@kathandira your link doesn’t work
@redspecter23 yeah the problem is 7% isn’t going to shine in anywhere. It’s completely negligible. It’ takes you 14 attacks for its value to show of getting you a free ability. That’s stupid. If they want to make thier damage mediocre and excel in sustain. It should be closer to 20% where you may get a extra attack after 4-5 abilities. That would make sustustain actually noticable
kathandira wrote: »Please take this conversation to https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/453551/upcoming-racial-balance-changes-for-update-21#latest
We don't need the entire General Sub Forum to be filled with this topic.
@Irylia my problem is. It does offer anything substanstial. If you have to cast a spell 14 times to get the value of one free spell. I wouldn’t call that sustain
redspecter23 wrote: »@redspecter23 yeah the problem is 7% isn’t going to shine in anywhere. It’s completely negligible. It’ takes you 14 attacks for its value to show of getting you a free ability. That’s stupid. If they want to make thier damage mediocre and excel in sustain. It should be closer to 20% where you may get a extra attack after 4-5 abilities. That would make sustustain actually noticable
Well 7% of a 3000 magicka spell is 210. That's 210 magicka saved every 1 second using global cooldowns and that equates to 410 effective regen in a heavy combat situation. That sounds like the exact opposite of negligible to me, unless you think that over 400 regen is nothing.
kathandira wrote: »Please take this conversation to https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/453551/upcoming-racial-balance-changes-for-update-21#latest
We don't need the entire General Sub Forum to be filled with this topic.
@Skwor between a big magicka pool and heavy attack weaves. No. Magicka has hardly a issue for me.
7% is noticable at all. Say a spell. Is 3000. That’s only only saving 210. It takes 14 more casts of the spell just to get enough to use it again. You aren’t going to feel that in the slightest. There’s nothing powerful about that.
redspecter23 wrote: »@redspecter23 yeah the problem is 7% isn’t going to shine in anywhere. It’s completely negligible. It’ takes you 14 attacks for its value to show of getting you a free ability. That’s stupid. If they want to make thier damage mediocre and excel in sustain. It should be closer to 20% where you may get a extra attack after 4-5 abilities. That would make sustustain actually noticable
Well 7% of a 3000 magicka spell is 210. That's 210 magicka saved every 1 second using global cooldowns and that equates to 410 effective regen in a heavy combat situation. That sounds like the exact opposite of negligible to me, unless you think that over 400 regen is nothing.
Look at it how ever you like, but It takes 14 casts of a spell to get its value. That is absolutely garbage for a passive. I find that hard to call sustain
redspecter23 wrote: »@redspecter23 yeah the problem is 7% isn’t going to shine in anywhere. It’s completely negligible. It’ takes you 14 attacks for its value to show of getting you a free ability. That’s stupid. If they want to make thier damage mediocre and excel in sustain. It should be closer to 20% where you may get a extra attack after 4-5 abilities. That would make sustustain actually noticable
Well 7% of a 3000 magicka spell is 210. That's 210 magicka saved every 1 second using global cooldowns and that equates to 410 effective regen in a heavy combat situation. That sounds like the exact opposite of negligible to me, unless you think that over 400 regen is nothing.
Look at it how ever you like, but It takes 14 casts of a spell to get its value. That is absolutely garbage for a passive. I find that hard to call sustain
So that's a minimum of 14 seconds (assuming you fire any magicka costing ability on gcd) to get back 3000 mag, where as the high elf spell charge passive will take >21 seconds (firing class skills) to get back the same amount of mag.
That 7% is not to be sniffed at, and certainly not garbage.
I agree the current sustain tools bretons get are a bit overkill. 7% cost reduction already is huge. I'd keep the huge spell resistance with it rather than medium resistance passive and more sustain on top of my sustain.
@Skwor between a big magicka pool and heavy attack weaves. No. Magicka has hardly a issue for me.
7% is noticable at all. Say a spell. Is 3000. That’s only only saving 210. It takes 14 more casts of the spell just to get enough to use it again. You aren’t going to feel that in the slightest. There’s nothing powerful about that.
redspecter23 wrote: »@redspecter23 yeah the problem is 7% isn’t going to shine in anywhere. It’s completely negligible. It’ takes you 14 attacks for its value to show of getting you a free ability. That’s stupid. If they want to make thier damage mediocre and excel in sustain. It should be closer to 20% where you may get a extra attack after 4-5 abilities. That would make sustustain actually noticable
Well 7% of a 3000 magicka spell is 210. That's 210 magicka saved every 1 second using global cooldowns and that equates to 410 effective regen in a heavy combat situation. That sounds like the exact opposite of negligible to me, unless you think that over 400 regen is nothing.
Look at it how ever you like, but It takes 14 casts of a spell to get its value. That is absolutely garbage for a passive. I find that hard to call sustain
rafaelcsmaia wrote: »I might be wrong here but I believe the 7% reduction is applied on the base cost of the skill, before applying light armor passives. If this is true, 7% more reduction is very powerful, no regen can match it on spamming situations.