Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Wow, it's almost like they're individuals with their own wants and opinions, and not some big generalized group defined exclusively by unfair stereotypes and run like a hive mind
I wonder what that's like.
https://youtu.be/PJ3FG4FhEqQBrianLovesLisa wrote: »Hmm i think a lot of the lag is on the players side, I never seem to have issues in the mass population areas >.> then again I don't play on a toaster.
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Wow, it's almost like they're individuals with their own wants and opinions, and not some big generalized group defined exclusively by unfair stereotypes and run like a hive mind
I wonder what that's like.
I dunno, maybe we'll see when folk stop being sheep.
We'll have a rerun of this next PvP event, and the one after that, and the one after that. I daresay the one after that as well. Just like this one is a rerun of what has come before. I already have more AP/TV than I can spend, and really don't need ridiculous queues to join a campaign and/or any more zerg lag.
PvP is stuffed, performance wise, so anyone calling more more "events" for PvP is off their heads.
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Wow, it's almost like they're individuals with their own wants and opinions, and not some big generalized group defined exclusively by unfair stereotypes and run like a hive mind
I wonder what that's like.
I dunno, maybe we'll see when folk stop being sheep.
We'll have a rerun of this next PvP event, and the one after that, and the one after that. I daresay the one after that as well. Just like this one is a rerun of what has come before. I already have more AP/TV than I can spend, and really don't need ridiculous queues to join a campaign and/or any more zerg lag.
PvP is stuffed, performance wise, so anyone calling more more "events" for PvP is off their heads.
Maybe you should lead with calling out people who're calling for more events, rather than lumping everybody PVPer together and destroying your own argument in the process then.
Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
I think Alcast said it best when talking about the upcoming performance updates.
This isn't going to be some end all/be all fix. At best, you'll see an improvement of 5, maybe 10 frames.https://youtu.be/PJ3FG4FhEqQ
While the update is much needed, I think people are putting a little too much hope in it.
Seems to me the first run consoles (meaning not the PS4 pro, for example, but the normal version) will see the biggest performance boosts. For everyone else, I'm sure it'll still help...a little.
Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Wow thats crazy, its a rare occasion that I meet someone who can't read but can type.. It does happen though, oddly enough its usually on the forums. Well anyway ill help you out a bit.
I mean Im happy to have a pvp event but since I have to deal with this laggy mess, and have had to for years, im still going to voice my sheer disgust with the whole thing.
Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Wow thats crazy, its a rare occasion that I meet someone who can't read but can type.. It does happen though, oddly enough its usually on the forums. Well anyway ill help you out a bit.
I mean Im happy to have a pvp event but since I have to deal with this laggy mess, and have had to for years, im still going to voice my sheer disgust with the whole thing.
I'm legitimately confused as to what you think you've gained with PvP events though? OK, IC revives life into a dead zone temporarily, but the cyro events? You've got an event that's nominally for PvPers, where you gain even more extraneous and largely useless AP, and gain extra lag and increased queue times. It's not really a gift, is it? And now IC is a laggy mess like cyrodiil, but hey, at least it's an "event", right? Yay!
Do people really want an "event" that gives nothing but aggravation and decreased performance/play time?
But they've already tried to fix the faction stacking issues, by introducing the hammer to Cyrodiil... oh, waitHeres an idea, if you cant fix the game why not de-incentive people from grouping up in massive zergs? Honestly. If your servers cant handle it why allow it to go on. Because adding a couple campaigns isnt going to stop the issue which is a massive amount of people balling up to fight another massive amount of people.
because we literally get *** on every single day and every single update by zos. Must be nice to get new content every update. Must be nice to have regular events. Must be nice to have that content function for the most part. Not cyrodil. Not even *** close. Of course we want events.
Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Not to mention that it is reasonable to expect that a company won't introduce something its own servers can't handle (and they that they can't/won't mitigate for), even if it is asked for.
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Wow, it's almost like they're individuals with their own wants and opinions, and not some big generalized group defined exclusively by unfair stereotypes and run like a hive mind
I wonder what that's like.
I dunno, maybe we'll see when folk stop being sheep.
We'll have a rerun of this next PvP event, and the one after that, and the one after that. I daresay the one after that as well. Just like this one is a rerun of what has come before. I already have more AP/TV than I can spend, and really don't need ridiculous queues to join a campaign and/or any more zerg lag.
PvP is stuffed, performance wise, so anyone calling more more "events" for PvP is off their heads.
Maybe you should lead with calling out people who're calling for more events, rather than lumping everybody PVPer together and destroying your own argument in the process then.
Why would I talk about something random and, at best, tangentially related to the OP?
Stop being all huffy about it. Events are bad, and PvP events are the worst. The point of difference is that when PvP events are cancelled, a whole mess of people start crying like it's a personal insult.
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Jesus. It never fails.
PvPers cry and moan about getting their "own event", because they want to be special, then when they get it they cry and moan about lonq queues and/or population induced lag.
I really do wonder about some of you.
Wow, it's almost like they're individuals with their own wants and opinions, and not some big generalized group defined exclusively by unfair stereotypes and run like a hive mind
I wonder what that's like.
I dunno, maybe we'll see when folk stop being sheep.
We'll have a rerun of this next PvP event, and the one after that, and the one after that. I daresay the one after that as well. Just like this one is a rerun of what has come before. I already have more AP/TV than I can spend, and really don't need ridiculous queues to join a campaign and/or any more zerg lag.
PvP is stuffed, performance wise, so anyone calling more more "events" for PvP is off their heads.
Maybe you should lead with calling out people who're calling for more events, rather than lumping everybody PVPer together and destroying your own argument in the process then.
Why would I talk about something random and, at best, tangentially related to the OP?
Stop being all huffy about it. Events are bad, and PvP events are the worst. The point of difference is that when PvP events are cancelled, a whole mess of people start crying like it's a personal insult.
ZOS can never win with this one. If they run a PvP event the players say they're stupid for adding to the performance problems PvPers have, while if they don't hold a PvP event then they're accused of ignoring PvPers.
Meanwhile they appear to be demanding that ZOS discourage zergs while seemingly being only too happy to keep joining them. Maybe they hold the answer to their problems themselves.
because we literally get *** on every single day and every single update by zos. Must be nice to get new content every update. Must be nice to have regular events. Must be nice to have that content function for the most part. Not cyrodil. Not even *** close. Of course we want events.
Well, if you like it just because you *nominally* get something, good for you. It's an empty gesture (and introduces new problems, as you've found out), but okay....
And you GOT new PvP content. It's called Imperial City, and 11.5 mths of the year it's dead, and even when it isn't, when Zos try to encourage new people to play it, you have idiots sitting outside the spawn points ganking people coming OUT of the base. Like they are in RD on XNA now. 3 reds, not a one lower than a 1 star, sitting there dark and ganking away. Doing so when people are coming in, sure, I can see, when they're fat and juicy with TV, but when they're coming out, with no TV on them? That's stupid. Zos try to encourage people to play the content, and PvPers straight away do their best to discourage them.