Dudes the problem is not the skill staying on someone for 1 or 5 seconds, the problem is that it hits like a FREAKING ULTIMATE,
I play Bgs since day one of morrowind and i`ve never seen the damage of this skill to thick for more than 1500-2000 damage
exaggeration, only glass cannons can achieve 3k total dark ticks on a full tank.
also, this is one of the only spells that make templar viable. And is not broken at all, compare it to any other ability, really. This is also dispellable even by breaking free.
Mrsinister2 wrote: »If your running volitile armour on a dk the damage return from that procs total dark so you take a ton of damage as a dk when total dark in on you.
InvictusApollo wrote: »Almost every templar build that I have seen on the Internet had this ability slotted. So I slotted it and used it. And it's useless un les you are a newbie who doesnt know that you can just CC break it.

And again, 2 templars in a team spam this ***, one is not even morphed yet.
By the time break free i get instant 10k damage just from those 2 skills... i play pvp for 3 years now, and have never had an issue against pple using this skill in bgs, because its damage was not that high and had time to react.
As a magblade, I want a total dark to place on Mr Flappy.
J/K, please overlook and carry on.
InvictusApollo wrote: »Almost every templar build that I have seen on the Internet had this ability slotted. So I slotted it and used it. And it's useless un les you are a newbie who doesnt know that you can just CC break it.
Seraphayel wrote: »As a magblade, I want a total dark to place on Mr Flappy.
J/K, please overlook and carry on.
This really sounds interesting, does this even work?
A DK with wings is struck with Eclipse. Now someone fires a projectile at the DK, it gets reflected and the DK gets damage from Eclipse?
Literally all you have to do is CC break or not attack when Total Dark is up. Learn the mechanics of the skill before making posts like this. Threads like this are what’s wrong with the forums.
That being said the skill is especially punitive towards DKs since volatile armor damage return is coded as direct damage. That should possibly be looked at and volatile be coded instead as a DoT. The issue in this scenario tho is the interaction between volatile and Total Dark, not the latter being OP. Timely CC breaks will still mitigate the damage.
Seraphayel wrote: »As a magblade, I want a total dark to place on Mr Flappy.
J/K, please overlook and carry on.
This really sounds interesting, does this even work?
A DK with wings is struck with Eclipse. Now someone fires a projectile at the DK, it gets reflected and the DK gets damage from Eclipse?
Bingo!
And again, 2 templars in a team spam this ***, one is not even morphed yet.
By the time break free i get instant 10k damage just from those 2 skills... i play pvp for 3 years now, and have never had an issue against pple using this skill in bgs, because its damage was not that high and had time to react.
you died to unstable core not total dark. First dmg was you hitting yourself, second was the AOE burst.
First dmg is higher (was buffed in clockwork city by 67% to account with a weird GCD mechanic).
CC break, reposition, heal. As Arya said, the DK armor is mistakenly procing the ability.
Toc de Malsvi wrote: »"Just CC break". LOL. You mean spam CC break while my character stands there doing nothing before dying in the inevitable burst combo?And again, 2 templars in a team spam this ***, one is not even morphed yet.
By the time break free i get instant 10k damage just from those 2 skills... i play pvp for 3 years now, and have never had an issue against pple using this skill in bgs, because its damage was not that high and had time to react.
you died to unstable core not total dark. First dmg was you hitting yourself, second was the AOE burst.
First dmg is higher (was buffed in clockwork city by 67% to account with a weird GCD mechanic).
CC break, reposition, heal. As Arya said, the DK armor is mistakenly procing the ability.
... Yes Arya was the first person to point that out in this thread...
But I guess the other two posts were just glossed over.