
The game forces you to choose a specific race for certain roles .
Magicka DD > High Elf , Dunmer
Stamina DD > Redguard , Khajit , Orc , Imperial
Healer > Breton , High Elf , Argonian
Tank > Imperial , Argonian , Orc , Nord
MercTheMage wrote: »What would be the point of having races then?
No, would make race choice meaningless and reduce diversity.
There is plenty of choice in race vs attribute/passives.
My magicka characters are dunmer, altmer, Breton, and argonian.
My stam characters are khajiit, Imperial, Nord and Bosmer
They all do just fine, regardless of race.
Note that this get worse in that you don't research builds for your first character, the character description is pretty much the same as in Skyrim.Silver_Strider wrote: »MercTheMage wrote: »What would be the point of having races then?
These types of posts confuse me.
If I choose to play a Magic Khajiit Templar, my racials are all but useless for that playstyle and for all intent and purpose may as well not exist since their benefits are virtually nonexistent anyways. There's plenty of people that play races just for their Lore, Aesthetics, etc. that asking why have races at all if racials weren't a thing is kind of a weak argument.No, would make race choice meaningless and reduce diversity.
There is plenty of choice in race vs attribute/passives.
My magicka characters are dunmer, altmer, Breton, and argonian.
My stam characters are khajiit, Imperial, Nord and Bosmer
They all do just fine, regardless of race.
Racial diversity is would NOT decrease if racials were removed. The differences between an Altmer and Argonian are incredibly vast and not just passive wise. An Argonian looks NOTHING like an Altmer, typically lives in swamps and worships sentinel trees. Altmer does NONE of that. So racial diversity is not an argument at all.
Also, lol at your examples as they all play within their shoehorned archetype, be it magic or stamina.
The game forces you to choose a specific race for certain roles .
Magicka DD > High Elf , Dunmer
Stamina DD > Redguard , Khajit , Orc , Imperial
Healer > Breton , High Elf , Argonian
Tank > Imperial , Argonian , Orc , Nord
The game doesn't FORCE you to do anything. I don't worry about race when creating characters.
Stam Nightblade DPS - Bosmer
Mag Templar DPS - Argonian
Mag Nightblade DPS - Khajit
Only ones that follow the "rule":
Mag Sorc DPS - Dunmer
hybrid DK Tank - Orc
Stam warden DPS - Orc
Important question: Altmer population is high, far more than 10%.Silver_Strider wrote: »MercTheMage wrote: »What would be the point of having races then?
These types of posts confuse me.
If I choose to play a Magic Khajiit Templar, my racials are all but useless for that playstyle and for all intent and purpose may as well not exist since their benefits are virtually nonexistent anyways. There's plenty of people that play races just for their Lore, Aesthetics, etc. that asking why have races at all if racials weren't a thing is kind of a weak argument.No, would make race choice meaningless and reduce diversity.
There is plenty of choice in race vs attribute/passives.
My magicka characters are dunmer, altmer, Breton, and argonian.
My stam characters are khajiit, Imperial, Nord and Bosmer
They all do just fine, regardless of race.
Racial diversity is would NOT decrease if racials were removed. The differences between an Altmer and Argonian are incredibly vast and not just passive wise. An Argonian looks NOTHING like an Altmer, typically lives in swamps and worships sentinel trees. Altmer does NONE of that. So racial diversity is not an argument at all.
Also, lol at your examples as they all play within their shoehorned archetype, be it magic or stamina.
Silver_Strider wrote: »MercTheMage wrote: »What would be the point of having races then?
These types of posts confuse me.
If I choose to play a Magic Khajiit Templar, my racials are all but useless for that playstyle and for all intent and purpose may as well not exist since their benefits are virtually nonexistent anyways. There's plenty of people that play races just for their Lore, Aesthetics, etc. that asking why have races at all if racials weren't a thing is kind of a weak argument.No, would make race choice meaningless and reduce diversity.
There is plenty of choice in race vs attribute/passives.
My magicka characters are dunmer, altmer, Breton, and argonian.
My stam characters are khajiit, Imperial, Nord and Bosmer
They all do just fine, regardless of race.
Racial diversity is would NOT decrease if racials were removed. The differences between an Altmer and Argonian are incredibly vast and not just passive wise. An Argonian looks NOTHING like an Altmer, typically lives in swamps and worships sentinel trees. Altmer does NONE of that. So racial diversity is not an argument at all.
Also, lol at your examples as they all play within their shoehorned archetype, be it magic or stamina.
Important question: Altmer population is high, far more than 10%.
Is this because their good look and interesting and appealing culture?
Or because of stats? No Altmer mage sorcerer don't have top dps anymore but had it for an long time.
Does any other MMO have an 10% dps difference depending on race? Race not class, WOW restrict some races from picking some classes because of lore so if one class it OP this will will change the race max dps.
No, would make race choice meaningless and reduce diversity.
There is plenty of choice in race vs attribute/passives.
My magicka characters are dunmer, altmer, Breton, and argonian.
My stam characters are khajiit, Imperial, Nord and Bosmer
They all do just fine, regardless of race.
Vanthras79 wrote: »I hate having to worry about racial passives making the character choice for me.
Racial/classes advantage has been out even since AD&D paper game came out, what you'Re taling about removing racial passives?