Why don't you reserve judgement until after they've had a chance to work on their role?
Seraphayel wrote: »It’s good if there’s a balance between player groups. I don’t want the reps to be neither exclusively top tier players nor potatoes. A nice mixture is good because it helps with perspective.
Who even chose these people in the first place?
No one even knows these people.
From what I see by googling, a random youtuber(some of whose primary focus is not even ESO to begin with), low mmr pvpers who doesnt know impen exists, bottom tier Pvpers that try to propagate the defensive heavy armor sets over anything else, PvErs who believe 30k dps is the gold standard.
Apart from Nefas, none of the rest seem to have any real top-tier endgame experience.
Are you kidding me, ZOS? You had top tier people applying to a payless voluntary job because of their passion for the game.
Seraphayel wrote: »It’s good if there’s a balance between player groups. I don’t want the reps to be neither exclusively top tier players nor potatoes. A nice mixture is good because it helps with perspective.
So z...., excuse me large-scalers being able to influence the game feels like the exact time the game goes downhill.
Talk about a z-term Pvper, lul.
Seraphayel wrote: »It’s good if there’s a balance between player groups. I don’t want the reps to be neither exclusively top tier players nor potatoes. A nice mixture is good because it helps with perspective.
So z...., excuse me large-scalers being able to influence the game feels like the exact time the game goes downhill.
Seraphayel wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »It’s good if there’s a balance between player groups. I don’t want the reps to be neither exclusively top tier players nor potatoes. A nice mixture is good because it helps with perspective.
So z...., excuse me large-scalers being able to influence the game feels like the exact time the game goes downhill.
Yeah and others say the game goes downhill when class reps are solely top tier trial players. As I said, a broad spectrum of perspectives is good for that program.
TequilaFire wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »It’s good if there’s a balance between player groups. I don’t want the reps to be neither exclusively top tier players nor potatoes. A nice mixture is good because it helps with perspective.
So z...., excuse me large-scalers being able to influence the game feels like the exact time the game goes downhill.
Er pardon me, why shouldn't the majority of players have a say instead of a handful of potato farmers?
Why do you think only few players should be responsible for skill ballancing? Everyone has different playstyles.
Ballancing should be done by majority of players. We have forums here. Devs should read our posts and polls, and decide by it