jedtb16_ESO wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »Savos_Saren wrote: »Hallothiel wrote: »You know that you don't HAVE to buy the crates you know. They are optional.
That is not (nor has it ever been) the point. The point is that every new feature that has come to ESO recently has been designed with the sole purpose of shoving people to the store over and over. Its just insulting is all. Base game price, paid DLC, "chapters," ESO+, account services, cosmetics, mounts, $100 time-limited homes, crates, crate items that can't be bought with gems, etc. Where does it end? How many different ways do people need to pay in order to just have access to everything the game has to offer without being redirected back towards the store constantly?
Yeah- because it’s a good business model to give everything away for free.
I did not say that, nor have I ever. Don't misconstrue my argument. I was fine with paying for the core game, whatever DLC I wanted, cosmetics from the store occasionally, and had no problem with ESO+ and being charged for account services (even though that's more of a F2P model). But shoving the most desirable mounts into crates that, for the majority of the buyers, will cost more to obtain (by a huge margin) than if they were just put directly into the store, is astoundingly transparent as something that has no one but the shareholders in mind. It sure as hell isn't for our benefit that we have to gamble on some of the most desirable items in the game, cosmetic or not. All of this stuff could be reasonably priced, put in the store for direct purchase, without time limits on them (or rotations if we want the artificial scarcity that bad), but the new business model of major publishers is to push the goodwill of your customers and fleece as much money from them as you can, no matter how it damages the game, the company, and the industry in the long run.
no, you do not have to..... that is a choice you make, you are not forced to do it.
You're making the same semantic argument over and over.
FIne,
we have to gamble on some of the most desirable items in the game, cosmetic or not, if we wish to obtain said items.
yes... and that is a choice you make. you said it yourself 'if we wish to obtain said items'
no one is forcing that choice on you.
it is just pixels.
We're going in circles here. Its not about the choice or the pixels. Its about anti-consumer practices and my desire to call them exactly that. Its that simple. If something is scummy, I don't care if its something in which I can choose not to participate, I'm still going to call it scummy.
how is choice an anti-consumer practice?
Some people just live for the butthurt.
Or, some people think a F2P mobile trash business model in addition to a base game cost, expansions, subscription, paid DLC, and an extensive storefront is just a few steps too far. Hey, maybe I'm overreacting. Its not like publishers will continue to push the envelope until in-game power necessary for competitive play will be shoved into boxes like these? What's that, Battlefront 2 already did it? Its like some of you guys are laying on the tracks and still can't hear the train coming.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »It's called promotion.
Nothing wrong with that.
Unless you thing Crown Crates should be illegal, in which case you could compare ZOS to drug dealers.
For the record, I don't think Crown Crates should be illegal. I do, however, absolutely believe that they are gambling, and should be regulated as such. What that practically means is full disclosure of drop rates. In the US, that is currently not required. Only thing I can do is call my congressman, which I of course have done, and act with my wallet, guilty of buying my share of crown crates. My short conversation with his staff made it pretty clear that they didnt even know something like this existed.
Now if someone could post a meme of Tony Montana fighting a Khajiit, we could get this thread back on track.
idk about the states, most of the news i see from there is concerned with more pressing matters, but in the uk the gambling commission is looking into the matter. crown crate style things that is, not tony monatana fighting a khajiit. this started in november last year so don't hold your breath.
Hallothiel wrote: »You know that you don't HAVE to buy the crates you know. They are optional.
Hallothiel wrote: »You know that you don't HAVE to buy the crates you know. They are optional.
Not if you choose to play MMO's for role play or collecting which traditionally has always been obtainable by items in game as part of the game, not some ridiculous attempt to cheese customers out of money for no reason other than blatant greed.
Hallothiel wrote: »You know that you don't HAVE to buy the crates you know. They are optional.
Not if you choose to play MMO's for role play or collecting which traditionally has always been obtainable by items in game as part of the game, not some ridiculous attempt to cheese customers out of money for no reason other than blatant greed.
I don't consider buying something outside the game as a part of collecting in the game. As far as I am concerned once I have all the homes I can get with gold in the game then I have collected all the homes.
I don't roll play but I would like to think if I did I wouldn't base my character around something I personally don't want to acquire. I suppose my character could develop a sense of jealousy hang out in Cyrodiil and gank every player riding a wolf for no reason other than they are riding a wolf. Then the character could go back to the tavern and brag about giving those uppity wolf riders a lesson.
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »Savos_Saren wrote: »Hallothiel wrote: »You know that you don't HAVE to buy the crates you know. They are optional.
