Should we get more furnishing slots?
-
FierceSam✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Other (Explain)While clearly it would be ‘nice’ to have more slots, I have never hit the max number on larger spaces - like my swanky Psijiic Palace.
I can see that there is demand there and can see the potential for an ‘infinite craftbag’-like benefit for ESO+ subscribers to, say, treble rather than double their limits, so I have to conclude that extending this is so significantly difficult that ZOS isn’t prioritising it.
If it was easy it would clearly be a no brainer to do this and charge for it.
If I was ZOS I wouldn’t want users with low end systems to crash every time they visited their guildhall or their friends’ houses. There are enough things in the game that will crash your system without adding another one.
The challenge for housing enthusiasts is how to creatively manage the item cap when designing their houses. Sometimes limitations are also inspirations.0 -
srfrogg23✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Yes, I think there should be more space for furnishings.It wouldn't hurt my feelings to have more room for furniture.0 -
Grianasteri✭✭✭✭✭
✭Yes, I think there should be more space for furnishings.VaranisArano wrote: »The question is not "Should we get more housing slots?"
The question is "Can consoles handle more housing slots, and if they can't, will ZOS decide to add more anyway?"
Thr last time ZOS was asked before Summerset, they blamed console performance for why there werent additional housing slots.
This
They know we want more
They can not increase housing slots
It seems highly questionable that this is a legitimate reason. It seems far more likely there is another reason, which has little or nothing to do with ZOS not being able to add more slots.
Look at the size of the game and the amount of content and items in it. Entering our house is a separate instance.
At the very lease, as an ESO + customer, I expect to be able to furnish the huge house(s) available, including all the busts and monster trophies and all our pets and mounts.0