WrathOfInnos wrote: »Yes, do it. I’d prefer to keep the Spell Pen, but move it to the 3pc instead of the 4pc bonus (putting Spell Crit as the 4pc).
Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
WrathOfInnos wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
Magicka AY sounds very tempting. Maybe replacing the Destructive Mage set that nobody uses (also from HRC, so that would be fitting).
Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
The difference is 710 crit and 129wd/1487pen
Still pretty significant of a difference for stam since trap is already a pretty good dot.
Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
The difference is 710 crit and 129wd/1487pen
Still pretty significant of a difference for stam since trap is already a pretty good dot.
You mean, ay will do much more damage than tzogvin? because i can assure you it does not, the damage is close, it is in favor of ay, but not by much.
On stamblade pts i got 54 average on ay, and 53 on tzog.
That's because since you can now drop trap, you can use another skill in it's place, like rending, and keep it up 100% with no issues.
Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
The difference is 710 crit and 129wd/1487pen
Still pretty significant of a difference for stam since trap is already a pretty good dot.
You mean, ay will do much more damage than tzogvin? because i can assure you it does not, the damage is close, it is in favor of ay, but not by much.
On stamblade pts i got 54 average on ay, and 53 on tzog.
That's because since you can now drop trap, you can use another skill in it's place, like rending, and keep it up 100% with no issues.
Did you adjust your pen to account for the bonus?
I am loving tzogvin on my stamden and would love a mag version. It is not OP, not even BiS, but it is fun and easy to use, and I love having the extra slot to play around with. Great for slotting lotus or vigor. Skill slots are so limited in this game, any set that frees up a skill slot for you has at least some situational use.
I am loving tzogvin on my stamden and would love a mag version. It is not OP, not even BiS, but it is fun and easy to use, and I love having the extra slot to play around with. Great for slotting lotus or vigor. Skill slots are so limited in this game, any set that frees up a skill slot for you has at least some situational use.
it's not op, but definitely not far from bis, it's second close to ay, for frontbar ofc.
WrathOfInnos wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
Magicka AY sounds very tempting. Maybe replacing the Destructive Mage set that nobody uses (also from HRC, so that would be fitting).
Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
The difference is 710 crit and 129wd/1487pen
Still pretty significant of a difference for stam since trap is already a pretty good dot.
SaintSubwayy wrote: »magicka version of AY would also be nice tbh....
maybe even tied to meelerange, as a buff to meele magicka builds, which are still underperforming compared to ranged, and meele stambuilds.
magicka version of thogvinz also sounds neat, dunno if needed, since we already have acceleration...which in terms might become useless then
SaintSubwayy wrote: »magicka version of AY would also be nice tbh....
maybe even tied to meelerange, as a buff to meele magicka builds, which are still underperforming compared to ranged, and meele stambuilds.
magicka version of thogvinz also sounds neat, dunno if needed, since we already have acceleration...which in terms might become useless then
Why not both? People who want to use channeled/trap can use the AY equivalent and the rest can use the tzogvin thing. Everyone happy
No for real, twilight remedy should be useful enough to justify using it so healers get more options...
WrathOfInnos wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
Magicka AY sounds very tempting. Maybe replacing the Destructive Mage set that nobody uses (also from HRC, so that would be fitting).
I actually don't want AY equivalent, I'd rather have tzogvin since it would free up a bar slot for trap/channeled. Either that or make twilight remedy great... 10 seconds of force with a 20 second synergy cooldown is just pitiful, the duration should at least match the one from olorime.
WrathOfInnos wrote: »WrathOfInnos wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
Magicka AY sounds very tempting. Maybe replacing the Destructive Mage set that nobody uses (also from HRC, so that would be fitting).
I actually don't want AY equivalent, I'd rather have tzogvin since it would free up a bar slot for trap/channeled. Either that or make twilight remedy great... 10 seconds of force with a 20 second synergy cooldown is just pitiful, the duration should at least match the one from olorime.
@Masel Agreed Twilight Remedy could use a buff. I like the concept of that set, but it just isn’t enough to justify dropping a different healer set. If it was more like 30s, it would be comparable to Olorime in usefulness, and would likely replace Jorvulds in trials where there are mostly Magicka DPS.
That being said, I do already see better DPS results with Twilight Remedy than Channeled Acceleration. I think this is because casting Accel means skipping 2 Ele Weapon, 1 Light Attack, and 1/5 of a Spell Charge. On Nightblades it also mean giving up 1/5 of a bow proc and 1 Siphoning Attacks Resource Restore. That’s a pretty big list of sacrifices for the ~4% damage increase. Giving up none of those things, in exchange for 50% uptime is worth it. However in raids that uptime isn’t realistically 10/20s, it’s more like 10/30 or 10/40 so a duration increase would be very nice.
WrathOfInnos wrote: »WrathOfInnos wrote: »Oakmontowls_ESO wrote: »Interesting but you are losing 634 crit vs mother's sorrow and gaining an extra skill slot
On some mag class that extra skills slot will be worth it.
Keep in mind also, that this buff carry over to backbar, while sorrow does not.
They could also make an ay like magicka set, that would also be interesting.
The damage is extremely close, between tzogvin and ay, i bet it would be the same for mag.
But if they make an ay like set for mag, they should slightly increase the buff duration or it will fall off on some classes.
Infact, make both zos, i would sure use them.
Magicka AY sounds very tempting. Maybe replacing the Destructive Mage set that nobody uses (also from HRC, so that would be fitting).
I actually don't want AY equivalent, I'd rather have tzogvin since it would free up a bar slot for trap/channeled. Either that or make twilight remedy great... 10 seconds of force with a 20 second synergy cooldown is just pitiful, the duration should at least match the one from olorime.
@Masel Agreed Twilight Remedy could use a buff. I like the concept of that set, but it just isn’t enough to justify dropping a different healer set. If it was more like 30s, it would be comparable to Olorime in usefulness, and would likely replace Jorvulds in trials where there are mostly Magicka DPS.
That being said, I do already see better DPS results with Twilight Remedy than Channeled Acceleration. I think this is because casting Accel means skipping 2 Ele Weapon, 1 Light Attack, and 1/5 of a Spell Charge. On Nightblades it also mean giving up 1/5 of a bow proc and 1 Siphoning Attacks Resource Restore. That’s a pretty big list of sacrifices for the ~4% damage increase. Giving up none of those things, in exchange for 50% uptime is worth it. However in raids that uptime isn’t realistically 10/20s, it’s more like 10/30 or 10/40 so a duration increase would be very nice.
Yeah teh opportunity cost for channeled is quite high because you lose 2 GCDs,a dn even rearming trap loses you 1 GCD every 4 seconds.
On some magicka classes (such as a mag warden for example) i didnt find it worth slotting at all because there are skills with such high tooltips that castign an additonal one of thes eis gonna provide more than 4% overall. There are some trials that make it worth it though. in CR for example you can cast channeled in between her ports and wont lose anything really.