Maintenance for the week of July 27:
• [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – July 27, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 11:00AM EDT (15:00 UTC)
• [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – July 27, 10:00 UTC (6:00AM EDT) - 15:00 UTC (11:00AM EDT)
• [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – July 27, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 11:00AM EDT (15:00 UTC)
• [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – July 27, 10:00 UTC (6:00AM EDT) - 15:00 UTC (11:00AM EDT)
Rename Cyrodiil?
DanielWinterborn
✭✭✭
I mean it's obvious this must be done, for example Vivec in PC EU should be named Yellowville or Merville or Aldville or something like that. It's always yellow so why not?
You're thinking of doing some Cyro before the super lag begins at peak hours but when you get there... Locked Ad's and maybe half a group EP and a group DC (fighting each other /faceplam).
Or simply remove Cyrodiil and come up with something better, you can't play before peak hours because of the zerg, then at peak hours you can't play because of the lag.
Super ridiculous.
Also I would like to add (and get some flamers to stand up) that this issue is because : new player joins the game-> goes to cyro -> sees all yellow -> creates new Aldmeri character -> joins zerg. This proves two things, first new player sucks, secondly something must be done against the zerg otherwise soon enough most of the PvP population is going to leave, I know heaps have already left because of this reason and more and more will follow. Not to mention those leaving because of the lag. Also what fun is it being AD if there's nobody around to fight?
For now ZoS can sleep well at night knowing that the game is still selling but how much will it last? Until the next big game comes around and people move on and since there are less and less loyal players it will go down faster than the Titanic. Something must be done against the lag and the zerg at the same time. I for one went from doing cyro 3-4 hours a day to doing it 15 minutes at most until leaving, not sure if I should try anymore really.
I'm raising these flags because I'm a loyal player, the only game I play. If I didn't care or if I was a new player I would just leave for good.
You're thinking of doing some Cyro before the super lag begins at peak hours but when you get there... Locked Ad's and maybe half a group EP and a group DC (fighting each other /faceplam).
Or simply remove Cyrodiil and come up with something better, you can't play before peak hours because of the zerg, then at peak hours you can't play because of the lag.
Super ridiculous.
Also I would like to add (and get some flamers to stand up) that this issue is because : new player joins the game-> goes to cyro -> sees all yellow -> creates new Aldmeri character -> joins zerg. This proves two things, first new player sucks, secondly something must be done against the zerg otherwise soon enough most of the PvP population is going to leave, I know heaps have already left because of this reason and more and more will follow. Not to mention those leaving because of the lag. Also what fun is it being AD if there's nobody around to fight?
For now ZoS can sleep well at night knowing that the game is still selling but how much will it last? Until the next big game comes around and people move on and since there are less and less loyal players it will go down faster than the Titanic. Something must be done against the lag and the zerg at the same time. I for one went from doing cyro 3-4 hours a day to doing it 15 minutes at most until leaving, not sure if I should try anymore really.
I'm raising these flags because I'm a loyal player, the only game I play. If I didn't care or if I was a new player I would just leave for good.
1
-
Yolokin_Swagonborn✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭It's already Lagrodiil.
My skills wont workrodiil.
Ball up and spam aoerodill.
Plenty of names already.8 -
Apache_Kid✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭So what are you suggesting? Handicapping AD in that alliance? Reducing the number of people AD can have on their side at one time during a campaign? On Xbox NA in Vivec, Yellow is the worst alliance by far and gets beaten and stomped on every week. As a primarily AD player, instead of demanding for changes, I just went to Shor where yellow is better off. Try switching campaigns because you're not going to get a change just because a certain alliance is the best in one campaign on one platform.Edited by Apache_Kid on January 18, 2018 4:25PM2 -
DanielWinterborn✭✭✭Apache_Kid wrote: »So what are you suggesting? Handicapping AD in that alliance? Reducing the number of people AD can have on their side at one time during a campaign? On Xbox NA in Vivec, Yellow is the worst alliance by far and gets beaten and stomped on every week. As a primarily AD player, instead of demanding for changes, I just went to Shor where yellow is better off. Try switching campaigns because you're not going to get a change just because a certain alliance is the best in one campaign on one platform.
A lot could be done, for example : "Minority buff" (Increase Health, Stamina, Magicka by 1000). That would make 10 people feel like 11, it's a start! Once populations start to become closer in numbers the buff goes away.
