Why would Zenimax deny their additional income? Are u aware that every bot has ESO+ and pays it every month just for craftbag? The more bots around, the bigger the income.
Apache_Kid wrote: »It's not that they are ignored, but rather that ZoS refuses to hire more people to act as permanent gamemasters to enforce the rules on all platforms. This is the only way they can curb the bot epidemic because at this point the gold farmers are getting new bot trains set up faster then ZoS cam ban them. We need more visible gamemasters on all platforms.
Apache_Kid wrote: »It's not that they are ignored, but rather that ZoS refuses to hire more people to act as permanent gamemasters to enforce the rules on all platforms. This is the only way they can curb the bot epidemic because at this point the gold farmers are getting new bot trains set up faster then ZoS cam ban them. We need more visible gamemasters on all platforms.
You don't need more staff to combat basic bots. The problem can be largely mitigated with proper tools -- at client, server and customer service levels.
If ZOS was putting a real effort into combating bots, we wouldn't see the obvious, rudimentary bots we do. They just don't care enough to invest more into cheat prevention. They probably presume their core audience is oblivious to the impact and therefore it is a low priority to them.
I tried to do the skill point quest in Glenumbra (Camlorn) earlier - couldn't complete it because couldn't find a werewolf staying alive long enough to turn them into a human. They are absolutely ruining the game. ZoS, you gotta have a better plan. Get some GMs out there issuing instant temp bans. We all know their favourite spots to farm for scraps - surely you know them too? If not, start giving power to dedicated players that you can trust. I'm PS4 NA server and more than happy to help... but you MUST do something. This is now gamebreaking.
Apache_Kid wrote: »So what are you suggesting? Some sort of system that recognizes bots as a bot when they sign on? You have offered alot of really vague suggestions here. ZoS needs more staff for just about every aspect of this game right now. Bugs go unfixed for months, bot-hot-spots are rampant when all it would take is a gamemaster patrolling the popular spots once a day, all of these things need more time spent on them. Even if had "cheat prevention" (idk what that even means) they would need to dedicate employee time to implementing that which they clearly don't have much of.
Apache_Kid wrote: »So what are you suggesting? Some sort of system that recognizes bots as a bot when they sign on? You have offered alot of really vague suggestions here. ZoS needs more staff for just about every aspect of this game right now. Bugs go unfixed for months, bot-hot-spots are rampant when all it would take is a gamemaster patrolling the popular spots once a day, all of these things need more time spent on them. Even if had "cheat prevention" (idk what that even means) they would need to dedicate employee time to implementing that which they clearly don't have much of.
These aren't new problems to gaming. There are all kinds of solutions that ZOS doesn't use.
For example, they can improve client security to better detect the programs used for botting. The same kind of tools can be used to mitigate other forms of cheating such as memory hacking.
At a server level, ZOS can put checks for certain kinds of player activities. There are ways to do this without significant performance hits. The obvious bot trains players observe should be easy for ZOS servers to detect.
At a customer service level, ZOS can create tools that give CSRs fast access to the details they need to quickly adjudicate cases of potential cheating. While we don't know what kind of tools CSRs have, the kinds of social engineering I've seen discussed suggest they aren't very good.
Apache_Kid wrote: »Everything that you just mentioned would require them to hire more employees to implement. There is 0 chance they have the time to do any of that with current staff numbers when we see bugs go unfixed for months. They just don't have the hours.
Apache_Kid wrote: »Everything that you just mentioned would require them to hire more employees to implement. There is 0 chance they have the time to do any of that with current staff numbers when we see bugs go unfixed for months. They just don't have the hours.
That's not necessarily true at all. ZOS -- and in the larger picture, Zenimax -- already has the technical expertise to implement all of these things. They simply choose to allocate their programming resources elsewhere.
Regardless, investing in the proper technology is the true solution, not hiring more CSRs.
Apache_Kid wrote: »Apache_Kid wrote: »Everything that you just mentioned would require them to hire more employees to implement. There is 0 chance they have the time to do any of that with current staff numbers when we see bugs go unfixed for months. They just don't have the hours.
That's not necessarily true at all. ZOS -- and in the larger picture, Zenimax -- already has the technical expertise to implement all of these things. They simply choose to allocate their programming resources elsewhere.
Regardless, investing in the proper technology is the true solution, not hiring more CSRs.
YO come on man "they simply choose to allocate their programming resources elsewhere"
Which means they don't have enough resources or people to do all the stuff they currently are doing (stuff they obviously feel they need to do) AND make all of these infrastructure and server upgrades. You're literally making my argument for me then telling me I'm wrong.
Apache_Kid wrote: »Apache_Kid wrote: »Everything that you just mentioned would require them to hire more employees to implement. There is 0 chance they have the time to do any of that with current staff numbers when we see bugs go unfixed for months. They just don't have the hours.
That's not necessarily true at all. ZOS -- and in the larger picture, Zenimax -- already has the technical expertise to implement all of these things. They simply choose to allocate their programming resources elsewhere.
Regardless, investing in the proper technology is the true solution, not hiring more CSRs.
YO come on man "they simply choose to allocate their programming resources elsewhere"
Which means they don't have enough resources or people to do all the stuff they currently are doing (stuff they obviously feel they need to do) AND make all of these infrastructure and server upgrades. You're literally making my argument for me then telling me I'm wrong.
Hardly. Your point was, "It's not that they are ignored, but rather that ZoS refuses to hire more people to act as permanent gamemasters to enforce the rules on all platforms. "
GMs are low wage CSRs (but high cost because managing people is expensive) that are usually outsourced. That is the least efficient and least effective way to deal with the problem when there are already obvious technical solutions that have not been implemented.
They need money (accounts, subs...) But if they gonna do something they will nerf scraps. This is how they roll...
They need money (accounts, subs...) But if they gonna do something they will nerf scraps. This is how they roll...
They don't need eso+ accounts, and they only need one psn+ account per playstation, and presumably, they don't use that account to farm with - same for XBOX too.
It's becoming pandemic out there right now. It's not just one set of people either, there are now multiple companies selling gold and therefore multiple bot farming groups.
If ZoS don't react now, they'll lose control of the game forever. It's causing lag, and preventing completion of quests - that alone should be enough for them to act - on top of that, these guys are selling gold for cash to players meaning those players are FAR less likely to spend money on crowns. ZoS are losing out as much as we are, they just don't see it.
transGemini wrote: »Forgive my ignorance but how do you spot a bot?
lordrichter wrote: »Bots are a simple solution. Just add CAPTCHA to the game and require the player to pass it to get loot from anything.