Rinlan_Darius wrote: »Prices for purple and gold ingredients to upgrade jewelry fell in the trade guilds at least 20% (PS4 EU). I think this is the result of bots.
Elwendryll wrote: »Rinlan_Darius wrote: »Prices for purple and gold ingredients to upgrade jewelry fell in the trade guilds at least 20% (PS4 EU). I think this is the result of bots.
Or you know... Prices fell because the demand is lower now that every end game player golded everything, and the supply is higher...
I believe the position would be that ZOS is not cool with it, based on what's contained in the Terms of Service and Code of Conduct (links at the bottom of page). I don't know about that second part but a bot isn't going to accept a group request. Do you still get loot in the overland if you heal someone but don't deal damage? Hmm. *shrug*Not a "bot" issue per se, but:
Does ZoS have a position on multi-boxing? Over the weekend, I saw a lot of what must be multi-boxers running around killing mobs with "groups" of toons consisting very obviously of a directly controlled toon and several other toons slaved to it.
Also, if I were to follow such a group and heal-tag it, would I get to loot the corpses? Not saying I would spend my time that way, just asking . . .
Not a "bot" issue per se, but:
Does ZoS have a position on multi-boxing? Over the weekend, I saw a lot of what must be multi-boxers running around killing mobs with "groups" of toons consisting very obviously of a directly controlled toon and several other toons slaved to it.
Also, if I were to follow such a group and heal-tag it, would I get to loot the corpses? Not saying I would spend my time that way, just asking . . .
"Third party tools, the use of "bots", "speed hacks", "deep-link", "page-scrape", "robot", "spider", algorithms or other programs that copy or monitor any part of the Services (including, but not limited to, the Game(s) and/or forums), software that transmits, manipulates, or distributes (including, but are limited to, "mirroring") the data stream or any aspect of the Services to another computer, server websites or other publication or distribution media, or software that permits You to use Services without human input are examples of methods not authorized by ZeniMax." - Terms of Service, the only truth that matters.Salvas_Aren wrote: »I've heard so many rumors about bots, no clue what is true.
Bots are good, bots are evil, bots pay for ESO+, bots reduce the risk of major hacks and account theft, bots are the result of account theft, bots clear drug money, bots get banned, bots get not banned, Zeni does not care, Zeni has no idea what to do ...
Pick the truth you like the most.
Rinlan_Darius wrote: »For examplehttps://youtube.com/watch?v=DZlFNmVwUfk
Rinlan_Darius wrote: »Like this farming ore https://youtube.com/watch?v=RV7wDYxCDqY
DirkRavenclaw wrote: »Rinlan_Darius wrote: »Like this farming ore https://youtube.com/watch?v=RV7wDYxCDqY
This wasnt necesarrily a Bot. As i commented on the Video, this Character was looking at the Map or into the Inventory. It was no Duel Invite send or tried to talk to the Player. I sometimes need a few more on me, i stay for 20 or 30 mins at a spawnpoint around, sometimes even with my Sorc. Doesnt make me a Bot.
DeathStalker_X wrote: »IMHO, ZOS is simply stupid in not banning bots - they ruin things for everyone. It's not THAT hard to code against it.
DeathStalker_X wrote: »IMHO, ZOS is simply stupid in not banning bots - they ruin things for everyone. It's not THAT hard to code against it.
Yes it is, it's extremely difficult, very labor-intensive, and to this day generally ineffective. Any anti-botting technique and associated algorithms would require a team of developers to implement and maintain and continuously update and that's really not very practical. Plus, the botters will find a workaround anyway for any current implementation of anti-botting methods. There are some new studies which are still ongoing that are attempting to find more practical and hopefully effective techniques but as of right now whatever technique ZOS is using, if any, is probably as good as it's going to get.