Guessing you mean BGs?

But yeah matchmaking is dreadful.

I think the system is a lot more flexible then people make it out to be. I have no idea how many BGs I’ve done, maybe a thousand?

I don’t have long queues times because I don’t premade. I think the people with 15 minutes plus are premade queuers, but I’m not sure because I haven’t experienced it. I’m usually 5-10 minutes.

Sometimes I’ll get people at the highest MMR and sometimes people under CP160. It’s weird. Some clarity would be awesome.

like when there are not many players online i sometimes see matchups with each of the 3 teams having one amazing player while the rest gets carried. thing is sometimes u get the feeling.... "hey thats not fair this dude have that healer and this guy while i dont" if we would have numbers it would be less of a pain when u see that the matchmaking made kinda fair teams.

u just gotta know what ur dealing with. like "ok i have 2 low teammates i gotta step back and defend those and not rush in the battle expecting they would follow"

idk how much sense that makes for others but i rly like to have some sort of indicator. the system dont need to be as accurate as in overwatch.

CatchMeTrolling wrote: »

Would honestly add another level of toxicity to bgs if you really think about it.

I might yea. It would also add something too, people would be able to compete and try to get their MMR as high as possible.

It’s like poker. Playing poker for fun gets boring fast, play it for a nominal amount to track your results and it’s a lot more fun.

Queues on my templar are ridiculous sometimes. However, i think mmr is about character lifetime score and then they create teams with similar sum lifetime scores. That's why u get 1 good player and 3 bad vs 2 decent and 2 awful.

Ive also played against teams of 4 great players with 3 god awful players and im thinking to myself, let's turn the game off and do something else.

How the greek does it actually work? I doubt zos even knows. I mean, look at the way the teams get generated, hiting accept 30 times before entering. It's just poorly done in general.

Donny_Vito wrote: »

Iskiab wrote: »

I think the system is a lot more flexible then people make it out to be. I have no idea how many BGs I’ve done, maybe a thousand?

I don’t have long queues times because I don’t premade. I think the people with 15 minutes plus are premade queuers, but I’m not sure because I haven’t experienced it. I’m usually 5-10 minutes.

Sometimes I’ll get people at the highest MMR and sometimes people under CP160. It’s weird. Some clarity would be awesome.

How do you know they are the highest MMR? Do you actually know, or are you just making the assumption they are?

Assuming they are, it’s hard to tell. Thoguard mentioned he is and I remember seeing him and the Dottz guy together on an opposite team. Think they were on DKs.

I usually play in the morning in the EST time zone, anyone know a name I can look for to tell?

One thing I’ve noticed is during prime time there’s a tighter range in skill level. When not a lot different of people are on you get wildly different skill levels for team mates.

By Leena do you mean LeenaPeena Warden (or something like that) and YK’Cid Sorc (or something like that) are the only names I see a lot.

hunter937 wrote: »

I’d love a visible MMR score. I think that would be very very cool. That’s something someone at endgame can be proud of, take pride in and continue to build over time. Also I think a great feature would be to lower MMR after consistent poor performance in PvP. Let people fight within their bracket so they aren’t getting stomped every time the jump into a BG

Yea I agree. People love stats and competition for rank would add another dimension in pvp.

Did 5 bgs today. Had a total of 19 different people. Out of a potential 55.