Only one truly Overpowered is Relenquen if you ask me, as it is a freaking proc. But as it is effective in just PvE mostly, no one bats an eye. The rest is fairly balanced and will come and go with the meta. With the Shadow change, I think TBS+Mother's Sorrow may beat Siroria+Spell Strategist on a Khajiit.
What the point of nerfing them when we all know ZOS will introduce even more OP trial sets with Elsweyr, rendering all the other sets obsolete?
codestripper wrote: »Just making this for community opinions...
Rele needs nerfing, I personally think Siroria is fine and gets better for more experienced players imo. In real fights and not dummy cheese.
If the same player ran each combo in a trial, I would expect them to have more Rele uptime than Siroria
John_Falstaff wrote: »@codestripper , didn't mean to offend or say it's intentionally biased, so not accusing or anything. Just it feels that the poll implies that they're overperforming by a large margin. But in reality, things are more complex than that. I won't take Relequen into Maelstrom or maybe even to vet Blackrose (I'll be losing stacks all the time - so I may put on something like VO + TFS, more so that tank won't be able to keep everything debuffed). If I don't have vMA bow, then Leviathan will turn out actually better than AY (because Leviathan gives mathematically almost identical stats, you don't have to keep up stacks, and unlike AY, there is a Leviathan bow in existence). I won't put on Spell Strategist into a trash fight where every squishy thing takes away my next four seconds of buff, leaving me worse than if I ran BSW/MS.
One issue with estimating performance of all those sets is that all comparisons are made either on a dummy or in stack-and-burn fights. And those particular sets perform very differently outside of optimal condition and with varying player skill.