mann9753b16_ESO wrote: »But in ESO, you just make these people exist. Thats it. No big deal made about it, no forced moral lesson, hell, in many cases you can miss it if you dont listen carefully. Its just a part of life in ESO, as it should be. And you never have the feeling that these Characters were created with their sexuality as a primary character trait. They are just characters who happen to be that way.
That one hit me right in the feels.Totally agree.
I really like the way this is done. It is both subtle and full of deep meaning. I like the way that in a world of war, constant slaughter and dragons, there are little pockets of love hidden away.
My personal favourite is The Flower of Youth
I like the way that in a world of war, constant slaughter and dragons, there are little pockets of love hidden away.

Agree'd, can't stand it in other games just feels like SJW cancer. In ESO it feels natural.
"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.”
― Robert E. Howard
Rain_Greyraven wrote: »
mann9753b16_ESO wrote: »Rain_Greyraven wrote: »
I am in Summerset right now, I didnt see anything that felt forced here... actually, a quest in Summerset gave me the final push to make this Thread
AcadianPaladin wrote: »I rather enjoyed talking to an Argonian NPC in Murkmire who explained that some Argonians can and do change gender via the Hist. I thought that was both clever and intriguing.
Dinokstrun wrote: »Absolutely dead right. It's not forced in your face like you see in tv shows and movies these days. Too much forced agenda makes it feel unbearable.
Dinokstrun wrote: »Absolutely dead right. It's not forced in your face like you see in tv shows and movies these days. Too much forced agenda makes it feel unbearable.
I may not be understanding you correctly. But why is it considered "forcing" someone's sexuality when it's presented in an overt way only when it comes to homosexuality?
I don't recall this same argument being made during the thousands (perhaps millions) of shows and movies that have heterosexual relationships thrust on the screen in graphic detail.
Dinokstrun wrote: »Absolutely dead right. It's not forced in your face like you see in tv shows and movies these days. Too much forced agenda makes it feel unbearable.
I may not be understanding you correctly. But why is it considered "forcing" someone's sexuality when it's presented in an overt way only when it comes to homosexuality?
I don't recall this same argument being made during the thousands (perhaps millions) of shows and movies that have heterosexual relationships thrust on the screen in graphic detail. So I've never understood the logic behind this argument that in order to represent homosexuals you have to be subtle with how you present it - otherwise you are "forcing" it.
mann9753b16_ESO wrote: »Dinokstrun wrote: »Absolutely dead right. It's not forced in your face like you see in tv shows and movies these days. Too much forced agenda makes it feel unbearable.
I may not be understanding you correctly. But why is it considered "forcing" someone's sexuality when it's presented in an overt way only when it comes to homosexuality?
I don't recall this same argument being made during the thousands (perhaps millions) of shows and movies that have heterosexual relationships thrust on the screen in graphic detail. So I've never understood the logic behind this argument that in order to represent homosexuals you have to be subtle with how you present it - otherwise you are "forcing" it.
The main problem about this, and why it feels really force, is that most times the sexuality is the main character trait, and its also often paired with over the top virtue signaling.
The point isnt that you have to be subtle, the point is that you should present these characters naturally. A Character that reminds you every 5 minutes how homosexual or transexual he is really defeats the purpose here. And before you ask, yes, heterosexual characters whos main characteristic is their sexuality are just as bad.