Love the drama. Maybe just do away with the racials and replace them with only flavour, like the argonian swimming bonus they already have, nords get drunk from any drink or potion they use, wood elves get a bonus to stealing success chance etc..etc..
It's obviously hard enough to balance class/guild/weapon skills, let alone the added complication of various racial passives.
IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
But this is their philosophy, and my original point is that everyone seems to be unaware or willfully ignorant of it.
There is this.That's what I said, yes. I agree they aren't following their supposed philosophy as well as they should be, and I share your frustrations in that regard.
dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
So you're going to be ignorant of the facts. It's a nerf to some and huge buff for ZOS wallet. Many players have been playing the same toon for years, not because of META but because they actually RP as Altmer or Bosmer. A lot of PVE players as well play Altmer for the aesthetic and lore behind the passive. The way they continue to nerf and buff is around PVP which is only a small portion of their player base but is the loudest to cry.
@dcam86b14_ESO What are you talking about? Did you even read my post?
You're exhibiting the exact behaviour I was alluding to. You just jumped immediately to "I only care about how this affects me individually", rather than how these changes can affect the game and, by extension, the whole playerbase.
The new design philosophy is good. It's long overdue. If ZoS were handling it better, it would mean choosing your race isn't such a game changing decision at endgame; every race would be able to perform certain roles and bring their own unique twist to it.
That seems to be too big of a concept for a lot of people though, they only see the short term; the "I do 1% less dps now I quit the game" or, as you say, "this small statistic is the only thing retaining my sense of immersion and due to the change to it my suspension of disbelief has been completely shattered"
MLGProPlayer wrote: »IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
The race was very clearly underperforming in actual testing.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
The race was very clearly underperforming in actual testing.
LOL right.... you would have us believe Zen knowingly took an underperforming race and made it worse to either sell more race changes tokens or just to maliciously nerf the race, your reasoning is approaching that of parody.
No, it is obvious the race was overperforming which is basically what the Devs said. You really would have every believe instead they are lieing becuase you say so?
@Skwor is alluding to the 5 year over performance of certain races, including Altmer, that made them bis/meta to begin with.
ZOS is breaking the mold with these changes. Its not insidious, its a shake up and a good move for future proofing the product.
IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
The problem is after the first round of racial changes Altmer wasn't over performing. All magic classes were pretty close in DPS.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »@Skwor is alluding to the 5 year over performance of certain races, including Altmer, that made them bis/meta to begin with.
ZOS is breaking the mold with these changes. Its not insidious, its a shake up and a good move for future proofing the product.
It's a cash grab. They know that the majority of magicka DDs will need to race change all their characters now.
And that's not even mentioning how egregiously lore-breaking it is.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
The race was very clearly underperforming in actual testing.
LOL right.... you would have us believe Zen knowingly took an underperforming race and made it worse to either sell more race changes tokens or just to maliciously nerf the race, your reasoning is approaching that of parody.
No, it is obvious the race was overperforming which is basically what the Devs said. You really would have every believe instead they are lieing becuase you say so?
Show me tests where they are overperformibg.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
The race was very clearly underperforming in actual testing.
LOL right.... you would have us believe Zen knowingly took an underperforming race and made it worse to either sell more race changes tokens or just to maliciously nerf the race, your reasoning is approaching that of parody.
No, it is obvious the race was overperforming which is basically what the Devs said. You really would have every believe instead they are lieing becuase you say so?
Show me tests where they are overperformibg.
We have all seen the posts about tests and parses. I have seen no impartial accurate tests demonstesting the altmer underperforming as you claim. I chose to believe the developers who track internal metrics to determine the effectiveness of the racial changes. Thay have clearly stated they were overperforming.
Why don't you show me those internal tests where they are underperforming since you are the one claimijg they are lieing, yours is the extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary proof. I have chosen to accept their conclussion, as such you have the burden to prove them lieing. The burden is not mine to prove thier stated position as I have accepted it as it is. You are the one contesting the actual developers and thier integrity
@MLGProPlayerMLGProPlayer wrote: »dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
So you're going to be ignorant of the facts. It's a nerf to some and huge buff for ZOS wallet. Many players have been playing the same toon for years, not because of META but because they actually RP as Altmer or Bosmer. A lot of PVE players as well play Altmer for the aesthetic and lore behind the passive. The way they continue to nerf and buff is around PVP which is only a small portion of their player base but is the loudest to cry.
@dcam86b14_ESO What are you talking about? Did you even read my post?
