Maintenance for the week of April 13:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 13
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 13
How about a new, smaller PvP zone?
-
Cerotonin✭✭✭Yes please!I’d want something fun in the theme of Sheogorath.
• A zone portable like Arteum/Clockwork City/ Coldharbour.
• Everyone can kill everyone in the zone, it’s all chaos. Alliances don’t matter.
• A safe area to meet others and probably get a chance to talk
• You can’t heal everyone, but you can group up with people, but face a penalty or debuffs depending on the group size.
• In terms of design, it could be a bit wonky and warped. Open fields, destroyed and distorted buildings/castles, etc.
Honestly just an idea. Something different from Cyro and IC though.0 -
FierceSam✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Other (type in comment)I would hope that the updated group finder would allow for a much greater ambition and choice in PvP Battlegrounds. So ideally the players could set their own numbers 1v1v1, 2v2v2, 12v12v12 etc, choose a map and game type etc
That way, ZOS could continue to develop PvP maps and challenges alongside the PvE zones.
I don’t see ZOS putting a load of effort into zone wide PvP until they have resolved or worked around the issues that make Cyrodiil so tedious.
I would imagine that they will also assess whether there is enough demand for new PvP content by seeing how IC develops post-event now they are making it free to all.0 -
Tommy_The_Gun✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Other (type in comment)At this point it would simply be waste of a zone & resources.
Make pvp working with less lag, fix performance 1st - then we can talk.0 -
InvictusApollo✭✭✭✭✭
✭Yes please!You mean something like Batlegrounds?
Nope - bigger.Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »At this point it would simply be waste of a zone & resources.
Make pvp working with less lag, fix performance 1st - then we can talk.
I have abandoned any hope that ZOS will fix Cyrodill's lag. That is why I'm thinking about new PvP zone that is smaller, has much smaller population but gives us all the fun that Cyrodill used to.1 -
kargen27✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭NahPvE gets new content because PvE needs new content to survive. PvP needs a lot of players all in one place doing battle with each other. Any new PvP content added comes at the expense of existing content and in the long run would be the end of viable PvP in the game.
That said it might be fun if there were a strictly PvP event once or twice a year that opened up either the battlegrounds or an instance of Imperial City for a week to allow chaos to ensue. Might be a programming nightmare but it might be interesting to use one of the trial maps for a week of PvP mayhem. No alliances just go in and kill. While we are dreaming maybe two instances. One that is full on everybody against everybody with no groups and another where players go in as groups of eight. No objectives in either other than hunt and kill other players.
If it were permanent it would be bad for PvP but one or two weeks a year would work I think.and then the parrot said, "must be the water mines green too."0 -
DTStormfox✭✭✭✭✭NahA smaller PvP location with smaller populations?
What about Imperial City? Oh yeah, people forgot about its existence.1 -
ChefZero✭✭✭✭Yes please!InvictusApollo wrote: »But what kind of mechanics/objects? No Battle Royal please
I don't know. Something awesome that we should come up with. I just realized that every dlc there is a new PvE zone but nothing new for PvP.
Maybe put two sides and a huge keep with multiple walls, forts and defenses. One team attacks and the other defends. Something like sieges in Conqueror's Blade. That game has awesome PvP.
Or maybe two keeps/cores and some lanes defended by watchtowers - MOBA style.
Even smaller version of Cyrodill would be nice.
I would love to see someting like WoWs bigger battlegrounds or conquer mode from battlefront/field.PC EU - DC only0 -
Starlock✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Other (type in comment)I wouldn't use it one way or another, but if the folks who are interested want it, why not?0