That is not (nor has it ever been) the point. The point is that every new feature that has come to ESO recently has been designed with the sole purpose of shoving people to the store over and over. Its just insulting is all. Base game price, paid DLC, "chapters," ESO+, account services, cosmetics, mounts, $100 time-limited homes, crates, crate items that can't be bought with gems, etc. Where does it end? How many different ways do people need to pay in order to just have access to everything the game has to offer without being redirected back towards the store constantly?
Yeah- because it’s a good business model to give everything away for free.
I did not say that, nor have I ever. Don't misconstrue my argument. I was fine with paying for the core game, whatever DLC I wanted, cosmetics from the store occasionally, and had no problem with ESO+ and being charged for account services (even though that's more of a F2P model). But shoving the most desirable mounts into crates that, for the majority of the buyers, will cost more to obtain (by a huge margin) than if they were just put directly into the store, is astoundingly transparent as something that has no one but the shareholders in mind. It sure as hell isn't for our benefit that we have to gamble on some of the most desirable items in the game, cosmetic or not. All of this stuff could be reasonably priced, put in the store for direct purchase, without time limits on them (or rotations if we want the artificial scarcity that bad), but the new business model of major publishers is to push the goodwill of your customers and fleece as much money from them as you can, no matter how it damages the game, the company, and the industry in the long run.
no, you do not have to..... that is a choice you make, you are not forced to do it.
You're making the same semantic argument over and over.
FIne,
we have to gamble on some of the most desirable items in the game, cosmetic or not, if we wish to obtain said items.
yes... and that is a choice you make. you said it yourself 'if we wish to obtain said items'
no one is forcing that choice on you.
it is just pixels.
We're going in circles here. Its not about the choice or the pixels. Its about anti-consumer practices and my desire to call them exactly that. Its that simple. If something is scummy, I don't care if its something in which I can choose not to participate, I'm still going to call it scummy.
how is choice an anti-consumer practice?
Some people just live for the butthurt.
Or, some people think a F2P mobile trash business model in addition to a base game cost, expansions, subscription, paid DLC, and an extensive storefront is just a few steps too far. Hey, maybe I'm overreacting. Its not like publishers will continue to push the envelope until in-game power necessary for competitive play will be shoved into boxes like these? What's that, Battlefront 2 already did it? Its like some of you guys are laying on the tracks and still can't hear the train coming.
Or if you didn't have anything to complain about you'd have nothing to do. You P2W crowd are just looking for any reason to cry foul.
Edit: Talking about misinformation. You repeated the same tired, untrue claim that I want "everything for free." Not true. Not even close. I just want to know what my money is going to get me. That's how fair, honest businesses work.
Hallothiel wrote: »You know that you don't HAVE to buy the crates you know. They are optional.
That is not (nor has it ever been) the point. The point is that every new feature that has come to ESO recently has been designed with the sole purpose of shoving people to the store over and over. Its just insulting is all. Base game price, paid DLC, "chapters," ESO+, account services, cosmetics, mounts, $100 time-limited homes, crates, crate items that can't be bought with gems, etc. Where does it end? How many different ways do people need to pay in order to just have access to everything the game has to offer without being redirected back towards the store constantly?
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »From their website:
If you want a taste of the shadowy powers the new Crown Crate season has to offer, you can earn up to three free Scalecaller Crown Crates simply by playing The Elder Scrolls Online! To acquire these new items, log into the game and defeat any enemy creature (monsters, bosses, or even enemy NPCs) every day, from Friday, March 9 until Sunday, March 11.
This is drug dealer speech. The first one is always free. That is all...
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »
Really, I don’t know why ZOS just doesn’t put the crate items on the Crown store itself. There are some nice things in some of the crates and if they were offered directly, I would probably buy them. However, I will NOT be buying crates anymore. My RNG sucks so it does me no good to purchase the crates as I usually just get crap.
Savos_Saren wrote: »Hallothiel wrote: »You know that you don't HAVE to buy the crates you know. They are optional.
That is not (nor has it ever been) the point. The point is that every new feature that has come to ESO recently has been designed with the sole purpose of shoving people to the store over and over. Its just insulting is all. Base game price, paid DLC, "chapters," ESO+, account services, cosmetics, mounts, $100 time-limited homes, crates, crate items that can't be bought with gems, etc. Where does it end? How many different ways do people need to pay in order to just have access to everything the game has to offer without being redirected back towards the store constantly?
Yeah- because it’s a good business model to give everything away for free.