You're exhibiting the exact behaviour I was alluding to. You just jumped immediately to "I only care about how this affects me individually", rather than how these changes can affect the game and, by extension, the whole playerbase.
The new design philosophy is good. It's long overdue. If ZoS were handling it better, it would mean choosing your race isn't such a game changing decision at endgame; every race would be able to perform certain roles and bring their own unique twist to it.
That seems to be too big of a concept for a lot of people though, they only see the short term; the "I do 1% less dps now I quit the game" or, as you say, "this small statistic is the only thing retaining my sense of immersion and due to the change to it my suspension of disbelief has been completely shattered"
The new design philsophy isn't good. They are explicitly targetting the current meta classes and knocking them out of the meta. They are not striving for balance.
Altmer were the second worst magicka DPS class before these nerfs, but the gap was very small. ZOS nerfed them specifically to widen the gap and force people to race change. This current "philosophy" is nothing more than a cash grab.
@MLGProPlayerMLGProPlayer wrote: »dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
So you're going to be ignorant of the facts. It's a nerf to some and huge buff for ZOS wallet. Many players have been playing the same toon for years, not because of META but because they actually RP as Altmer or Bosmer. A lot of PVE players as well play Altmer for the aesthetic and lore behind the passive. The way they continue to nerf and buff is around PVP which is only a small portion of their player base but is the loudest to cry.
@dcam86b14_ESO What are you talking about? Did you even read my post?
You're exhibiting the exact behaviour I was alluding to. You just jumped immediately to "I only care about how this affects me individually", rather than how these changes can affect the game and, by extension, the whole playerbase.
The new design philosophy is good. It's long overdue. If ZoS were handling it better, it would mean choosing your race isn't such a game changing decision at endgame; every race would be able to perform certain roles and bring their own unique twist to it.
That seems to be too big of a concept for a lot of people though, they only see the short term; the "I do 1% less dps now I quit the game" or, as you say, "this small statistic is the only thing retaining my sense of immersion and due to the change to it my suspension of disbelief has been completely shattered"
The new design philsophy isn't good. They are explicitly targetting the current meta classes and knocking them out of the meta. They are not striving for balance.
Altmer were the second worst magicka DPS class before these nerfs, but the gap was very small. ZOS nerfed them specifically to widen the gap and force people to race change. This current "philosophy" is nothing more than a cash grab.
You see what I mean? You're just focusing on how Altmer are going to have lower dps with these changes, not the bigger picture for what the changes are supposed to mean. You're creating this conspiracy in your head that ZOS wants to sell race change tokens to justify this victimization you've conjured up.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
The race was very clearly underperforming in actual testing.
LOL right.... you would have us believe Zen knowingly took an underperforming race and made it worse to either sell more race changes tokens or just to maliciously nerf the race, your reasoning is approaching that of parody.
No, it is obvious the race was overperforming which is basically what the Devs said. You really would have every believe instead they are lieing becuase you say so?
Show me tests where they are overperformibg.
We have all seen the posts about tests and parses. I have seen no impartial accurate tests demonstesting the altmer underperforming as you claim. I chose to believe the developers who track internal metrics to determine the effectiveness of the racial changes. Thay have clearly stated they were overperforming.
Why don't you show me those internal tests where they are underperforming since you are the one claimijg they are lieing, yours is the extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary proof. I have chosen to accept their conclussion, as such you have the burden to prove them lieing. The burden is not mine to prove thier stated position as I have accepted it as it is. You are the one contesting the actual developers and thier integrity
The developers have literally said they cannot replicate the parses of the top players.
@MLGProPlayerMLGProPlayer wrote: »dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
So you're going to be ignorant of the facts. It's a nerf to some and huge buff for ZOS wallet. Many players have been playing the same toon for years, not because of META but because they actually RP as Altmer or Bosmer. A lot of PVE players as well play Altmer for the aesthetic and lore behind the passive. The way they continue to nerf and buff is around PVP which is only a small portion of their player base but is the loudest to cry.
@dcam86b14_ESO What are you talking about? Did you even read my post?
You're exhibiting the exact behaviour I was alluding to. You just jumped immediately to "I only care about how this affects me individually", rather than how these changes can affect the game and, by extension, the whole playerbase.
The new design philosophy is good. It's long overdue. If ZoS were handling it better, it would mean choosing your race isn't such a game changing decision at endgame; every race would be able to perform certain roles and bring their own unique twist to it.