They already started by removing AOE caps in the hopes that the zerg ball can get blasted away faster.0 -
The_Smilemeister✭✭✭✭✭I think that Cyrodiil should be renamed on the basis that the zone with the name “Cyrodiil” only covers maybe about 1/3 of the actual size of the province. There’s also the Gold Coast, West Weald, Colovian Highlands, Valus Mountains, Nibenay Basin and Blackwood to consider too.
It should really be called the Heartlands. Although not precisely accurate as much of the zone encompasses much of Nibenay and Colovia and the Heartlands are more culturally neutral, but it makes more sense than giving it the name of the whole province like ZOS decided to do.
In this situation though, why rename the zone when you can just destroy the Dominion? Elven domination of Tamriel came to a crashing end after the Nedes overthrew their Ayleid slavemasters alongside their Nordic allies. Surely a bit of human muscle will put the Elves back in their place and reinforce human dominance over the continent.3 -
Apache_Kid✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭DanielWinterborn wrote: »Apache_Kid wrote: »So what are you suggesting? Handicapping AD in that alliance? Reducing the number of people AD can have on their side at one time during a campaign? On Xbox NA in Vivec, Yellow is the worst alliance by far and gets beaten and stomped on every week. As a primarily AD player, instead of demanding for changes, I just went to Shor where yellow is better off. Try switching campaigns because you're not going to get a change just because a certain alliance is the best in one campaign on one platform.
A lot could be done, for example : "Minority buff" (Increase Health, Stamina, Magicka by 1000). That would make 10 people feel like 11, it's a start! Once populations start to become closer in numbers the buff goes away.
They already started by removing AOE caps in the hopes that the zerg ball can get blasted away faster.
So let's say I am a solo player in a campaign where my alliance is dominating in terms of population at a certain time of day.
I approach another player who is also solo but is on a different alliance with less people.
In this one on one battle, I am now at a disadvantage because I have a resource penalty because my alliance has too many people even though in this battle, I have no back-up or assistance. If the player is around the same skill level as me I am now going to lose this fight because I have a resource penalty brought on by the idea that the other player was "outnumbered" when he was clearly not outnumbered in this fight.
This is just one example where a proposed nerf or buff based on population is absolutely ridiculous and unfair to any player who does not play in a zerg.4 -
Asardes✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭CheeseodiilEdited by Asardes on January 18, 2018 4:38PMBeta tester since February 2014, played ESO-TU October 2015 - August 2022, currently on an extended break
vMA (The Flawless Conqueror) | vVH (Spirit Slayer & of the Undying Song) | vDSA | vAA HM | vHRC HM | vSO HM | vMoL | vAS+1 | Emperor
PC-EU CP 3000+
41,000+ Achievement Points before High IsleMember of:
Pact Veteran Trade: Exemplary
Traders of the Covenant: God of Sales
Tamriels Emporium: God of Sales
Valinor Overflow: Trader
The Traveling Merchant: Silver
Characters:
Asardes | 50 Nord Dragonknight | EP AR 50 | Master Crafter: all traits & recipes, all styles released before High Isle
Alxaril Nelcarion | 50 High Elf Sorcerer | AD AR 20 |
Dro'Bear Three-paws | 50 Khajiit Nightblade | AD AR 20 |
Veronique Nicole | 50 Breton Templar | DC AR 20 |
Sabina Flavia Cosades | 50 Imperial Warden | EP AR 20 |
Ervesa Neloren | 50 Dark Elf Dragonknight | EP AR 20 |
Fendar Khodwin | 50 Redguard Sorcerer | DC AR 20 |
Surilanwe of Lillandril | 50 High Elf Nightblade | AD AR 20 |
Joleen the Swift | 50 Redguard Templar | DC AR 20 |
Draynor Telvanni | 50 Dark Elf Warden | EP AR 20 |
Claudius Tharn | 50 Necromancer | DC AR 20 |
Nazura-la the Bonedancer | 50 Necromancer | AD AR 20 |
Tharkul gro-Shug | 50 Orc Dragonknight | DC AR 4 |
Ushruka gra-Lhurgash | 50 Orc Sorcerer | AD AR 4 |
Cienwen ferch Llywelyn | 50 Breton Nightblade | DC AR 4 |
Plays-with-Sunray | 50 Argonian Templar | EP AR 4 |
Milariel | 50 Wood Elf Warden | AD AR 4 |
Scheei-Jul | 50 Necromancer | EP AR 4 |
PC-NA CP 1800+
30,000+ Achievement Points before High IsleMember of:
Savage Blade: Majestic Machette
Characters:
Asardes the Exile | 50 Nord Dragonknight | EP AR 30 |0 -
Karm1cOne✭✭✭✭✭Ap gains should be maybe 5% higher per bar difference between factions. Enough for incentive to play on the weak side, but no combat upperhand.2 -
jlboozer✭✭✭✭✭
✭You've already renamed it Cry-odiil, because that's all you've done with this post is shed tears. L2P Felicia...1 -
DanielWinterborn✭✭✭The_Smilemeister wrote: »DanielWinterborn wrote: »
Is that your best comeback?
