Crisis mode? This game's new user rate is accelerating quarter by quarter and that is top priority! I'm sorry to let you down but zenimax is not putting veteran player experience over bottom line--something many people don't seem to understand
Umm but what is the difference between veteran player experience and "bottom line" in this particular case ? Is performance getting worse the more months You've played the game ? If more people is coming to the game then more people will experience performance issues , lags etc so it's even more important for developer to finally do something with it.
You don't have to convince me. I've been playing for a long time and I completely agree with everything everyone is saying from my perspective. I just feel like the financial POV is not really considered here--zos is a business first and foremost. There are always new players to sign up--perhaps the amount of shorter term new players who, say, buy crowns to fund their new account, play for a year and bail and more profitable to ZoS than the 3-5 year players who spend money in the crown store on occasion.
Been playing for 5 years and so far spent over 1200 euro in that time. Would have been probably more IF these things didn't happen. For instance, I was thinking about buying the Wraith home (another 90 euro) but right now I'm thinking "forget about it".
what i'm trying to argue here is that maybe the people who have financial data at their fingertips know what's more profitable than an individual player. Maybe with the resources of a $2B+ what we're perceiving is a bit more complicated than gross incompetence.
The Uninvited wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »Crisis mode? This game's new user rate is accelerating quarter by quarter and that is top priority! I'm sorry to let you down but zenimax is not putting veteran player experience over bottom line--something many people don't seem to understand
Umm but what is the difference between veteran player experience and "bottom line" in this particular case ? Is performance getting worse the more months You've played the game ? If more people is coming to the game then more people will experience performance issues , lags etc so it's even more important for developer to finally do something with it.
You don't have to convince me. I've been playing for a long time and I completely agree with everything everyone is saying from my perspective. I just feel like the financial POV is not really considered here--zos is a business first and foremost. There are always new players to sign up--perhaps the amount of shorter term new players who, say, buy crowns to fund their new account, play for a year and bail and more profitable to ZoS than the 3-5 year players who spend money in the crown store on occasion.
Been playing for 5 years and so far spent over 1200 euro in that time. Would have been probably more IF these things didn't happen. For instance, I was thinking about buying the Wraith home (another 90 euro) but right now I'm thinking "forget about it".
what i'm trying to argue here is that maybe the people who have financial data at their fingertips know what's more profitable than an individual player. Maybe with the resources of a $2B+ what we're perceiving is a bit more complicated than gross incompetence.
I know, I have been working in trade business for multinationals for the better part of my life now. However, one thing I learned in those years is this:
"If you crap on your long-term customers, they'll NEVER buy any product from you again!"
nryerson1025 wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »The Uninvited wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »nryerson1025 wrote: »Crisis mode? This game's new user rate is accelerating quarter by quarter and that is top priority! I'm sorry to let you down but zenimax is not putting veteran player experience over bottom line--something many people don't seem to understand
Umm but what is the difference between veteran player experience and "bottom line" in this particular case ? Is performance getting worse the more months You've played the game ? If more people is coming to the game then more people will experience performance issues , lags etc so it's even more important for developer to finally do something with it.
You don't have to convince me. I've been playing for a long time and I completely agree with everything everyone is saying from my perspective. I just feel like the financial POV is not really considered here--zos is a business first and foremost. There are always new players to sign up--perhaps the amount of shorter term new players who, say, buy crowns to fund their new account, play for a year and bail and more profitable to ZoS than the 3-5 year players who spend money in the crown store on occasion.
Been playing for 5 years and so far spent over 1200 euro in that time. Would have been probably more IF these things didn't happen. For instance, I was thinking about buying the Wraith home (another 90 euro) but right now I'm thinking "forget about it".
what i'm trying to argue here is that maybe the people who have financial data at their fingertips know what's more profitable than an individual player. Maybe with the resources of a $2B+ what we're perceiving is a bit more complicated than gross incompetence.
I know, I have been working in trade business for multinationals for the better part of my life now. However, one thing I learned in those years is this:
"If you crap on your long-term customers, they'll NEVER buy any product from you again!"
that's correct. but other new customers will.
seveneighttwoub17_ESO wrote: »Hemorrhaging old customers is not healthy for a company that wants to stay in business. Those new customers will one day be old customers. A wise and successful company, one would think, would try to find a balance between gaining new customers and maintaining old ones.
nryerson1025 wrote: »Crisis mode? This game's new user rate is accelerating quarter by quarter and that is top priority! I'm sorry to let you down but zenimax is not putting veteran player experience over bottom line--something many people don't seem to understand
LiquidPony wrote: »It does make you wonder what the point of 5 weeks of PTS testing actually was.
Either these problems were evident (and ignored), or the testing regime is not fit for purpose.
You can’t continually release duff, half arsed products and expect there to be no consequences. You can’t keep having the same old rehashed events when you know they are going to crush your servers, bring the game down and thoroughly p*** off your entire playerbase.
You can imagine the planning meeting that goes, “well after a lamentable track record of server failure, shutdowns and disruption following the launch of any single event or content, we’re going to try launching a new DLS, hosting one of the most popular events and introducing performance updates in the same week”. What c***hat thought that that would be a good idea?
The really shocking thing is that no one on PC EU is at all surprised by this turn of events.
PTS was a total ghost town for the first 3 weeks because the DoT changes were so obviously stupid that no one even bothered testing them.
Realistically we had about a 10-day PTS period this time around. The final two weeks had delayed releases, failed account copies, and maintenance downtime.
ZOS is doing a horrible job all around right now.
The Uninvited wrote: »Wouldn't like to see them going the same route as EA games has taken in the past. That's all I'm saying.
seveneighttwoub17_ESO wrote: »New/returning player P.O.V. - I've been back and resubscribed for all of 6 days now. Of those 6 days, there have been three maintenance days. Is this the norm now? Will I play only 15 out of every 30 days I pay for?
seveneighttwoub17_ESO wrote: »New/returning player P.O.V. - I've been back and resubscribed for all of 6 days now. Of those 6 days, there have been three maintenance days. Is this the norm now? Will I play only 15 out of every 30 days I pay for?
No, its not the norm. Theres usually a small patch in the middle of the night each month. This extra maintenance only happens with new DLC’s, which went live on the 21st. These forums get over ran by impatient people that cry alot. Most of the Lag you hear about is people thinking their system can handle the game at max settings, which in turn it can’t so they’ll blame ZOS or the people have far to many addons conflicting with something causing poor performance. These forums become toxic when there’s an unscheduled maintenance.
seveneighttwoub17_ESO wrote: »New/returning player P.O.V. - I've been back and resubscribed for all of 6 days now. Of those 6 days, there have been three maintenance days. Is this the norm now? Will I play only 15 out of every 30 days I pay for?
No, its not the norm. Theres usually a small patch in the middle of the night each month. This extra maintenance only happens with new DLC’s, which went live on the 21st. These forums get over ran by impatient people that cry alot. Most of the Lag you hear about is people thinking their system can handle the game at max settings, which in turn it can’t so they’ll blame ZOS or the people have far to many addons conflicting with something causing poor performance. These forums become toxic when there’s an unscheduled maintenance.