How does run of the mill *** Customer Support constitute Harassment?
So they worked with to try and fix your problem. The nerve of some companies.
All they had to do is so "NO we won't help you" but nooo. They had to go the extra mile and make accusations.
All they had to do is so "NO we won't help you" but nooo. They had to go the extra mile and make accusations.
Yea they really name dropping you mate smh... they tried to help you. If you really believe any CS would say that then you have some different expectations than most people... either way best of luck getting it fixed.
Edit: Also, CS asking you to perform basic Troubleshooting is not harassment and is an insult to people who have suffered from real harassment to say it is.
Yes i'm sure the customer support agent has planned this to extract an emotional response, might as well risk their job in order to troll you right? come on bud be realistic
VaranisArano wrote: »If you want a response, I'd suggest posting your Ticket number here, that way any ZOS rep who pops by here can actually track down your ticket history.
VaranisArano wrote: »If you want a response, I'd suggest posting your Ticket number here, that way any ZOS rep who pops by here can actually track down your ticket history.
would i be violating any terms by posting it publicly?
VaranisArano wrote: »If you want a response, I'd suggest posting your Ticket number here, that way any ZOS rep who pops by here can actually track down your ticket history.
would i be violating any terms by posting it publicly?
VaranisArano wrote: »If you want a response, I'd suggest posting your Ticket number here, that way any ZOS rep who pops by here can actually track down your ticket history.
would i be violating any terms by posting it publicly?
How does run of the mill *** Customer Support constitute Harassment?
I was instructed over and over and over with different troubleshooting methods, then they state that the voice chat glitch- its problems crashing the client was my fault. They 1) got me to do a task with the knowledge knowing that the methods prescribed would not work. 2) Tried to arouse a reaction. In layman's terms they were trolling and now its preventing me from having not only this issues but other issues resolved.
Yes i'm sure the customer support agent has planned this to extract an emotional response, might as well risk their job in order to troll you right? come on bud be realistic
All I am looking for is an agent to challenge my claim exactly as you are. Then I'll be happy. I am willing to let the documentation do the talking.
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »How does run of the mill *** Customer Support constitute Harassment?
I was instructed over and over and over with different troubleshooting methods, then they state that the voice chat glitch- its problems crashing the client was my fault. They 1) got me to do a task with the knowledge knowing that the methods prescribed would not work. 2) Tried to arouse a reaction. In layman's terms they were trolling and now its preventing me from having not only this issues but other issues resolved.
Typical customer statement when asking for support: "Fix your game!"
Typical support statement when customer is on the line: "This is not a common issue so we must troubleshoot and narrow down likely causes."
Typical customer reaction to resolution: "So you're blaming me?! It's your game that's the problem!"
Typical support reaction and de-escalation technique: "No sir/ma'am. It's the voice chat system you are using, not you specifically."
Typical next customer reaction: "That implies it is my fault for using that program and that makes me dumb."
Typical next support reaction: "No, I did not say that. It's just not something we have control over and can help you with as it is the voice chat that is the cause and the only idea we have is to try not using that system."
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
....until customer, who never accepts or likes the answer, finally decides to go to the public and thinks public perception will solve the problem that support can't or just because they want to be vindictive.
Customer service reps are required, and only stay at their jobs if they are decent at it, to remain professional and courteous and are trained in ways to say things that do not place the blame on the customer, even if the customer truly is to blame and even says they are. If a customer says "I'm sorry to waste your time with my screw-up" then the customer service rep is likely to say "no it's ok; it happens all the time and isn't your fault".
This is just typical when people are angry and can't find an answer that they like. They avoid even doing a guaranteed solution and instead complain to the public as if that will help; it doesn't.
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »How does run of the mill *** Customer Support constitute Harassment?
I was instructed over and over and over with different troubleshooting methods, then they state that the voice chat glitch- its problems crashing the client was my fault. They 1) got me to do a task with the knowledge knowing that the methods prescribed would not work. 2) Tried to arouse a reaction. In layman's terms they were trolling and now its preventing me from having not only this issues but other issues resolved.
Typical customer statement when asking for support: "Fix your game!"
Typical support statement when customer is on the line: "This is not a common issue so we must troubleshoot and narrow down likely causes."
Typical customer reaction to resolution: "So you're blaming me?! It's your game that's the problem!"
Typical support reaction and de-escalation technique: "No sir/ma'am. It's the voice chat system you are using, not you specifically."
Typical next customer reaction: "That implies it is my fault for using that program and that makes me dumb."
Typical next support reaction: "No, I did not say that. It's just not something we have control over and can help you with as it is the voice chat that is the cause and the only idea we have is to try not using that system."
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
...repeat last 2 steps
....until customer, who never accepts or likes the answer, finally decides to go to the public and thinks public perception will solve the problem that support can't or just because they want to be vindictive.