That seems to be too big of a concept for a lot of people though, they only see the short term; the "I do 1% less dps now I quit the game" or, as you say, "this small statistic is the only thing retaining my sense of immersion and due to the change to it my suspension of disbelief has been completely shattered"
The new design philsophy isn't good. They are explicitly targetting the current meta classes and knocking them out of the meta. They are not striving for balance.
Altmer were the second worst magicka DPS class before these nerfs, but the gap was very small. ZOS nerfed them specifically to widen the gap and force people to race change. This current "philosophy" is nothing more than a cash grab.
You see what I mean? You're just focusing on how Altmer are going to have lower dps with these changes, not the bigger picture for what the changes are supposed to mean. You're creating this conspiracy in your head that ZOS wants to sell race change tokens to justify this victimization you've conjured up.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
The race was very clearly underperforming in actual testing.
LOL right.... you would have us believe Zen knowingly took an underperforming race and made it worse to either sell more race changes tokens or just to maliciously nerf the race, your reasoning is approaching that of parody.
No, it is obvious the race was overperforming which is basically what the Devs said. You really would have every believe instead they are lieing becuase you say so?
Show me tests where they are overperformibg.
We have all seen the posts about tests and parses. I have seen no impartial accurate tests demonstesting the altmer underperforming as you claim. I chose to believe the developers who track internal metrics to determine the effectiveness of the racial changes. Thay have clearly stated they were overperforming.
Why don't you show me those internal tests where they are underperforming since you are the one claimijg they are lieing, yours is the extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary proof. I have chosen to accept their conclussion, as such you have the burden to prove them lieing. The burden is not mine to prove thier stated position as I have accepted it as it is. You are the one contesting the actual developers and thier integrity
The developers have literally said they cannot replicate the parses of the top players.
Again with the top players. Who cares about the top players performance, that is the very definition of making a rule for the exception. Rules or balance based around the exception is utter folly, it leaves everyone else broken. It is a fools quest to balance the game around the top .05%, that is not balance that is elitism, everyone else is by definition unbalanced.
What they can do is evaluate performance against the standard model and that is what they do, that model shows from their own statement the race is overperforming. They never said nor should they ever balance the races for .05% of the population.
Have you ever seen a driver license require someone to have the skills of a racecar driver to obtain? Ever wonder why they don't? Wouldn't that be safer and ensure everyone is the best driver they should be? By your logic here that is what you are asking Zen to do with this game.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
The race was very clearly underperforming in actual testing.
LOL right.... you would have us believe Zen knowingly took an underperforming race and made it worse to either sell more race changes tokens or just to maliciously nerf the race, your reasoning is approaching that of parody.
No, it is obvious the race was overperforming which is basically what the Devs said. You really would have every believe instead they are lieing becuase you say so?
Show me tests where they are overperformibg.
We have all seen the posts about tests and parses. I have seen no impartial accurate tests demonstesting the altmer underperforming as you claim. I chose to believe the developers who track internal metrics to determine the effectiveness of the racial changes. Thay have clearly stated they were overperforming.
Why don't you show me those internal tests where they are underperforming since you are the one claimijg they are lieing, yours is the extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary proof. I have chosen to accept their conclussion, as such you have the burden to prove them lieing. The burden is not mine to prove thier stated position as I have accepted it as it is. You are the one contesting the actual developers and thier integrity
The developers have literally said they cannot replicate the parses of the top players.
Again with the top players. Who cares about the top players performance, that is the very definition of making a rule for the exception. Rules or balance based around the exception is utter folly, it leaves everyone else broken. It is a fools quest to balance the game around the top .05%, that is not balance that is elitism, everyone else is by definition unbalanced.
What they can do is evaluate performance against the standard model and that is what they do, that model shows from their own statement the race is overperforming. They never said nor should they ever balance the races for .05% of the population.
Have you ever seen a driver license require someone to have the skills of a racecar driver to obtain? Ever wonder why they don't? Wouldn't that be safer and ensure everyone is the best driver they should be? By your logic here that is what you are asking Zen to do with this game.
All game developers balance ariund the highest skill level because changes trickle down. It's literally game development 101. This is why ZOS started the class rep program. It's why they will be inviting them to the studio to test the necro class.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »IzzyStardust wrote: »Illuvatarr wrote: »I think people are over reacting. Look at the Altmer racial passives/abilities. Change your gear up accordingly to accommodate the change. Altmer should still be top dps with right gear combination. You can’t compare it to other races in same gear sets as the racials pretty clearly point out which gear sets to use.
Whatever - they just gave altmer stam regen.