Trying not to insult this cancer posters here.0 -
The_Smilemeister✭✭✭✭✭DanielWinterborn wrote: »The_Smilemeister wrote: »DanielWinterborn wrote: »
Is that your best comeback?
Trying not to insult this cancer posters here.
...By anti-insulting instead?0 -
JobooAGS✭✭✭✭✭
✭The_Smilemeister wrote: »DanielWinterborn wrote: »The_Smilemeister wrote: »DanielWinterborn wrote: »
Is that your best comeback?
Trying not to insult this cancer posters here.
...By anti-insulting instead?
this thread0 -
MaxwellC✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Pretty sure Cyrodiil already had a new name and it was/always has been Lagrodiil.不動の Steadfast - Unwavering
XBL Gamer Tag - Maxwell
XB1 Maxwell Crystal - NA DC CP 800+ Redguard Stamina DK
XB1 Max Crystal - NA DC CP 800+ Brenton Magicka DK
PC Maxwell-Crystal - NA DC - CP 200+ Brenton Magicka DK 「Retired」Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell0 -
Kuramas9tails✭✭✭✭✭
✭Salt-odill
You sound new to PVP but you say you are not new.
Your friendly neighborhood crazy cat lady of ESO
New PSN name: SundariTheLast. Proud seller in RedEye Empire, PURPLE GANG and Backalley Trading.
AD High Elf Mageblade DPS (General)(Former Empress) -- Stormproof/VMOL, VHOF, VDSA completion
AD Khajiit Mageblade DPS -- Flawless Conquerer
FOR THE QUEEN!
PS4/NA0 -
NewBlacksmurf✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭See other post.....on page 2 now
Yeah Cyrodil should be removed entirely and in its place a multi zoned PvE world version and campaigns broken into a pvp new type of large Battle ground.
Shrug seems i visor to me but I’ve been saying this from 2014-PC (PTS)/Xbox One: NewBlacksmurf
~<{[50]}>~ looks better than *5010 -
DanielWinterborn✭✭✭Kuramas9tails wrote: »Salt-odill
You sound new to PVP but you say you are not new.
How do I sound new? Was it in my voice?0 -
The_Smilemeister✭✭✭✭✭DanielWinterborn wrote: »Kuramas9tails wrote: »Salt-odill
You sound new to PVP but you say you are not new.
How do I sound new? Was it in my voice?
Dude, either you haven’t taken your chill pill or you OD’d on trollquilizer.0 -
Galendior✭✭
1. It isn't balanced around 1vs1.Apache_Kid wrote: »So let's say I am a solo player in a campaign where my alliance is dominating in terms of population at a certain time of day.
I approach another player who is also solo but is on a different alliance with less people.
In this one on one battle, I am now at a disadvantage because I have a resource penalty because my alliance has too many people even though in this battle, I have no back-up or assistance. If the player is around the same skill level as me I am now going to lose this fight because I have a resource penalty brought on by the idea that the other player was "outnumbered" when he was clearly not outnumbered in this fight.
This is just one example where a proposed nerf or buff based on population is absolutely ridiculous and unfair to any player who does not play in a zerg.
2. You would still win, thanks to all those "early morning zerg rewards" you conveniently forgot. Even if he has a bit more ressources, you have more crit, more wpn/magdmg, more hp thanks to sitting on all keeps, 6 scrolls and emp bonus.0 -
DanielWinterborn✭✭✭The_Smilemeister wrote: »DanielWinterborn wrote: »Kuramas9tails wrote: »Salt-odill
You sound new to PVP but you say you are not new.
