Would you be in favor of ZOS shutting down Cyrodill to make bigger and better BG's?

eso_nya · July 2018

NO!

Id be in favour of shutting down both

Tandor · July 2018

kargen27 wrote: »

jedtb16_ESO wrote: »

other...

i'd be in favour of zos ending pvp entirely.

then we wouldn't have all the nerf threads....

We would still have nerf threads. Have you not seen the threads complaining about trial groups being made of one class and a call to either nerf that class or boost the others? Most the time when PvE complains they are asking for a boost to the class they play though instead of a nerf to the other classes.

So yeah there would be fewer.

To be fair, that's generally in response to changes that have been introduced in order to placate the snowflakes that died in Cyrodiil

!

Both PvPers and PvErs need to learn to play their characters and roll with the changes when they are introduced. However, changes introduced for one playstyle should be limited to that playstyle.

purple-magicb16_ESO · July 2018

NO!

I don't get under what circumstance we would have to choose. Like how would eliminating Cyro make bg better?

wenchmore420b14_ESO · July 2018

NO!

Hammy01 wrote: »

LadyLavina wrote: »

Hammy01 wrote: »

I think we all know just how big of a mess Cyrodiil has been since Summerset (and even long before that) and because of this I have decided to start doing some BGs. I will be completely honest... I have really enjoyed the BGs. BG queues are really really fast, the longest I had to wait was maybe 2 minutes. The action is fast and there is no sitting around waiting for something to happen or having to ride your mount for 10 minutes just to see some action. Plus the chat is not toxic like Cyrodill chat and hardly anyone teabags. It does not matter if you are a good player or a bad player you can still have a lot of fun in the Battlegrounds. I also saw players that were pretty much unkillable in Cyro dieing in the BGs so to me battlegrounds seem a little more balanced. The only down side for me is I would like some bigger battlegrounds like 8v8v8 , 12v12v12 or 16v16v16.

So onto the poll question - Would you be in favor of ZOS shutting down Cyrodill to make bigger and better BG's?

No. While the performance is *terrible*, Cyrodiil is one of the main selling point of the game.

So what happens when people stop going to Cyrodiil? The zone is meant for large scale battles and it was that in the beginning but slowly over time the zone is becoming more and more empty. The latest bugs and freezes that hit consoles had a huge impact on the Cyrodiil population and those of us who stuck it out are now faced with an almost empty zone..... which leads to boredom and frustration. This is on Xbox EU Vivec so maybe other platforms still have a healthy population in Cyrodiil.

So that leads me to this poll...
If ZOS is not going to put major resources into fixing and improving Cyrodiil (Keep recall tokens are not enough) and players just stop going to Cyrodiil.... would you be in favor of ZOS creating bigger and better battlegrounds and then just give up on Cyrodiil altogether.

Lets face it.. Cyrodiil needs a lot of tender loving care right now and it needs some new life breathed into it fast!!

PS. On Xbox EU prime time it is very rare to have more than 2 bars on every faction and non prime time we are extremely lucky to have one bar.

XBox is only a portion of ESO.
On PC/NA, Vivec is always full and I always have a queue to get in, at least prime time, so no, not all Campaigns are empty.