Unbelievable.
It was decided to make it a minor utility buff instead of just removing the original buff all together. This was done due to the race overperforming. How people miss this was a good thing is beyond me.
The race was very clearly underperforming in actual testing.
LOL right.... you would have us believe Zen knowingly took an underperforming race and made it worse to either sell more race changes tokens or just to maliciously nerf the race, your reasoning is approaching that of parody.
No, it is obvious the race was overperforming which is basically what the Devs said. You really would have every believe instead they are lieing becuase you say so?
Show me tests where they are overperformibg.
We have all seen the posts about tests and parses. I have seen no impartial accurate tests demonstesting the altmer underperforming as you claim. I chose to believe the developers who track internal metrics to determine the effectiveness of the racial changes. Thay have clearly stated they were overperforming.
Why don't you show me those internal tests where they are underperforming since you are the one claimijg they are lieing, yours is the extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary proof. I have chosen to accept their conclussion, as such you have the burden to prove them lieing. The burden is not mine to prove thier stated position as I have accepted it as it is. You are the one contesting the actual developers and thier integrity
The developers have literally said they cannot replicate the parses of the top players.
Again with the top players. Who cares about the top players performance, that is the very definition of making a rule for the exception. Rules or balance based around the exception is utter folly, it leaves everyone else broken. It is a fools quest to balance the game around the top .05%, that is not balance that is elitism, everyone else is by definition unbalanced.
What they can do is evaluate performance against the standard model and that is what they do, that model shows from their own statement the race is overperforming. They never said nor should they ever balance the races for .05% of the population.
Have you ever seen a driver license require someone to have the skills of a racecar driver to obtain? Ever wonder why they don't? Wouldn't that be safer and ensure everyone is the best driver they should be? By your logic here that is what you are asking Zen to do with this game.
All game developers balance ariund the highest skill level because changes trickle down. It's literally game development 101. This is why ZOS started the class rep program. It's why they will be inviting them to the studio to test the necro class.
You really have no idea what you are talking about. IMO you have reached the point were you will spew anything just to see what gets traction.
Please do show me in the game developers handbook 101 where it states thatOh BTW before you spout such garbage you might want to know something about the people you throw random statements at, they actually MAY know something about what you try to state as fact.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »@MLGProPlayerMLGProPlayer wrote: »dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
So you're going to be ignorant of the facts. It's a nerf to some and huge buff for ZOS wallet. Many players have been playing the same toon for years, not because of META but because they actually RP as Altmer or Bosmer. A lot of PVE players as well play Altmer for the aesthetic and lore behind the passive. The way they continue to nerf and buff is around PVP which is only a small portion of their player base but is the loudest to cry.
@dcam86b14_ESO What are you talking about? Did you even read my post?
You're exhibiting the exact behaviour I was alluding to. You just jumped immediately to "I only care about how this affects me individually", rather than how these changes can affect the game and, by extension, the whole playerbase.
The new design philosophy is good. It's long overdue. If ZoS were handling it better, it would mean choosing your race isn't such a game changing decision at endgame; every race would be able to perform certain roles and bring their own unique twist to it.
That seems to be too big of a concept for a lot of people though, they only see the short term; the "I do 1% less dps now I quit the game" or, as you say, "this small statistic is the only thing retaining my sense of immersion and due to the change to it my suspension of disbelief has been completely shattered"
The new design philsophy isn't good. They are explicitly targetting the current meta classes and knocking them out of the meta. They are not striving for balance.
Altmer were the second worst magicka DPS class before these nerfs, but the gap was very small. ZOS nerfed them specifically to widen the gap and force people to race change. This current "philosophy" is nothing more than a cash grab.
You see what I mean? You're just focusing on how Altmer are going to have lower dps with these changes, not the bigger picture for what the changes are supposed to mean. You're creating this conspiracy in your head that ZOS wants to sell race change tokens to justify this victimization you've conjured up.
It's not a conspiracy if it's true.
The current meta races (which should be at the top according to the lore too) were nerfed to no longer be in the meta, thereby forcing the majority of endgame players to race change.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »@MLGProPlayerMLGProPlayer wrote: »dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
So you're going to be ignorant of the facts. It's a nerf to some and huge buff for ZOS wallet. Many players have been playing the same toon for years, not because of META but because they actually RP as Altmer or Bosmer. A lot of PVE players as well play Altmer for the aesthetic and lore behind the passive. The way they continue to nerf and buff is around PVP which is only a small portion of their player base but is the loudest to cry.
