...well
You say choices have consequences .. why should they? And says who?
I mean, that's absolutely arbitrary, as far as point of view goes.
If we can remove all negatives consequences of a given choice, why shouldn't we?
Wouldn't the "total happiness" be maximized? Except, that is, if the happiness of other peoples decrease yours ..
And please, don't compare life in a game to life in our harsh real world .. it's also beside the point, and makes the whole arguments seems elitist ..
Vampires in Skyrim was pretty easy to spot. Harder so in Oblivion but downsides was larger, same in older games.ArcaneusIII wrote: »...well
You say choices have consequences .. why should they? And says who?
I mean, that's absolutely arbitrary, as far as point of view goes.
If we can remove all negatives consequences of a given choice, why shouldn't we?
Wouldn't the "total happiness" be maximized? Except, that is, if the happiness of other peoples decrease yours ..
And please, don't compare life in a game to life in our harsh real world .. it's also beside the point, and makes the whole arguments seems elitist ..
Most of us when we say what we say are not trying to project what we think in a mean spirited way. I just believe that when a majority of people ask for something like skins then ZOS will make it priority to focus more on crown store skin than game design. You say you want to hide your vampirism.
Did you know there are different vampire strains in TES lore that can completely hide their looks, instead of asking for a skin mask why not ask for something like a new strain that changes your gameplay and lets you hide your "ugly" nature, even if its a slight change. It adds to the variety.
I believe this is a wrong way to go about asking for something specially skins. ZOS is already focusing too much on crownstore and honestly I would like them to focus more vamps game design more than skins.
Don't take it to heart man. Most of us really like TES lore and don't want crown store to be a priority.