MehrunesFlagon wrote: »It's called working with your group rather than against it.
xenowarrior92eb17_ESO wrote: »@MattT1988 then you are not playing enough lol.
also I am so disappointed in most of the replies...shows me the amount of narrow minded people and saltiness in the community...still you don't have to be an elitist to play the game right...if you want to be the common peasant walking down the road and get backstabbed by a bear in a cave then so be it...
Yes the gap in what content lets players get away with is an issue, it has nothing to due with platform either. Not being able to track dps in fights, rather than just a dummy is another separate issue on console. But hey parsers don’t cause toxicity, inspecting other players does.
I’m just baffled by the amount of cognitive dissonance it takes to be ok with parsers, but not with inspections. I think they’re both fine. Both have merits, and detractions. Ultimately though I believe players should seek to play with like minded individuals. I would like to think player inspection would be helpful there. *** are going to be *** regardless.
Yes the gap in what content lets players get away with is an issue, it has nothing to due with platform either. Not being able to track dps in fights, rather than just a dummy is another separate issue on console. But hey parsers don’t cause toxicity, inspecting other players does.
I’m just baffled by the amount of cognitive dissonance it takes to be ok with parsers, but not with inspections. I think they’re both fine. Both have merits, and detractions. Ultimately though I believe players should seek to play with like minded individuals. I would like to think player inspection would be helpful there. *** are going to be *** regardless.
Parsers are consensual. You have to go against the dummy and post your results. Inspecting gear of other players is not.
Honestly, I get yelled at in D3 when I've not switched my gear traits to something perfect, never mind that I'm actually still farming for it and RNG is not my friend.
I don't need to be yelled at by complete strangers because my set pieces are not all Divines or whatever the trait of the month is right now.
If anyone wants to know what gear I'm wearing they can ask (preferably politely). But they don't get to look at it without my permission.
Second, funny that you removed the original quote that was not talking solely about dummy parses, but boss parsesas well. Hate to be the bear of bad news but a third party addon can group parse with or without your permission.
...
Specifically what most want inspection for is to look at the gear of a person trying to join the group for content the group deems worthy of a gear check. If that ain’t your song and dance, then why are you trying to join that group in the first place?
VaranisArano wrote: »Second, funny that you removed the original quote that was not talking solely about dummy parses, but boss parsesas well. Hate to be the bear of bad news but a third party addon can group parse with or without your permission.
...
Specifically what most want inspection for is to look at the gear of a person trying to join the group for content the group deems worthy of a gear check. If that ain’t your song and dance, then why are you trying to join that group in the first place?
To answer the second point, I don't believe there is currently any addon that will tell you my specifc DPS parse without me choosing to link it in chat. You can tell the group DPS and extrapolate from there, but I believe ZOS removed the addon that could tell each group member's DPS parse because the potential for abuse was very high.
I really don't have a problem with a pre-made or guild group wanting to know what gear I've got. That's not my problem with the idea. Thing is, Inspect Player isn't limited to pre-made and guild groups. If you don't think its going to see use in random groupfinder PUGs where it will also be use to shame and exclude, you are being obtuse or very naive. We have enough problems with people kicking solely based off CP that I have zero problems believing that Inspect Player will be abused far worse.
VaranisArano wrote: »Edited to Add: besides, if this is a pre-made group or guild group people are trying to join, what's so hard about simply asking politely? Yeah, its less convenient, but its much less likely to be abused. Besides, with a pre-made or guild group, you already have some communication going to set the group up in the first place.
Yes the gap in what content lets players get away with is an issue, it has nothing to due with platform either. Not being able to track dps in fights, rather than just a dummy is another separate issue on console. But hey parsers don’t cause toxicity, inspecting other players does.
I’m just baffled by the amount of cognitive dissonance it takes to be ok with parsers, but not with inspections. I think they’re both fine. Both have merits, and detractions. Ultimately though I believe players should seek to play with like minded individuals. I would like to think player inspection would be helpful there. *** are going to be *** regardless.
Parsers are consensual. You have to go against the dummy and post your results. Inspecting gear of other players is not.
Honestly, I get yelled at in D3 when I've not switched my gear traits to something perfect, never mind that I'm actually still farming for it and RNG is not my friend.
I don't need to be yelled at by complete strangers because my set pieces are not all Divines or whatever the trait of the month is right now.
If anyone wants to know what gear I'm wearing they can ask (preferably politely). But they don't get to look at it without my permission.
First, people lie.
Second, funny that you removed the original quote that was not talking solely about dummy parses, but boss parsesas well. Hate to be the bear of bad news but a third party addon can group parse with or without your permission.
Third, quit trying to poison the well with appeals to emotion by using words like “consensual”. We both know what your referencing there.
Specifically what most want inspection for is to look at the gear of a person trying to join the group for content the group deems worthy of a gear check. If that ain’t your song and dance, then why are you trying to join that group in the first place?
At times, “because bads will use it to be bads”, isn’t the best reason not to have something. People kill people with forks, maybe we shouldn’t have them.
VaranisArano wrote: »MehrunesFlagon wrote: »It's called working with your group rather than against it.
Yep! You know what? If that tiny bit of DPS is really that important, you could *gasp* talk to your group members. You could actually work it out with them for a couple seconds. Say "Hi" before you start the dungeon. Mention something like "Hey, I've got NMG on, I can switch to something else if needed." And if they say nothing? Well, it wasn't needed.
I know. The idea of actually communicating with PUGs in dungeons is shocking. However, that idea is far less toxic and far less open to abuse than simply inspecting people's gear for snap judgments, especially once people have them set so you can't inspect them and then you have to ask anyway.
This is just from personal experience, but I get much better results from just talking to my group members and being friendly when I enter the dungeon.
MehrunesFlagon wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »MehrunesFlagon wrote: »It's called working with your group rather than against it.
Yep! You know what? If that tiny bit of DPS is really that important, you could *gasp* talk to your group members. You could actually work it out with them for a couple seconds. Say "Hi" before you start the dungeon. Mention something like "Hey, I've got NMG on, I can switch to something else if needed." And if they say nothing? Well, it wasn't needed.
I know. The idea of actually communicating with PUGs in dungeons is shocking. However, that idea is far less toxic and far less open to abuse than simply inspecting people's gear for snap judgments, especially once people have them set so you can't inspect them and then you have to ask anyway.
This is just from personal experience, but I get much better results from just talking to my group members and being friendly when I enter the dungeon.
Yes, while I understand that,but if you realize that such in for can already be seen via combat metrics.although it does not tell you the source but it should at least be obvious.
VaranisArano wrote: »At times, “because bads will use it to be bads”, isn’t the best reason not to have something. People kill people with forks, maybe we shouldn’t have them.
That's a terrible argument, it really is. Because if I had a reasonable expectation that people were going to kill people with forks where I was the manager of a venue, yeah, I might not be allowing forks on the premises. (But I digress, because that's a terrible argument.)
Hey, devs. You know some portion of your player base are going to use this new feature to be complete and utter jerks and you can't adequately keep them from being jerks about it. Should you still let your playerbase have that feature?
Or why we don't have a PVP bounty hunter part of the Justice System.
If bad people will use a feature to harass and abuse fellow players and the developers know that and can't prevent that, should they allow it to become a core feature of the game?
I have a reasonable expectation that players will use the Inspect Player feature to be abusive jerks. Do you disagree? Or do you believe that the convenience an Inspect Player option offers is worth other people having to deal with the abusive jerks?