@dcam86b14_ESO What are you talking about? Did you even read my post?
You're exhibiting the exact behaviour I was alluding to. You just jumped immediately to "I only care about how this affects me individually", rather than how these changes can affect the game and, by extension, the whole playerbase.
The new design philosophy is good. It's long overdue. If ZoS were handling it better, it would mean choosing your race isn't such a game changing decision at endgame; every race would be able to perform certain roles and bring their own unique twist to it.
That seems to be too big of a concept for a lot of people though, they only see the short term; the "I do 1% less dps now I quit the game" or, as you say, "this small statistic is the only thing retaining my sense of immersion and due to the change to it my suspension of disbelief has been completely shattered"
The new design philsophy isn't good. They are explicitly targetting the current meta classes and knocking them out of the meta. They are not striving for balance.
Altmer were the second worst magicka DPS class before these nerfs, but the gap was very small. ZOS nerfed them specifically to widen the gap and force people to race change. This current "philosophy" is nothing more than a cash grab.
You see what I mean? You're just focusing on how Altmer are going to have lower dps with these changes, not the bigger picture for what the changes are supposed to mean. You're creating this conspiracy in your head that ZOS wants to sell race change tokens to justify this victimization you've conjured up.
It's not a conspiracy if it's true.
The current meta races (which should be at the top according to the lore too) were nerfed to no longer be in the meta, thereby forcing the majority of endgame players to race change.
Even if we were to assume your statement of the change being a nerf to be true you are saying a correlation proves the effect. That you are not aware of the fallacy here and seem to be in complete ignorance of the failure in the logic says a lot.
So in your world the refrigerator light must be on when the door is closed because every time the door is open you see the refrigerator light on.. WOW!
MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »@MLGProPlayerMLGProPlayer wrote: »dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
So you're going to be ignorant of the facts. It's a nerf to some and huge buff for ZOS wallet. Many players have been playing the same toon for years, not because of META but because they actually RP as Altmer or Bosmer. A lot of PVE players as well play Altmer for the aesthetic and lore behind the passive. The way they continue to nerf and buff is around PVP which is only a small portion of their player base but is the loudest to cry.
@dcam86b14_ESO What are you talking about? Did you even read my post?
You're exhibiting the exact behaviour I was alluding to. You just jumped immediately to "I only care about how this affects me individually", rather than how these changes can affect the game and, by extension, the whole playerbase.
The new design philosophy is good. It's long overdue. If ZoS were handling it better, it would mean choosing your race isn't such a game changing decision at endgame; every race would be able to perform certain roles and bring their own unique twist to it.
That seems to be too big of a concept for a lot of people though, they only see the short term; the "I do 1% less dps now I quit the game" or, as you say, "this small statistic is the only thing retaining my sense of immersion and due to the change to it my suspension of disbelief has been completely shattered"
The new design philsophy isn't good. They are explicitly targetting the current meta classes and knocking them out of the meta. They are not striving for balance.
Altmer were the second worst magicka DPS class before these nerfs, but the gap was very small. ZOS nerfed them specifically to widen the gap and force people to race change. This current "philosophy" is nothing more than a cash grab.
You see what I mean? You're just focusing on how Altmer are going to have lower dps with these changes, not the bigger picture for what the changes are supposed to mean. You're creating this conspiracy in your head that ZOS wants to sell race change tokens to justify this victimization you've conjured up.
It's not a conspiracy if it's true.
The current meta races (which should be at the top according to the lore too) were nerfed to no longer be in the meta, thereby forcing the majority of endgame players to race change.
Even if we were to assume your statement of the change being a nerf to be true you are saying a correlation proves the effect. That you are not aware of the fallacy here and seem to be in complete ignorance of the failure in the logic says a lot.
So in your world the refrigerator light must be on when the door is closed because every time the door is open you see the refrigerator light on.. WOW!
Test data proves I am correct. Until you provide me with data to the contrary, I will remain right.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »@MLGProPlayerMLGProPlayer wrote: »dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
So you're going to be ignorant of the facts. It's a nerf to some and huge buff for ZOS wallet. Many players have been playing the same toon for years, not because of META but because they actually RP as Altmer or Bosmer. A lot of PVE players as well play Altmer for the aesthetic and lore behind the passive. The way they continue to nerf and buff is around PVP which is only a small portion of their player base but is the loudest to cry.
@dcam86b14_ESO What are you talking about? Did you even read my post?
