The Elder Scrolls Online

what's the point of ultimate number going to 500

Leave a Reply
Sergykid
Sergykid
✭✭✭✭✭
✭
not any ultimate uses that much amount. Don't know about all the ultimates in the game but i think the highest is at 350. DK class and Witchman Armor set use the amount of points of the ultimate's cost. So the point of ultimate going to 500 is for sorc's Overload? that's it? one class ability sets the points to 500?
-PC EU- / battlegrounds on my youtube
  • Vlad9425
    Vlad9425
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Sorc overload and the Balorgh monster set benefit from having ult stacked up.
  • CP5
    CP5
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    It used to cap at 1000, and the werewolf ultimate cost that much forever ago, if you were wondering.
  • Koolio
    Koolio
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    I’m pretty sure WW at level 1 still costs 400
  • Chrlynsch
    Chrlynsch
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    There are poisons that increase cost of ultimate.

    And also Molag Kena when procced increases the cost of your ultimate as well.
    Caius
    Pack Leader of Scourge Alliance- First Fang of Hircine, The Beast of Bruma
    PC NA
  • Jayman1000
    Jayman1000
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭
    nvm, others mentioned sorc overload, that must be it.
    Edited by Jayman1000 on August 8, 2019 10:22PM
  • jypcy
    jypcy
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    CP5 wrote: »
    It used to cap at 1000, and the werewolf ultimate cost that much forever ago, if you were wondering.

    Didn’t incap strike also scale with how much ultimate was used to spend it forever ago too?
  • Sergykid
    Sergykid
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭
    Vlad9425 wrote: »
    Sorc overload and the Balorgh monster set benefit from having ult stacked up.

    so Balorgh gives wep dmg based on how much ult i used, and not on how much the ult cost? so if i cast Dawnbreaker with 500 points of ult, i get 1000 weapon damage, and not 250?
    -PC EU- / battlegrounds on my youtube
  • NBrookus
    NBrookus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Sergykid wrote: »
    Vlad9425 wrote: »
    Sorc overload and the Balorgh monster set benefit from having ult stacked up.

    so Balorgh gives wep dmg based on how much ult i used, and not on how much the ult cost? so if i cast Dawnbreaker with 500 points of ult, i get 1000 weapon damage, and not 250?

    Yes.
  • TequilaFire
    TequilaFire
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Better yet why does an ultimate that cost 250 consume all 500 ultimate? lol
  • BNOC
    BNOC
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    TequilaFire wrote: »
    Better yet why does an ultimate that cost 250 consume all 500 ultimate? lol

    Because otherwise I'd smother you in dots, drop 2 meteors on you, gap closer and by that point, use my 3rd ultimate on you.

    That would be fun af though.
    vMSA - Magplar - Xbox EU - 15/11/16
    578,000 - 36 Minutes 58 Seconds (Top 2 World?)

    vMSA - Magplar - Xbox NA
    569,000 - 40 minutes (350CP, Non optimised runs)
  • TequilaFire
    TequilaFire
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yeah you could do that once till you regen the ultimate back.
    Overload benefits from being able to use the whole pool.
  • Blinkin8r
    Blinkin8r
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ballorgh my dude
    II Blinkin II
    Xbox 1 NA
    "A man without the sauce is lost, but the same man can become lost in the sauce."
  • TequilaFire
    TequilaFire
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sadly I fear a nerf incoming on that set as it is the go to right now.
  • red_emu
    red_emu
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    TequilaFire wrote: »
    Better yet why does an ultimate that cost 250 consume all 500 ultimate? lol

    Because:

    Incap
    Incap
    Incap
    Incap
    Incap
    Incap
    Incap strike
    PC - EU:
    Falathren Noctis - AD MagNecro
    Falathren - AD StamSorc
    Falathren Eryndaer - AD StamDen
    Falathren Irimion - AD MagPlar
    Talagan Falathren - AD StamDK
    Falathren Infernis - AD MagDK
    Your-Ex - AD MagBlade
  • DocFrost72
    DocFrost72
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    BNOC wrote: »
    TequilaFire wrote: »
    Better yet why does an ultimate that cost 250 consume all 500 ultimate? lol

    Because otherwise I'd smother you in dots, drop 2 meteors on you, gap closer and by that point, use my 3rd ultimate on you.

    That would be fun af though.

    Forget that, imagine being mauled by a warden bear.

    I almost want this to happen just for the spongebob sea bear memes.

    Edit:

    maxresdefault.jpg

    "An exposed nightblade orc attempts to flee from a Dominion Warden's Bear, 2e 583 colorized."
    Edited by DocFrost72 on August 9, 2019 3:21PM
  • TequilaFire
    TequilaFire
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    red_emu wrote: »
    TequilaFire wrote: »
    Better yet why does an ultimate that cost 250 consume all 500 ultimate? lol

    Because:

    Incap
    Incap
    Incap
    Incap
    Incap
    Incap
    Incap strike

    You can already do that with incap and the right build.

    But don't worry soon to be:

    Cast time
    Incap
    Cast time
    Incap
    Cast time
    Incap
    Cast time
    Incap
    Cast time
    Incap
    Cast time
    Incap
    Cast time
    Incap strike
    Edited by TequilaFire on August 9, 2019 3:15PM
  • Lightspeedflashb14_ESO
    Lightspeedflashb14_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    the sets that scale with your ultimate used, like the witchman the op mentioned and Lamia's Song, ought to scale with the amount stored up, like Balorghs, would go a long way to make them viable. (Lamia's Songs would need to be double regardless, with the set on, on my warden healer, warhorn is barely 9k healing. hardly worth anything). i would go far as to make the same thing apply to battleroar. that passive would not punish you for holding your ulti then.
    Edited by Lightspeedflashb14_ESO on August 9, 2019 3:15PM
  • Sergykid
    Sergykid
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭
    NBrookus wrote: »
    Sergykid wrote: »
    Vlad9425 wrote: »
    Sorc overload and the Balorgh monster set benefit from having ult stacked up.

    so Balorgh gives wep dmg based on how much ult i used, and not on how much the ult cost? so if i cast Dawnbreaker with 500 points of ult, i get 1000 weapon damage, and not 250?

    Yes.

    wow then the set is very valuable, especially in pvp. I always avoided this set because i thought it gives the amount of ultimate cost points used, not the amount you had. I can imagine the burst with 1k spell damage on a Soul Assault.

    Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »
    the sets that scale with your ultimate used, like the witchman the op mentioned and Lamia's Song, ought to scale with the amount stored up, like Balorghs, would go a long way to make them viable. (Lamia's Songs would need to be double regardless, with the set on, on my warden healer, warhorn is barely 9k healing. hardly worth anything). i would go far as to make the same thing apply to battleroar. that passive would not punish you for holding your ulti then.

    yeah those sets would really become viable if they worked like Balorgh
    -PC EU- / battlegrounds on my youtube
Sign In or Register to comment.