Customer service reps are required, and only stay at their jobs if they are decent at it, to remain professional and courteous and are trained in ways to say things that do not place the blame on the customer, even if the customer truly is to blame and even says they are. If a customer says "I'm sorry to waste your time with my screw-up" then the customer service rep is likely to say "no it's ok; it happens all the time and isn't your fault".
This is just typical when people are angry and can't find an answer that they like. They avoid even doing a guaranteed solution and instead complain to the public as if that will help; it doesn't.
Please read the updated post also, that's not how things went down. Again , I posted the ticket number if any other agents want to look at it, it would be great.
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »FYI, I believe none of us can see the ticket data. Only you and the support people can.
You can copy paste here all you want, but we would never be able to tell if that was fact or photoshop.
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »
1) They are paid by the hour and judged based on reducing the amount of time per customer to reduce the amount of cost in more reps and opportunity cost of helping more customers and keeping ticket response time down.
They would not waste your time because that wastes their time which is micro-managed to the point of being grounds for termination of employment.
2) You wanted help so they tried to take the necessary time to actually help.
Your fault for calling them and then being resistant to that help.
You do not get anywhere by completely avoiding the hoops they are required to jump through by their bosses. Just get through them as fast as possible by not dragging it out being resistant and you both will be happier and maybe you'll even solve the issue.
For all I know given your attitude here, you didn't even do the troubleshooting and just lied to them saying you did. I'm guilty of occasionally doing this even and I know the importance of actually doing the steps.
Welcome to human lazy/crazy nature.
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »FYI, I believe none of us can see the ticket data. Only you and the support people can.
You can copy paste here all you want, but we would never be able to tell if that was fact or photoshop.
You sir, are dull minded. What would I have to gain by photshoping anythingMystrius_Archaion wrote: »
1) They are paid by the hour and judged based on reducing the amount of time per customer to reduce the amount of cost in more reps and opportunity cost of helping more customers and keeping ticket response time down.
They would not waste your time because that wastes their time which is micro-managed to the point of being grounds for termination of employment.
2) You wanted help so they tried to take the necessary time to actually help.
Your fault for calling them and then being resistant to that help.
You do not get anywhere by completely avoiding the hoops they are required to jump through by their bosses. Just get through them as fast as possible by not dragging it out being resistant and you both will be happier and maybe you'll even solve the issue.
For all I know given your attitude here, you didn't even do the troubleshooting and just lied to them saying you did. I'm guilty of occasionally doing this even and I know the importance of actually doing the steps.
Welcome to human lazy/crazy nature.
How about you actually read the thread instead of making up conspiracy theories that I lied and posted a fake conversation that I edited when I didn't even post it. If I had any insensitivity to proper channels : copying and pasting the conversation is exactly what I would do but I didn't. Respect is something they need. I posted the ticket number, the only people I care to see it are agents. The only reason I started the thread was due to a a very unusually and seemingly aggressive ( more likely irritated) response and there is no other way to get this resolved. I started a ticket went through the trouble shooting despite you'r unfounded accusations. You sound just like them. Saying I didn't do it. That's why I thought it was harassment. As I didn't believe they were serious after the fact. I appreciate you posting on how to go about it. I appreciate the skepticism of the other posters as it does indeed help/For example I am not going to proceed forward claiming harassment ( though, it was not nice).Listen to yourself. What would I have to gain besides what I asked for in the original ticket ( which is not going to happen) . I want the glitch I keep encountering to stop. Because I want to keep playing. How is writing up in these forums any less lazier than what they recommended? I left the ticket numbers on the forum. With hope an agent can look at the conversation and they can be the judge. Submitting further tickets will not work. I have no interest in shaming anyone or blaming anyone. I just want this behavior to stop. If nothing worked, they really did not need to place the blame on me. If something is beyond them, that is fine. Even if most of it is cut and paste, they are responsible for how they communicate. If you had read the thread , you would know I already mentioned this. I had others I know look at this, they agree it was not harassment, but could see how someone could think they were being snarled at to the point of nothing going forward. This was most likely not the case but it has stop. A delayed response would have been preferred even if it were a while from now. The player is not always the problem if there is an impasse. I asked them to credit my account in one or two ways: they said no. Fine! what is not fine is telling me its my fault. All they had to say is no. that's it N O. They way they responded would make anyone on this thread feel accused of the problem.
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »FYI, customer service reps, in most situations, literally can't say "no", and, even if they could, they would not feel comfortable doing so because that instantly angers customers just like it instantly angers children who want cookies and candy and to play with matches when their parents tell them "no".
Their job is to do their best, to the detriment of their own sanity and health from stress-related illnesses, to solve your problem or make you satisfied enough to not drop service with the company and not call/message back. The only way to make that result happen is to try to fix the problem even if they have no option to do so, and often to humor irrational customer demands like sending signals to a tv box when the tv that is attached to that box is the actual problem because it was struck by lightning or to get a technician out to their house "to stop the snakes from crawling through the cable and out the tv screen".(true story of a nutjob caller)