How do I sound new? Was it in my voice?
Dude, either you haven’t taken your chill pill or you OD’d on trollquilizer.
Ohhh shucks you got me! Now be a good boy leave.0 -
Apache_Kid✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭
1. It isn't balanced around 1vs1.Apache_Kid wrote: »So let's say I am a solo player in a campaign where my alliance is dominating in terms of population at a certain time of day.
I approach another player who is also solo but is on a different alliance with less people.
In this one on one battle, I am now at a disadvantage because I have a resource penalty because my alliance has too many people even though in this battle, I have no back-up or assistance. If the player is around the same skill level as me I am now going to lose this fight because I have a resource penalty brought on by the idea that the other player was "outnumbered" when he was clearly not outnumbered in this fight.
This is just one example where a proposed nerf or buff based on population is absolutely ridiculous and unfair to any player who does not play in a zerg.
2. You would still win, thanks to all those "early morning zerg rewards" you conveniently forgot. Even if he has a bit more ressources, you have more crit, more wpn/magdmg, more hp thanks to sitting on all keeps, 6 scrolls and emp bonus.
Not necessarily. There is no guarantee that I will have all of these bonuses. Many groups in Cyrodiil will never even go after scrolls unless every single last keep and resource on the map is already flipped because they offer no AP reward for capturing it directly other than the quest which is minuscule for the time involved. Yesterday on Xbox NA shor we on AD were dominating in the morning and instead of going after scrolls the groups would just go back and froth from blue to red home keeps, flipping them, then going to the other side and letting the other alliance re-flip them so we could just go back and take them. This gets us AP, grabbing scrolls does not. This meant that we did not have any of those buffs.
Also as far as your 'point' (and i use that term loosely) of it not being balanced around 1v1, then ok what about a 2v2 battle? Or a 3v3? Or wait, what about a 4v4! Or... wait... maybe 5v5? 10v10? Should we not balance around any of those?
Asking for nerfs is not the solution to the problem. You can switch campaigns or start up your own PvP guild for whatever alliance you want and recruit people to it and get people to play in your campaign. Nerfing an entire group of players just because others decided to play on the same team as them is absurd to me.0 -
The_Smilemeister✭✭✭✭✭DanielWinterborn wrote: »The_Smilemeister wrote: »DanielWinterborn wrote: »Kuramas9tails wrote: »Salt-odill
You sound new to PVP but you say you are not new.
How do I sound new? Was it in my voice?
Dude, either you haven’t taken your chill pill or you OD’d on trollquilizer.
Ohhh shucks you got me! Now be a good boy leave.
I have a better idea for a name. Triggerediil.
1 -
Yolokin_Swagonborn✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭The_Smilemeister wrote: »DanielWinterborn wrote: »The_Smilemeister wrote: »DanielWinterborn wrote: »Kuramas9tails wrote: »Salt-odill
You sound new to PVP but you say you are not new.
How do I sound new? Was it in my voice?
Dude, either you haven’t taken your chill pill or you OD’d on trollquilizer.
Ohhh shucks you got me! Now be a good boy leave.
I have a better idea for a name. Triggerediil.
Waiting for Camelot Unchainedrodiil0 -
Shardan4968✭✭✭✭✭
✭I thought this thread will be about changing Cyrodiil to Nibenay, because Gold Coast is also in Cyrodiil and you know... logic and all... well I'm disappointed.
PC/EU0 -
The_Smilemeister✭✭✭✭✭Shardan4968 wrote: »I thought this thread will be about changing Cyrodiil to Nibenay, because Gold Coast is also in Cyrodiil and you know... logic and all... well I'm disappointed.
Chorrol, Hackdirt and Vlastarus are all Colovian, not Nibenese, and even then the zone covers about maybe half of Nibenay. Blackwood, Nibenay Basin and the Valus Mountains are still missing.
Edit: Had to edit three times due to bloody phone!Edited by The_Smilemeister on January 18, 2018 5:49PM0 -
RABIDxWOLVERINE✭✭✭✭Just say NO to nerfs kids...Rhaegar Gregorson, The Ebonheart Centurion - Imperial Dragonknight
RABIDxWOLVERINE - Xbox One, NA, Ebonheart Pact
Loreseekers
BLOOD FOR THE PACT!1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZcf1ifL1l4#t=11s"]Teamocil[/video]