Why?
DK is fine.
Basically you're asking for DK's to have the same as Wardens & Necros.
That's just silly.
Learn to use the DK as it should be and there isn't a problem.
Besides, Necros are going to change immensely in the next couple of months. We all know it.
Sanctimonia wrote: »Dragon knights are actually one of the best classes regarding passives, still. Take your time to check out that of templars'.
Increases the damage of Fiery Breath, Searing Strike, and Dragonknight Standard abilities by 3% and the duration by 2 seconds.
Increases the duration of Earthen Heart abilities by 20%.
Why?
DK is fine.
Basically you're asking for DK's to have the same as Wardens & Necros.
That's just silly.
Learn to use the DK as it should be and there isn't a problem.
Besides, Necros are going to change immensely in the next couple of months. We all know it.
can u take a round on dk passives?
how you saying its fine?
I'm been playing mdk since launch never played any other class not just me saying that & I'm talk about mdk on pvp environment.
Why?
DK is fine.
Basically you're asking for DK's to have the same as Wardens & Necros.
That's just silly.
Learn to use the DK as it should be and there isn't a problem.
Besides, Necros are going to change immensely in the next couple of months. We all know it.
can u take a round on dk passives?
how you saying its fine?
I'm been playing mdk since launch never played any other class not just me saying that & I'm talk about mdk on pvp environment.
Well... PvP... that's a different kettle of fish.
I'm out. I don't PvP. I'm not a sadist or a masochist.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »DK is not the worst designed class IMO in terms of passives and buffs. Sorcs are in dead last since they overhauled the major/minor buff system.
The major/minor buff system is one of the most crucial things to discuss when talking balance between classes. Wardens and now Necromancers were designed after this system was implemented, so naturally they fit better into it.
Why?
DK is fine.
DK passive are really good. Helping Hands and Battle Roar are bad? lol
Worst of all? Let me guess. You didn't take a second of your time to read sorc, templar, or even nightblade passives?
Why?
DK is fine.
Basically you're asking for DK's to have the same as Wardens & Necros.
That's just silly.
Learn to use the DK as it should be and there isn't a problem.
Besides, Necros are going to change immensely in the next couple of months. We all know it.
Soul19reaper wrote: »Waiting for sorc thread
TheValar85 wrote: »You kidding me? XD worst troll thread ever.
DK is so OP and so over performing, and so on, so it is actualy perfectly designed.
DK passive are really good. Helping Hands and Battle Roar are bad? lol
“The classes passives are good, because 2 out of 12.” Really?
I can’t say this problem is unique to DKs, I know all 4 original classes have some lame ones. But DKs passives are especially bad in the damage dept. Specifically, ones that add duration are worthless. That duration needs to be added to the original skill and the passive replaced with something actually useful. And while they’re at it, stone fist has been useless for 5 years, let’s do something about that too.