Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***
OP has not provided the real answer for us to choose from.
The answer is Zos chose to work with a guild trader system. After launch they did a major tweak to it. Since then it has been clear the current system has successfully provided ESO a vibrant and healthy economy which of course is the goal.
OP has not provided the real answer for us to choose from.
The answer is Zos chose to work with a guild trader system. After launch they did a major tweak to it. Since then it has been clear the current system has successfully provided ESO a vibrant and healthy economy which of course is the goal.
It's not even the same light as a "Healthy" economy. Even a centralized auction house has a more vibrant and healthy economy than this failed garbage.
OP has not provided the real answer for us to choose from.
The answer is Zos chose to work with a guild trader system. After launch they did a major tweak to it. Since then it has been clear the current system has successfully provided ESO a vibrant and healthy economy which of course is the goal.
It's not even the same light as a "Healthy" economy. Even a centralized auction house has a more vibrant and healthy economy than this failed garbage.
ESO clearly has a very healthy economy. It has served ESO and the community very well which is why it has lasted as long.
One thing for certain, no one has provided a worthy reason for changing it.
OP has not provided the real answer for us to choose from.
The answer is Zos chose to work with a guild trader system. After launch they did a major tweak to it. Since then it has been clear the current system has successfully provided ESO a vibrant and healthy economy which of course is the goal.
It's not even the same light as a "Healthy" economy. Even a centralized auction house has a more vibrant and healthy economy than this failed garbage.
ESO clearly has a very healthy economy. It has served ESO and the community very well which is why it has lasted as long.
One thing for certain, no one has provided a worthy reason for changing it.

OP has not provided the real answer for us to choose from.
The answer is Zos chose to work with a guild trader system. After launch they did a major tweak to it. Since then it has been clear the current system has successfully provided ESO a vibrant and healthy economy which of course is the goal.
It's not even the same light as a "Healthy" economy. Even a centralized auction house has a more vibrant and healthy economy than this failed garbage.
ESO clearly has a very healthy economy. It has served ESO and the community very well which is why it has lasted as long.
One thing for certain, no one has provided a worthy reason for changing it.
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***
Someone get the horse gif...

wtlonewolf20 wrote: »If ZOS changed the UI up a bit to allow you to search for specific items and save your searches 90% of peoples complaints would be solved.
regardless of that ZOS wont do anything because 1) the system is different, 2) its lore friendly, 3) it has a massive gold sink 4) it puts value into guilds and cooperative play 5) It keeps a small group of players from fixing prices effectively and lastly and most importantly 6) Making this Change would require a COMPLETE overhaul of the economy. Everything from Mat farming, drop rates, gold sinks, crafting, recipes. EVERYTHING would have to be overhauled to maintain balance.
Now some may disagree with me and thats fine. but i will tell you that I know people that LOVE to play the trading game. AND they have the resources to mess around. Currently those players have to sink millions of gold into running trade guilds or joining trade guilds to do that. Releasing a Global AH to the game in its current state WOULD allow more pole to sell, but it would destroy many guilds, and the elite traders WOULD control the markets on everything. consider this, Craft bags are a thing. and there are people with access to Billions of gold. A global AH would allow them to own and fix the prices. Also inflation would be horrible.
The ONLY way to get a Global AH in game would be to do a clean sweep of the servers. make all gear Bound or remove it. craft bags would need to be swept and/or bound. Gold would need to be removed. You would have to redesign gold sinks, and essentially remake that portion of the game. ZOS wont do that not unless the current system becomes WAY more broken than people think it is ( i personally thing its as close to stable as it can get).
Motherball wrote: »Thats a bit dramatic, imo. PC has mods that basically do the same thing as an AH and the sky isnt falling. They could just add the same functionality as those mods into the base game and call it a day.
the only reason we don´t have an GA, is quite simple:
we have about 10 Million players and just 2 MEGASERVERS were they all are around,
if we had just an GA, for these MILLIONS of players, it would take you hours to find the things you are looking for!!!
it is now quite often a pain to find those things you are looking for, and just now we have guildtraders, but the best are already overloaded.
What do you think that makes ZOS have decided not to introduce a global auction house and stick to this policy?
OP has not provided the real answer for us to choose from.
The answer is Zos chose to work with a guild trader system. After launch they did a major tweak to it. Since then it has been clear the current system has successfully provided ESO a vibrant and healthy economy which of course is the goal.
It's not even the same light as a "Healthy" economy. Even a centralized auction house has a more vibrant and healthy economy than this failed garbage.
ESO clearly has a very healthy economy. It has served ESO and the community very well which is why it has lasted as long.
One thing for certain, no one has provided a worthy reason for changing it.