You're exhibiting the exact behaviour I was alluding to. You just jumped immediately to "I only care about how this affects me individually", rather than how these changes can affect the game and, by extension, the whole playerbase.
The new design philosophy is good. It's long overdue. If ZoS were handling it better, it would mean choosing your race isn't such a game changing decision at endgame; every race would be able to perform certain roles and bring their own unique twist to it.
That seems to be too big of a concept for a lot of people though, they only see the short term; the "I do 1% less dps now I quit the game" or, as you say, "this small statistic is the only thing retaining my sense of immersion and due to the change to it my suspension of disbelief has been completely shattered"
The new design philsophy isn't good. They are explicitly targetting the current meta classes and knocking them out of the meta. They are not striving for balance.
Altmer were the second worst magicka DPS class before these nerfs, but the gap was very small. ZOS nerfed them specifically to widen the gap and force people to race change. This current "philosophy" is nothing more than a cash grab.
You see what I mean? You're just focusing on how Altmer are going to have lower dps with these changes, not the bigger picture for what the changes are supposed to mean. You're creating this conspiracy in your head that ZOS wants to sell race change tokens to justify this victimization you've conjured up.
It's not a conspiracy if it's true.
The current meta races (which should be at the top according to the lore too) were nerfed to no longer be in the meta, thereby forcing the majority of endgame players to race change.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »@MLGProPlayerMLGProPlayer wrote: »dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »let's make something clear; and I think it's something people don't realise or don't want to realise.
The purpose of these changes isn't to "nerf" or "buff", it's to fundementally change what choosing your race means for you as a player in the first place. Currently, there are defined "best" races for certain roles, ZoS wants to change that, or at least mitigate it. I agree with this philosophy; it's something long overdue in this cancerous meta we find ourselves in this game. unfortunately, I don't think they're implementing this philosophy as well as they could be, but that's a whole other conversation.
Anyway, stop this. Stop this mentality of "this is being nerfed" or "now X is the best thing for X", it's not the point of these changes. Or it's not supposed to be, anyway.
So you're going to be ignorant of the facts. It's a nerf to some and huge buff for ZOS wallet. Many players have been playing the same toon for years, not because of META but because they actually RP as Altmer or Bosmer. A lot of PVE players as well play Altmer for the aesthetic and lore behind the passive. The way they continue to nerf and buff is around PVP which is only a small portion of their player base but is the loudest to cry.
@dcam86b14_ESO What are you talking about? Did you even read my post?
You're exhibiting the exact behaviour I was alluding to. You just jumped immediately to "I only care about how this affects me individually", rather than how these changes can affect the game and, by extension, the whole playerbase.
The new design philosophy is good. It's long overdue. If ZoS were handling it better, it would mean choosing your race isn't such a game changing decision at endgame; every race would be able to perform certain roles and bring their own unique twist to it.
That seems to be too big of a concept for a lot of people though, they only see the short term; the "I do 1% less dps now I quit the game" or, as you say, "this small statistic is the only thing retaining my sense of immersion and due to the change to it my suspension of disbelief has been completely shattered"
The new design philsophy isn't good. They are explicitly targetting the current meta classes and knocking them out of the meta. They are not striving for balance.
Altmer were the second worst magicka DPS class before these nerfs, but the gap was very small. ZOS nerfed them specifically to widen the gap and force people to race change. This current "philosophy" is nothing more than a cash grab.
You see what I mean? You're just focusing on how Altmer are going to have lower dps with these changes, not the bigger picture for what the changes are supposed to mean. You're creating this conspiracy in your head that ZOS wants to sell race change tokens to justify this victimization you've conjured up.
It's not a conspiracy if it's true.
The current meta races (which should be at the top according to the lore too) were nerfed to no longer be in the meta, thereby forcing the majority of endgame players to race change.
Even if we were to assume your statement of the change being a nerf to be true you are saying a correlation proves the effect. That you are not aware of the fallacy here and seem to be in complete ignorance of the failure in the logic says a lot.
So in your world the refrigerator light must be on when the door is closed because every time the door is open you see the refrigerator light on.. WOW!
Test data proves I am correct. Until you provide me with data to the contrary, I will remain right.
Let me gets this straight, your personal or I guess some other player's personal test data is to be trusted over the developers tools and internal data.. yep keep running with that, it is a sure winner
You do know the Developers actually, ya know ..developed this game. They might actually know better and have better data than some random player's attempt to parse data regardless of that player's sincerity?
All your posts requires people to believe Zen is not telling the truth and you know better than them.. That is not a very tenable position without some pretty solid evidence.